Jump to content

Help needed understanding ETA 2824-2 timing machine results


Recommended Posts

The below two images are from before (1st "dark" image) and after (2nd image) service and regulating a 17 jewels ETA 2824-2. Looking at the pallet fork in strong magnification 40X, the pallets, guard pin, and the roller impulse pin all look fine and sits solidly. There is definitely side shake and end shake of the pallet fork, escape wheel and the train wheels, but if it's too much I can't determine with my limited experience. Any idea of what to do or investigate?

 

TG0.jpg

TG1.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Unless a  jewel is broken, faulty side shakes on pallet fork arbor and staff are unlikely, I wouldn,t think a problem exist there.

Make sure upper and lower jewels ( in chaton) endstones are not loose( in the housing)  and shock springs are holding the jewels in place.

Endshake ( axial) on staff is too much if the pivot jumps out of the jewel as you gently lift one side of the balance wheel with tweezers.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

29 minutes ago, VWatchie said:

Good point and you're probably right as I now have three sources stating 53 degrees; you, watchweasol, and Caveman's Watch Forum. LEPSI states 50 degrees.

No matter what it is looks like you've lost some amplitude, let it run a day and re-check.

There still still some spurious beats - but that can be noise picked up, try adjusting sensitivity and with the mov.t inside or outside the case. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, jdm said:

No matter what it is looks like you've lost some amplitude, let it run a day and re-check.

There still still some spurious beats - but that can be noise picked up, try adjusting sensitivity and with the mov.t inside or outside the case. 

Good point! The reading is taken just a minute or so after I had assembled the balance and wound it. I believe I read somewhere you should let the movement "run in" for a day or so before assessing its performance after a service, right?

I'm certainly no timing machine expert (or I wouldn't need to ask) but by "adjusting sensitivity" do you mean the "Gain" of the timing machine (Weishi 1900)?

So, it can make a difference if the movement is measured inside or outside the case, huh? Can you tell me more about that? At first thought, it doesn't seem to make sense...:huh: Note, I'm not questioning it, I'm merely curious and wish to know more!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 
 
 
24 minutes ago, aac58 said:

There's a big list here: https://watchguy.co.uk/cgi-bin/lift_angle

In it the 2824 is listed as 53º, and 2824-2 as 50º

So, there we have it! Both are right it would seem! Mine is a 2824-2, so 50 degrees after all! Thanks! Oh BTW, the correct link is: https://watchguy.co.uk/cgi-bin/lift_angles

  • Confused 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, VWatchie said:

Good point! The reading is taken just a minute or so after I had assembled the balance and wound it.

For best testing let it on an automatic arm (ideally cyclotest type, these are cheap from China, not collector's winder) and check again the following day, give time to oil to spread evenly. You will have it right for regulation and have tested winding too.

Adjust gain (which compensate microphone sensitivity) to where you have less noise. Mov't Inside or outside can have strange effects depending on case type but in the end a bad patter is bad.

Edited by jdm
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Can too much oil on pallets cause a drag strong enough to account for that much loss of amplitude. Or wrong oil?

2 hours ago, VWatchie said:

Good point and you're probably right as I now have three sources stating 53 degrees; you, watchweasol, and Caveman's Watch Forum. LEPSI states 50 degrees.

What are your sources for lift angles?

This source just list eta2824 dosn,t get into variants.I just assume all variants of same caliber lift the same angle.:rolleyes:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The lift angle is not the issue one side of the beat is not correct. It could be a loose impulse jewel, a loose pallet jewel, a dirty pallet jewel or a dirty escape wheel. My first effort to resolve this is to check the pallet jewels for damage and tightness and if OK I would just clean again and lubricate again. Its amazing how the smallest amount of unwanted dirt can effect the performance.

On a side note I very rarely bother to adjust the lift angle setting on the timographer unless I suspect it is way out. A smooth pattern on both sides of the beat and a decent amplitude is my goal. 

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, watchweasol said:

Hi  Just done a run through of the lift angles:-  

Watch Guy    2824  =  53    2824-2  =  53
caveman      2824   =   53
lepsi              2824   =   50

As mentioned above, the 2824-2 lift angle is 50°, see attached document. Many people makes no distinction between 2824 and 2824-2, which are different in that and few other details.

_C_T_CT_2824-2_FDE_481688_24.pdf

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 hours ago, jdm said:

For best testing let it on an automatic arm (ideally cyclotest type, these are cheap from China, not collector's winder) and check again the following day, give time to oil to spread evenly. You will have it right for regulation and have tested winding too.

Adjust gain (which compensate microphone sensitivity) to where you have less noise. Mov't Inside or outside can have strange effects depending on case type but in the end a bad patter is bad.

So, just to make sure, do you think this one would be OK? Seems to be a copy of a Bergeon product costing $1000!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

32 minutes ago, VWatchie said:

So, just to make sure, do you think this one would be OK? Seems to be a copy of a Bergeon product costing $1000!

Yes, when I say that Swiss tool prices are robbery when it's the same product possibly made by same factories, there is always someone coming back with the "quality tools" mantra, without specifying supporting reasons. That being said, of course the Swiss make many tools and machines that nobody else makes, or not to the same standard.

There is also a more practical 3 arms type for something more https://www.aliexpress.com/item/-/33035432640.html

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 hours ago, Nucejoe said:

Can too much oil on pallets account for such drop in amplitude?

