Jump to content

ETA 2783 - helical stem


Recommended Posts

I have not one but two ETA 2783 based watches ... both of which need new stems.

These stems seem special in that they are helical i.e. the rectangular section at the end of the stem is twisted. Cousins lists them as 'Obsolete' and whilst I see some on ebay the price seems high for a stem (partly driven by the fact that none are UK based so postage is a factor).

So my first question is why a helical stem? This might well answer my second question which is ... could I 'get away' with a normal stem if I managed to find one that could fit? And, thirdly, does anyone know of a better (UK) source of 2783 stems?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

36 minutes ago, WatchMaker said:

So my first question is why a helical stem? This might well answer my second question which is ... could I 'get away' with a normal stem if I managed to find one that could fit? 

The helical is needed to properly tension when quick-changing date. From our forum: 

Quote

  I have been so incredibly frustrated- these watches (I bought from hong kong) had wrong stems- (they had 2824 stems and I didn't realize there was a difference---there is), and these springs were not tensioned, so the date wheel would randomly move from one number to the next.  

https://www.watchrepairtalk.com/topic/5728-eta-278384-partsassembly-question/

Then you can go with Marc's excellent guide:

https://www.watchrepairtalk.com/topic/1924-eta-2783/

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, oldhippy said:

They are supposed to increase pressure of the sliding pinion against the winding pinion. You should be able to use the common type providing the sliding pinon is square.

No, you cant't. See above.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks oldhippy ... I did come across http://www.windingstems.com/eta.php in a web search but the 2783 comes up with a 'Free Quote' icon rather than a buy price indicating it's not readily available. I didn't think they'd be so elusive!

Thanks jdm ... I had tried to do some due-diligence before posting my question and had come across the 'parts assembly question' you've kindly linked for me. As I read this though the OP had 2783 movements with 2824 stems. I'm not surprised there were then issues as windingstems gives them very different dimensions as per pic below.

I will of course always try and use the correct parts so my question was more a theoretical one for a plan B on whether there's merit sifting  through the hundreds of spare stems I have to try and find one that matches a broken 2783 example albeit without the helical twist.

stem_comparison.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, WatchMaker said:

As I read this though the OP had 2783 movements with 2824 stems. I'm not surprised there were then issues as windingstems gives them very different dimensions as per pic below.

Thanks for posting the comparison. You are looking at the original 2824, but that OP probably had a 2824-2 stem, which has sizes
A=75
E=315
B=110
C=110
D=90
F=39

That is much closer to a 27xx stem, and may almost fit.

BTW, there is also an error for the 2824. Size E is supposed to be A+B+<dimension not specified>, but it reports A+B=160 with E=114.

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 years later...


  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • You often see the term used on old watch part boxes.  Staffs for bracelet watches, timing washers for bracelet wstches etc.
    • The Boro has changed quite a lot over the last 20 years, and not for the better. I actually moved out of the town 15 years ago to a small village not far away. Thanks for the pdf! Looks a great read. I'll get it printed today and put it on my work bench!
    • Not having all the fancy equipment, this is a way I came up with. I never said it was the best, the most ideal or the safest way. Working on balances is always a delicate task whereby full concentration & common sense should prevail. I was well aware of the "dangers" / short comings involved, hence my "warnings", as quoted above. The balance wheel of the Omega was nice true, flat and one could clearly see how much gap there was left before the grinding wheel would touch the balance wheel. I stopped when the generously applied diamond paste started to touch the rim of the balance wheel, which turned out to be with a seat thickness left of 0.1mm. Tapping the remainder of the staff out went easy and flawless. My idea of penning this article was to show/share a way which, in my case, perfectly succeeded. If deemed to risky, or if the balance wheel is not true or has a wobble, other methods have to be followed.
    • I loved his explanation of a teardown 😅 Ex military Richard Perrett, pretty knowledgeable guy.
    • I also see a bit of danger for the wheel, at least you have to keep away from it and may get a too thick rest ring. My rest rings are about 0.05 mm. Better way would be a grinding wheel touching the staff with its circumference. Frank
×
×
  • Create New...