Jump to content

400 day clock pendulum spring.


ftwizard

Recommended Posts

I need to replace the pendulum spring (the one the balls hang on) on a 400 day clock. Does the new spring have to be exactly the same thickness, or can there be a bit of leeway.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If it is a wind up it is essential to have the right s/spring and the same goes for the length. Also the block that goes each side of the anchor (long stem) has to be in the correct position.  This book is the clockmakers/repairs bible when it comes to these clocks. A photo of the clock would be nice and one of the back plate.

The Horolovar 400-Day Clock Repair Guide 6th Edition By Charles Terwilliger

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Can you give a good photo  of the back plate and the height and width of the plate and we can look it up in the book oldhippy mentioned above and give you the correct size wire. But that is only half the job fitting everything onto the new wire has got to be in the exact positions too as a few mm out can be the difference between it working or not

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The spring is still in place, so I can measure it, but it’s such a small measurement, I wondered if it had to be exactly right, will one or two thou” either side matter that much?

Try and get it as close as you can. Any change in length and the clock will need regulating, to high = to fast, longer = to slow The clock also has a locking device so it still needs to be able to lock if moving with out kinking the s/spring. Make sure you don't bend the new spring 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks for the answers so far.

So, length wise, I can put it all back together exactly the same as it came out, no problem.

I just need to order the correct thickness. I've measured the existing one at 0.0020" would it matter if I bought a slightly thicker one, say 0.0025 or does it have to be precisely the same?

The reason being the measurement I take, may not be exactly right, being as it's such a small dimension.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, ftwizard said:

Thanks for the answers so far.

So, length wise, I can put it all back together exactly the same as it came out, no problem.

I just need to order the correct thickness. I've measured the existing one at 0.0020" would it matter if I bought a slightly thicker one, say 0.0025 or does it have to be precisely the same?

The reason being the measurement I take, may not be exactly right, being as it's such a small dimension.

If you can give us a good clear photo of the back plate sugggested by Tmuir, he will be able to look up the exact s/spring needed. Sorry I’m unable to do so as I no longer have my book.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It is essential that the spring is the correct thickness and the correct length. If you move away from the spec you will runout of adjustment. This book is a must for the 400 day clocks;

The Horolovar 400-Day Clock Repair Guide 6th Edition By Charles Terwilliger

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, oldhippy said:

If you can give us a good clear photo of the back plate sugggested by Tmuir, he will be able to look up the exact s/spring needed. Sorry I’m unable to do so as I no longer have my book.

 

 

Okay. I'll do that tomorrow. Thanks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That is what’s needed. I’ll tell you how the book works. Tmuir will look up Kundo, you have the designs of the back plate and the positions of all the holes which consist of the train wheel holes and the screw holes. It gives the s/spring the thickness and the position of the blocks and the length all in a diagram. So when it comes to fitting the new one you cut to length, line it up alongside the diagram fit the blocks in position. Fit into the clock and if all is well that’s it.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That looks like plate 1407H Kundo 4 ball midget clock circa 1965

Use 0.0022" (0.056mm) Horolovar you want.

Page 133  in the 10th edition if someone else wants to double check.

It should do 10 beats a minute when set correctly.

Make sure you mark out the exact dimensions and the placement of the parts on the spring, or you can buy a complete replacement unit '5F'

https://www.cousinsuk.com/product/kundo

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Tmuir said:

That looks like plate 1407H Kundo 4 ball midget clock circa 1965

Use 0.0022" (0.056mm) Horolovar you want.

Page 133  in the 10th edition if someone else wants to double check.

It should do 10 beats a minute when set correctly.

Make sure you mark out the exact dimensions and the placement of the parts on the spring, or you can buy a complete replacement unit '5F'

https://www.cousinsuk.com/product/kundo

Thank you so much for finding that information for me. Not only is it valuable data, but I've learnt a great deal also.

I'm going to get the spring material and rig it up myself. Simply because I've not done it before. I'll probably never do it again either.:)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Agree with oldhippy. I have repaired and serviced a lot of these 400 day clocks. Everything has to be as near perfect as possible for them to run. As oldhippy say very little lubrication is required. The suspension spring must be perfectly straight with no twists or kinks. It must also be in perfect beat or you will find it will only run for a few days. However I do like them a lot and the book I referred to in an earlier post is essential.