I couldn't say, but I would guess yes! watchrepairlessons.com shows a very convenient and exact way to oil the pallets which I practice.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, jdm said:

Yes, when I say that Swiss tool prices are robbery when it's the same product possibly made by same factories, there is always someone coming back with the "quality tools" mantra, without specifying supporting reasons. That being said, of course the Swiss make many tools and machines that nobody else makes, or not to the same standard.

There is also a more practical 3 arms type for something more https://www.aliexpress.com/item/-/33035432640.html

Thanks for confirming!

Hm... your option is twice as expensive but looks somehow more convenient/smaller. However, it seems to lack a hook for hanging it on to a wall which will spread the oil more uniformly. Nothing a handy person can't handle I guess, but I'm unfortunately not that type of person.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, jdm said:

As mentioned above, the 2824-2 lift angle is 50°, see attached document. Many people makes no distinction between 2824 and 2824-2, which are different in that and few other details.

_C_T_CT_2824-2_FDE_481688_24.pdf 6.89 MB · 3 downloads

My impression is that 90 % or more of all the ETA 2824 watches that I look at have the 2824-2 type of movement. Anyway, good that we have now unambiguously established that the lift angle of the 2824-2 is 50 degrees.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 hours ago, clockboy said:

The lift angle is not the issue one side of the beat is not correct. It could be a loose impulse jewel, a loose pallet jewel, a dirty pallet jewel or a dirty escape wheel. My first effort to resolve this is to check the pallet jewels for damage and tightness and if OK I would just clean again and lubricate again. Its amazing how the smallest amount of unwanted dirt can effect the performance.

On a side note I very rarely bother to adjust the lift angle setting on the timographer unless I suspect it is way out. A smooth pattern on both sides of the beat and a decent amplitude is my goal. 

Thanks clockboy!

The impulse jewel and the pallets are spotless, in perfect condition (as far as I can see in my stereomicroscope) and as tight as can be. The escape wheel is spotless and has some end shake and side shake. The pallet fork jewel holes are spotless as well. I will try JDMs suggestion to give it a solid day or so of running and then assess it again (experimenting with the Gain gauge), inside and outside of its case. If it doesn't help I'll re-clean and re-lubricate.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have looked a little bit on those two pictures you posted and would initialy say the represent two different symtoms.
The upper one suggest the exit stone on your pallet has some dirt or something on it.
The lower picture suggests the hairspring is toutching something, it's a typical signal of that phenomena.


 

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, HSL said:

I have looked a little bit on those two pictures you posted and would initialy say the represent two different symtoms.
The upper one suggest the exit stone on your pallet has some dirt or something on it.
The lower picture suggests the hairspring is toutching something, it's a typical signal of that phenomena.


 

I can confirm that you are right about the dirt on the pallet stone. The movement was indeed in need of a service.

I'm wearing it on my arm as I write this. I'll assess it in a day or two. If the symptoms remain I'll have a very close look at the hairspring. Thanks! :) 

Edited by VWatchie
Tired, writing BS
Link to comment
Share on other sites



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I suppose it would depend upon what your lubricating with those? for instance what does the manufacturer say about those lubricants? I have a PDF from the manufacture and a rather peculiar statement found on the bottom of the chart. my suspicion is the reason the recommending would be without epilam the HP oils like the spread except when they're in Ruby jewel's with steel pivots. tableEN lubrication 2020.pdf
    • These types of hairsprings become weak with age and very fragile. Which I expect it is that giving you trouble, and that wheel is not the correct one, if it were not bent I don't think the movement would run as the teeth are not the correct height. The problem you have is price which depends on you. It can be repaired but is it worth it to you, because there is little value in the clock. A wheel can be made and hairspring replaced. Or hang on to it and keep looking on ebay which is your best bet for replacement parts or even a complete movement but it will be like finding a needle in a haystack. 
    • I did that also for a few movements - well, mainly in/around the train jewels. I made big efforts to epilame the mainplate WITHOUT getting Epilame into the Pallet fork jewels (where it's not supposed to be, right?). I made litte barriers with Rodico around that jewel and used drops from a syringe to apply on the rest.  However, I've now stopped doing this. For three reasons: 1. It's a hassle and consumes more of this liquid gold. 2. I didn't see the need when using HP1000/HP1300 lubricants and grease for most part. The two places where I'd use 9010 (i.e. escape wheel and balance) receive Epilame in specific places... or the cap-jewel-setting of the balance suspends the oil sufficiently be capillary action (see my "conflict" about using Epilame on the balance jewels).  3. Lastly, and here I really wonder about yours and others' experiences: I felt that applying Epliame to the train jewels left them looking hazy (borderline dirty) compared to the (painstakingly achieved) sparkly clean results of my cleaning process. I just can't help but think that the Epilame residuals would mix with the oil and cause more friction/wear. I don't know.    simple: it'll stay there. It won't move any further. That's exactly what is happening if you epilame a cap stone. You end up placing the 9010 right on top of the epilame and the oil will sit nicely on that spot.
    • There are some parts on Ebay for the seiko 6020A, it may just be a waiting game for someone to strip one down, NOS will be more scarce . K would strip your movement down to the module then start looking at other seiko movement to see if that coil is used, then seek out a seiko part dealer. Also Retrowatches youtube owner Mike may give you some advice try him on his site . He also hangs around amateur watchmaking groups.
    • I would agree, in order to work harden something you need to exceed it's yield strength when it moves from the elastic zone to the plastic zone and you get permanent deformation and work hardening which is fairly close to its failure point, relatively speaking and dependent on the material/alloy of course. In theory you can load something constantly within its elastic range and not suffer work hardening issues.
×
×
  • Create New...