Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Hi, I am rapidly becoming a Seiko nut, I would be interested to know if given the choice of any three Seiko watches past or present, what would your choices be ? 

Posted

Do you know of the Seiko forum on WUS, or thewatchsite.com? Hundreds of models presented and discussed.
However you will be told SKX007/9, SARB033/5, maybe an Alpinist, these are the well know ones.

  • Like 1
Posted

BUT, the great thing about Seiko is they have released thousands of not tens of thousands of different models from plain to funky and everything in between. So plenty for everyone without resorting to all having the same models as each other.

Check out the Vanac range or some of the Lord Matics.

This is mine [emoji4]
aE7BbaL.jpg

  • Thanks 1
Posted

Yes that's the beauty of Seiko there are so many to choose from, there is no shortage of iconic models still out there waiting to be found. 

Posted

The big factor Johnnie is your budget. You can pick up a decent Seiko automatic for £20 or the most I have seen is just over £20k (which was a well known collector buying a model lots of people didn't believe existed in real life from Japan). I'm much nearer the first number unfortunately!

I'd suggest that you visit instagram, type #seiko or #seikoaddict or #seikolife, start scrolling and make notes and start doing research on the ones that speak to you.

But my main advice would be: Run! And don't look back! Once you start on the Seiko habit it is very addictive...

  • Like 2
Posted

Hi Pip, thanks for replying. Yes there is a Seiko to suit everyone's pocket. I am trying to build a list of say 15/25 Seiko's to look for, probably Diver's watches. 

Posted

Well if you want to start budget, SKX007 or SKX009 (the 009 is the pepsi bezel one) which has a 7S26 movement. Or if you go a bit more you can get a 777 which is hacking and hand wind and just a better watch. Or you can stretch to turtles, or to a marine master, or the beautiful SLA017 which is the modern ltd edition interpretation of the 62MAS, or you can go down the rabbit hole that is vintage - and let's leave quartz out of it for now as that's a whole other list... even if you just restrict to divers you can spend pretty much whatever you have!

Whatever you get, post pics, I do love a Seiko! 

  • Like 2
Posted

Hi Pip. I am only just starting to realise the depth and breadth of the Seiko range, by goggling the above suggestions I am looking at watches I didn't know existed, amazingly some for very little money and also for a lot more. 

  • 3 weeks later...
Posted
On December 21, 2017 at 9:34 AM, rogart63 said:

6309-7040/6138-8020 and if no money is the limit 6159-7000 . But that is something that change from time to time. 

I can agree with these choices for starters although I like the 6309 - 7049 a bit more then the 6309 - 7040 . A little wider cushion .

Both classic beauties .

6309 - 7040….

5a51b04daec9c_ScreenShot2018-01-06at7_29_14PM.thumb.png.0a0a4fd386ef56219e7030c255e4b322.png

5a51b07b9c47b_ScreenShot2018-01-06at7_28_46PM.thumb.png.9d4ef43b440e05bf74799d674b8c0399.png

 

6309 - 7049…..

5a51b1a93ead0_ScreenShot2018-01-06at7_34_50PM.png.b00bf5b56e3b45cda6b94aefc5a6b697.png

5a51b1cf73e2f_ScreenShot2018-01-06at7_33_47PM.png.7b1f40d825c5088fcc2ad8953665c9d9.png

  • Like 1
Posted

6309-7040, 6105-8110 and 6138-0011

i guess I am biaised as I  happen to own all three (and a few more) but they are real classics.

if i could add to the list it would be the 6138-8020, panda dial, i have been looking for a nice original one for a while

 

  • Like 1

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Link below shows the tool used to push the stud out. You can make the tool , just file a screwdriver to this shape.  https://www.esslinger.com/bergeon-16918-etachron-stud-remover-screwdriver/ There are vids on YouTube showing how the stud is to be  push out. Shouldn't get over creative, just go by this approach.  Good luck.
    • I tried pushing to dome the washer in and had no success, but stuffing it full of o-ring gaskets worked much better than I expected. It takes some pressure but not as much as you might imagine, but it does take patience ... and a couple of dozen small gaskets. I used the pendant tube of a watch case to stuff the gaskets in as I didn't have a way to machine a tool to suit.
    • I can't answer your question, sorry, but you probably don't what to transfer the spring to a new wheel. Springs and wheels are paired ("vibrated" together) to get the right timing and transferring the spring to a new wheel is quite likely to see you minutes per day out with no way to correct it. Some may tell you to replace the balance staff, but if you're a beginner you're probably better off sourcing a replacement "balance complete" if you can: staff, roller, wheel and spring already assembled as a unit.
    • I'm sure it's the ancien. My measurements: A = 342. The slight bend in the pivot would make much less than a thousandth of a mm difference to this so I don't think 348 is plausible unless there has been significant wear on the pivots. B is hard to measure without first removing the balance wheel. I measured to the other side of the balance wheel as best I could (263) then subtracted the thickness of the wheel (69) to get 194. This could easily be three or four hundredths out, so 195 looks right. (196 could also be right.) J couldn't be measured. I did my best to measure where the balance wheel has been riveted on and got about 95, so 85 before riveting is plausible. (60 is not.) G again couldn't be measured without first removing the roller. I get 37 where the staff emerges from the roller so 41 at the other end of the taper seems plausible. (43 is also plausible to me.) K = 60. (Definitely larger than 55.)   I've never replaced a balance staff; it'll be a new adventure for me. I'll have to read up on how to maximise my chance of removing the old one without damaging the balance wheel without having access to a lathe. I also need to explore how to remove the roller without damaging it. I won't actually place an order until I've gone through the rest of the movement. With the number of issues I've already found, I'll be amazed if I don't have more surprises in store. There are some watch part suppliers in Australia but nothing like Cousins or Otto Frei or Jules Borel. AllTimeCo is fine for basic parts for modern watches: batteries, bands, some crowns, stems, seals, movements, some tools, etc., but not really anything for vintage watches. Australian Jewellers Supplies is similar. Cousins charges about £9 for shipping to Australia which is about AU$19 and not too bad (considering Australian parcel post is $11) but I still want to minimise the number of times I'm paying it. I need to explore other options closer to home. There may be something in Singapore or China that would have what I want and ship it faster/more economically.  
    • Hi, I just finished the service of a Rolex 3135. Amplitude is great, 295 degrees horizontal after 2 hours and 280 after 12 hours. Vertical positions are 25 degrees down on those. I am however seeing a rate variation with temperature. I have 0 SPD on wrist, say 38 degrees and +7 SPD at 18 degrees room temperature. That equates to +0.35 SPD which is within spec I believe (+-0.5 SPD/ Deg C max). It just seems more than I would expect from such a high quality movement. To put that in context, I see similar rate variation with temperature for a Seiko 7S26. Just wondering what you guys see. Thanks, Steve.
×
×
  • Create New...