Jump to content

Watchmakers lathe collets


maclerche

Recommended Posts

Then I finally bought a watchmaker lathe that is on the way with the mail. Now I have to buy some collets for the machine!

If money was not a problem, I would ...

Buy schaublin B8 71-137 from 0.3 to 8.0 mm or Bergeon 03 to 8.0 mm.
Unfortunately, the money is not that easy so look for alternatives ..
There are some Chinese sets of all sizes, approx. 77 pieces for approx. 500 pounds. Are they worth throwing money after?
Next option is Vector, which is negotiated by bla. Boley they can be acquired for approx. 38 pounds each.

What do you use and what would you advise ... The machine can take 8mm. B8 or WW collets!

salespic1.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I quite often see second-hand 8mm collets on ebay. Look out for strained collets, these are ones that have been forced to take a larger size then they should, they will be out of shape. Others I have seen that do not close evenly and have a raised edge around the centre. Rusted ones I would leave them.

I had a watchmakers Boley lathe with a full set of collets, so I never needed to buy.

Thats a nice looking lathe you have.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, maclerche said:

No, it takes "normal" 8mm. watchmakers collets B8 and WW types! 

You can read a'lot more about this machine here https://watchmaking.weebly.com/cowells-90cw.html and here http://www.cowells.com/90cw.htm 

Ok, well I strongly recommend getting an ER collet set if the collets match the standard “Boley” profile.

https://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/282388953876 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Regarding to ER collets!

The Cowells 90CW (newer ones after 2005) Has a spindle nose with 3 M4 holes. In these holes it is possible to mount an adapter so that the nose gets a thread M14 x1 That way it is possible to mount a chuck. This adapter can be ordered at special dimensions, such as fits a Sherline chuck too and you can get it with center in MT0 And I'd actually thought to get it done so it's a holder for ER8 or ER11 which also features super præsice. The disadvantage of ER collets is that they are designed to hold tools and preferably have material throughout their length or min. 3/4 of the length! A watchmaker collet can hold quite small pieces! But ER is definitely a good option to have too!

http://www.cowells.com/Gallery/CW-headstock.jpg

http://www.cowells.com/Gallery/G13.jpg

https://www.shop-apt.co.uk/er-collets-super-precision-0005mm-runout.html

Edited by maclerche
Link to comment
Share on other sites

ER collets: well, they are very nice to use, and make the choice of collet for the work simpler as they tend to work over a wide range (often 0.5 or 1mm for the smaller types). 

So, I can survive with just 9 collets to cover 0.5 - 5.0mm range. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, rodabod said:

I should add that I also own a full set of split collets too. 

ER's can work and might be a solution; many use them on lathe's.  But to compare between them, ER's are for tool holding and split collets are preferred for work holding.   A general view is that split collets hold with better alignment and concentricity than ER's; as ER's were meant for tool holding (TIR matters slightly less)  I won't argue too strongly on that one, a lot probably comes down to the quality of manufacture vs form factor, but I would expect a quality split collet to have the least run out.

The main reason though, is holding shorter pieces.  A split collet will hold work properly with only a short length to grip, whereas ER collets are suppose to be able to grip essentially along their length; they don't maintain alignment or concentricity nearly as well as a split collet with short work pieces....which I would think would often happen.  Again, part of the design legacy as a tool holding collet.

imo its really important to have minimal run out, especially with this small work.  1/2 a thou TIR might be ok on a 2" dia piece, but if you're making a balance staff with a 3 thou pivot, its not.  Precision is expensive, I believe its solidly in the get what you pay for category.  Not wanting to or able to spend $38 per collet, I've always chosen to used ones in good shape made in the developed world: Swiss, German, British, American.  Well truth be told, I've only bought lathes that come with good sets, but these collets are a pleasure to use and not too expensive.  Ebay can be a good source, although I prefer to buy in person so I can see them.  Ebay does have the advantage of the return policy if an unscrupulous vendors ships a set of beaters. 

 

Edited by measuretwice
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Interesting and good info.  Do you happen to know if they were referring to the collets which come with their lathe package https://www.ebay.com/itm/New-Unused-Mini-Precision-Watchmaker-Lathe/282991424601?hash=item41e39a7459:g:9WAAAOSwM0FXIAbV

 

or did they refer to these which are available separately https://www.ebay.com/itm/77-Pieces-Collets-for-8MM-for-Watchmakers-Lathe/401089759992?hash=item5d62d00af8:g:-ggAAOSwZ8ZW6fio

 

Thanks

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, mbhorology said:

Interesting and good info.  Do you happen to know if they were referring to the collets which come with their lathe package https://www.ebay.com/itm/New-Unused-Mini-Precision-Watchmaker-Lathe/282991424601?hash=item41e39a7459:g:9WAAAOSwM0FXIAbV

or did they refer to these which are available separately https://www.ebay.com/itm/77-Pieces-Collets-for-8MM-for-Watchmakers-Lathe/401089759992?hash=item5d62d00af8:g:-ggAAOSwZ8ZW6fio

These identical. No different manufacturing for a same product.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Hello, I am about 5 months into watchmaking and I love it!   The attention to precise detail is what really attracts me to it. (and the tools!) I am working on a 16 jewel 43mm pocket watch movement.   There are no markings besides a serial number (122248) .  The balance staff needs replacement. The roller side pivot broke off.  I successfully removed the hairspring using Bergeon 5430's.  I successfully removed the roller using Bergeon 2810.   Did i mention I love the tools?! I removed the staff from the balance wheel using a vintage K&D staff removal tool  with my Bergeon 15285 (that's the one that comes with a micrometer adjustment so it can be used as a jewel press as well as a traditional staking tool...it's sooooo cool...sorry..  can you tell i love the tools?) No more digressing..  I measured the damaged staff in all the relevant areas but I have to estimate on some because one of the pivots is missing. A = Full length  A= 4.80mm  (that's without the one pivot...if you assume that the missing pivot is the same length as the other pivot (I'm sure it's not)  then A = 5.12 mm...(can I assume 5.00mm here?) F=  Hair spring collet seat  F=  .89mm   (safe to assume .90 here? .. I am sure that my measurement's would at least contain  .01 mm error ?) G = balance wheel seat  G = 1.23 mm  (1.20mm?) H  =  roller staff  H =  .59mm  (.60 mm?) B  = bottom of the wheel to roller pivot   B  = 2.97mm  (3.00 mm?)     here I am estimating  again because this pivot is missing. So my friends, and I thank you profusely,  can you point me in the right direction as to how to proceed? Do i buy individual staffs?  or an assortment?   Since I don't know exactly the name of the manufacturer, will that be a fatal hindrance?   Tbh, I'm not even sure what country of origin this movement is. Thank you!    
    • Thats why i asked that question earlier, what happens if lubrication is placed directly on top of epilame ?  As opposed to walled within its non epilamed area . I'm not saying its right, i have no idea , just asking questions. 
    • thinking of where epilam should be removed did you know there was a patent that covers this? At least for the escapement I'm attaching it. GB1057607A-1 epilame.pdf
    • Back home...printing now.  Will report results
    • Oh well, if Master @nickelsilver says it's the way to go, then it is the way to go! I stand corrected! 🫡 Are there any other places where you're supposed to remove the epilame from the contact point of rubbing? I don't think so! Thanks for the effort @Neverenoughwatches, much appreciated! 🙂👍
×
×
  • Create New...