Jump to content

What is wrong with this.


oldhippy

Recommended Posts

The clock is much later than the 1860 Stated by the seller, it has a modern replacement escapement, the top of the clock although the correct style is not original to the clock it is a different colour to the rest of the clock, the case may be bronze but the top is brass.

The movement is modern the hands would not be push fit for a old clock they would be held by a hand collet and pin on a period clock

Its a bit of a marriage of parts looking at it. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

wls1971. You have the two right answers. Replacement platform. The whole case is in fact brass and not bronze. Peanut goes to you. :D

 

You are wrong about the date. The movement is around1860. The push on hands are correct and are matching, the style is spade.   

 

A big thanks to all for taking part. Next time I will have to make it harder.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I was more wrong than right, how would you know if a case is bronze as opposed to brass what would be the tell tale signs of a bronze case ? I am currently reading carriage clocks by Charles Allix and Peter Bonnert I shall have to study some more I have a lot to learn.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

51 minutes ago, wls1971 said:

I was more wrong than right, how would you know if a case is bronze as opposed to brass what would be the tell tale signs of a bronze case ? I am currently reading carriage clocks by Charles Allix and Peter Bonnert I shall have to study some more I have a lot to learn.

A picture would be the colour. If you had it to handle it would be the weight. Solid  bronze would be much heavier.  

English Giant c/clocks that have the case made of bronze are a hell of a weight. I used to wonder why are they called c/clocks its because of their style. A petite lady would have trouble lifting one.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, omx5o said:

You can learn a lot from these quizzes.

I was going to say that the key was missing. Not a major problem though.

 

I am glad you enjoy them. The key is an important item. Very valuable clocks that have their original key can add to their price. While we are still on the subject of C/Clocks the original travel case can also add to their value, so can the original glass panels.

Any part of a clock that needs to be replaced should be catalogued for the customer,  the old piece handed back. It is also a good idea to tell the owner to keep the old parts with the clock.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

32 minutes ago, clockboy said:

Got me. However I did notice the hairspring seems to be sitting out of centre so I doubt if it is running that well.

I thought it looked pretty sick when you consider it’s a new platform.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Just installed it on my iPhone (my only iOS device) and it appears to be intact and functional. I may have to go out and buy myself an ipad just for this app.
    • I have two Seitz sets, one ancient (with the 3mm anvils) and one just old (with 4mm anvils) plus a collection of spare pushers of assorted vintage. Not one of them is marked with it's size. Something which I have found very irritating when I have been using the tool and not returning pushers to their correct place in the tray every time as it means that I have to get the calipers out and measure them. These were bought as sets and collectively I have over 100 pushers so it would seem highly unlikely (if not inconceivable) that they are all cheap knock offs, especially as they are old enough to pre-date the prevalence of the Chinese knock off industry (at least as applied to watch making tools). I therefore believe them to be original Seitz parts. And there is no numbering. The shape of the bottom of the pump pushers is the same as your photo. The only thing that may not be the same is that the slotted insert (looks like a screw but is in fact a bayonet) should be brass. Yours looks the same colour as the steel but that could just be the lighting.
    • The original database is available on iOS devices here: https://apps.apple.com/fi/app/ranfft-watch-movements-archive/id6502008939
    • I no longer have my set so I can't help anymore sorry. Many on here have the set as its a must have tool for watch making/ repair.
    • It needs to be stirred before use and that makes it feel a lot thinner than when in the bottle. Does it feel as thin as 9010 after stirring it? I guess not! Yes, it's strange! I don't know, but if it is on impact it would make sense.
×
×
  • Create New...