The Horolovar 400-Day Clock Repair Guide 6th Edition By Charles Terwilliger

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, clockboy said:

It must also be in perfect beat or you will find it will only run for a few days.

That's what's happening. How do I make sure it's in beat? I was just doing it by eye, didn't know it was so critical. I've only done watches up to now. Can I check it on the timegrapher?

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Another couple of questions if you don't mind. Where are those measurements taken from i.e.. from the centre of the pivot to the top of the fork, or from the bottom of the plate to bottom of the fork. I've set it as stated and the amplitude seems very low at about 170.

What would be a fair amplitude for this clock? Before I fiddled with it, it was about 280.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, ftwizard said:

Another couple of questions if you don't mind. Where are those measurements taken from i.e.. from the centre of the pivot to the top of the fork, or from the bottom of the plate to bottom of the fork. I've set it as stated and the amplitude seems very low at about 170.

What would be a fair amplitude for this clock? Before I fiddled with it, it was about 280.

What measurements are you referring too.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Picking up this side-tracked post again as I just removed a balance staff of a 1920's Omega (35,5L-T1) I was impressed by the way @Delgetti had his setup when he had to change out a balance-staff (https://www.watchrepairtalk.com/topic/28854-new-balance-staff-not-riveting-to-balance/page/2/#comment-244054 Not only that, but also the idea of removing the seat first before punching the staff out from the seat-side, avoiding the whole discussion of the rivet yes/no enlarging the hole. I didn't have the fancy clamps & tools Delgetti has, so I used my screw-head polishing tool. Initially I used #1500 grit diamond paste on the steel wheel, which kinda worked, but very slow. I changed to #800 grit diamond paste, which worked better, but still slow. Then I glued #240 sanding paper to the steel disk; That worked and the disk was hand-driven. Once close to the balance wheel, I took the sanding paper off and continued with #800 diamond paste. One can only do this when the balance wheel sits true on the staff and has no "wobble". I went on grinding until I saw some diamond paste on the rim of the balance wheel. This was as far as I could grind and it seemed that there wasn't much left of the seat. Carefully, with my staking set, I knocked the staff out. Turns out that the thickness of the seat left, now a small ring, was only 0.1mm. The balance wheel hole is in perfect shape and no damage done to the wheel at all. Of course, if the wheel has a "wobble" or isn't seated true on the balance staff, you can't get as close and there will be more left of the seat. In my case, it all worked perfect 🙂 I'm very happy how this worked for me 😊  
    • As is tradition, one step forward, two steps back. Got the board populated and soldered into place without any issues.   But no hum. So I started testing the coils with an ohmmeter. I got 5.84k ohms across D1 (from red to red in the picture below), which is as expected. But I'm getting an open circuit for the other drive coil and feedback coil, D2 and F1 (from green to each of the two yellows).   Since the movement was working with my breadboard setup, it implies I somehow broke the connection between the coils and the solder lugs. They're all the way at the bottom of the lugs, but maybe the heat migrated down and broke the connections? I guess it's possible it happened while cleaning the flux off, but I used a soft artist's brush and isopropyl alcohol. I did a lot of high magnification examination, and I don't see any issues, but let me know if you see anything I missed or if you can think of anything else I should check.
    • 1947 NOS Ambassador 'C'. Actually, the case came without the movement so the movement isn't NOS, but she sure is pretty.
    • Hi attached is the AS 20XX. Service sheet although there is no 2063 mentioned it may be of some use to you AS_AS 2060,1,2,6,4,6.pdf
    • one of the problems we have is visible versus invisible. For instance millennium disulfide another high pressure lubricant black in color. I was told by somebody worked for the Boeing company that they had a piston like device somewhere that has eight call it around it to grab it so it has to slide and in the collet has to grab. But if somebody puts that type of dry grease on where grease with that in it it embeds itself basically in the metal and they have to throw the whole part away they get use it all. So I suspect on all the dry powdery lubricants that they will go into all the basically microscopic cracks and crannies of the metaland that's where it is visually at least until you scrub it off your visually going to see it which is good because you want your lubrication the stay word is. But I'm sure it doesn't last forever on the metal it's just a really nice lubrication  
×
×
  • Create New...