Jump to content

Recommended Posts

6 hours ago, jdrichard said:

 

Is this a good diver watch? 

What do you mean? It's a vintage piece, you can find the asking price of similar ones on chrono24. 

BTW, you have posted in the projects section that is to show others how things are done, if you want just show a watch or discuss we have both a watch collection and and a general watch discussion section. 

Edited by jdm
Link to post
Share on other sites

Probably not with that gasket :wacko:

But if sealed to original factory spec then yes, it should be good for a static pressure equivalent to a depth of 666ft of water.

However, even with new replacement gaskets (back and crown) and a new crystal, you may struggle get it to achieve original spec. It's a 54 year old and over time it's possible that the surface condition of the sealing surfaces of the back and case, the crystal seat, and the crown could have deteriorated, even if only very slightly, making the original spec difficult to realize. It all depends on how those surfaces have fared over the last half century.

You can really only make that judgement after a pressure test.

On the other hand, as a desk diver it's brilliant :D

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
Probably not with that gasket :wacko:
But if sealed to original factory spec then yes, it should be good for a static pressure equivalent to a depth of 666ft of water.
However, even with new replacement gaskets (back and crown) and a new crystal, you may struggle get it to achieve original spec. It's a 54 year old and over time it's possible that the surface condition of the sealing surfaces of the back and case, the crystal seat, and the crown could have deteriorated, even if only very slightly, making the original spec difficult to realize. It all depends on how those surfaces have fared over the last half century.
You can really only make that judgement after a pressure test.
On the other hand, as a desk diver it's brilliant

Thanks. It is not working, so first I need to strip it down an see where the issue (s) are. I do agree that a desk diver is where it belongs. I did get another diver yesterday. Bostok Amphibian655377b3f9e9d3a15094c3c9fb75dae4.jpg

Sent from my GT-N5110 using Tapatalk

Link to post
Share on other sites
Hi JD  looks a decent watch plenty if information available on the 11ALAC,  suitably sealed and pressure tested I would wear it for sure.

Thanks. I'll look for the manual

Sent from my GT-N5110 using Tapatalk

Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, jdrichard said:

Bostok Amphibian

Nice Amphibia.

Assuming it's a 2416 inside you may like to have a lok here when you service it...

 

Link to post
Share on other sites
On 1/31/2020 at 2:20 PM, watchweasol said:

Hi JD  looks a decent watch plenty if information available on the 11ALAC,  suitably sealed and pressure tested I would wear it for sure.

It is a quality movement, what I like about it especially, is its bush bearing rotor.

Some come with permanently sealed barrels. 

In my book its design is superior to ETA, more like zenith movements.

 

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
It is a quality movement, what I like about it especially, is its bush bearing rotor.
Some come with permanently sealed barrels. 
In my book its design is superior to ETA, more like zenith movements.
 

A lot of history in this company and the watches are built like tanks. I now have two.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Recently Browsing

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • How did this project eventually go? The GMT-MASTER does not have an independently adjustable GMT hand. Basically, it points straight-up at midnight and straight down at noon. The bezel is rotated to use that GMT hand to indicate the second time zone. (you can pull the GMT setting gear from an ETA to simulate this lack of function) The GMT-MASTER II does have an independent GMT hand, which can be set. This allows three time zones to be possibly set. The Rolex 1655 has the same movement as the GMT-MASTER and the bezel is fixed. Purpose was to indicate day and night while in the darkness of a cave. I worked on a (crappy) replica of a 1655 which had the "quick-set" GMT hand. I think the dial is way to busy and difficult to read as well, but that's another story...
    • Welcome to the forum.
    • Turns out (accidentally) dropping it on the floor opens it allright:) Verzonden vanaf mijn iPhone met Tapatalk
    • Hi Tom,   Mine machine is working fine but slightly out of sync (I still didnt figured out why as in the biggining it was completly fine, no issues), so I use manual overide button to move between cycles, its abit tricky as I have to watch metal disks which turns things on/off if not it will jump to another cycle (it cause a bit of an issue as it wont spin long enough to remove fluid between jars).   Regarding documentation - one Ive scanned for you was received from Elma after I contacted them, they told me that they dont have any shcemtics for this machines, I only got electronic schema for RM-90 if I recall correctly which is much more advanced and newer. Because machine is not working as I would like it, Im thinking to create a new electronic system for it based on arduino or something like that, Im not a programmer so it might be too diffcoult for me. If mainboard replacement for RM-90 would be cheaper I could use that for my machine - just got that idea  right now :). Still some parts are the same between those two machines - jars, possibly motors, heating plate etc.   Im mostly interested in American pocket watches, actually South Bend only :).   Regards,    Rafal
×
×
  • Create New...