Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

I was at my local watch and clock makers association meeting on the weekend and during a discussion after the meeting was finished one member raised a point that old (250 years or older) and valuable clocks or timepieces should not be cleaned with modern cleaning solutions because it could ruin them. He was taking it to mean it could damage the material the item was made from.

I have a slightly different take on this, yes the alloy of brass and quality of steel (iron) will be different to modern items, but I don't think it would so much damage it as maybe remove some of its history. Such as marking out lines from when it was made, also I would feel returning a 300 year old clock to 'as new' condition would be wrong and it should preserve its patina. There is obviously exceptions to this where an item is so far gone where restoration is the only option, but I would say in general a more conservative cleaning would be in order.

Just thought this might be an interesting topic to discuss.

I will add that I have not touched nor do I see myself working on a rare and valuable clock / timepiece in the near future.

Edited by Tmuir
correct spelling mistakes
  • Like 1
Posted

There is a train of thought amongst some clock repairers that ammonia based cleaners should not be used on older movements because it can cause stress fractures to form in brass plates  due to the process used to make them on older clocks by hammering brass plate to the correct thickness rather than rolling on more modern movements thus putting the brass under stress, but I think most are happy to use them as long as the parts cleaned are rinsed well after cleaning and exposure to them is limited.

Posted (edited)

Not a clock repairer but I would lean on whatever was best and most safe and effective to clean the hidden functional parts for that particular clock (so yes by all means consider changing cleaning method if you're worried about causing cracks or such) should be prioritised over any sentiment historical or otherwise, for visible parts such as the face and hands obviously a different mindset is necessary and I would say virtually no cleaning is the ideal (to preserve the patina) unless it's gotten to an extreme where no one would want to look at it and then you're looking at restoring. But I'm not really familiar with clock making practices, it's possible minor feats of re enameling and painting and chemical cleaning are used on the face is standard practice. 

Where's Clockboy :D

Edited by Ishima
Posted

Could be hard finding 250 year old cleaning solutions:) But i think if you are a watchmaker that work on this old clocks you should now how to work on them and now which tools and cleaners that would be right. 

Posted

This is a bit of a minefield. Some say it does some say it does not.

There is a big difference in a repair and a restore. You should never restore something that does not need restoring.

Very old brass is extremely hard and can be a sod just too even ream out, it can and will take the edge of a reamer/broach it also has tiny pockets of air which some say clock cleaning solutions can get into the pockets and the brass becomes inferior over time. I have yet to see such a thing, just how much time do they expect?  A lot depends on the type of clock, how it looked when it was new. A restore should never be different in any way from when it was new. If parts were not polished then they should never be polished now. Any marks in the plates never should be removed or polished out, this is why you should never use any type of electric machine when it comes to polishing and everything should be undertaken by hand.

Brasso is what I used to clean the plates and if parts were to be polished then a cloth would be used. All parts washed out in petrol and dried in sawdust, brushed clean to remove sawdust and French chalked, applied with a very clean brush, the chalk is taken to the brush. I had a hand soft bristle brush just for this work. French chalk stopes tarnish. If a dial is in a bad way and the customer agrees to a restore, the dial is restored to its original appearance, the same applies to the case.

This is a very basic run through.  

  • Like 1
Posted

Thanks for that oldhippy.

I recently purchased a watch makers handbook published in 1882 when I get a moment I will scan the pages on cleaning as it makes for some interesting reading, it talks about french chalk and brushing, but also using bread and charred bone, which neither of the last two are in my cleaning kit. :D

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Yep…This makes perfect sense. With that large a gap in the serial numbers, they were almost certainly machined on different equipment, hence one should have no expectation of any cross-batch compatibility. I’ll revert to the original bridge. Regarding bending the bridge @nevenbekriev, I’ll give it a try, but I may have to buy some better calipers. My Vernier calipers are only accurate to 0.1mm. Not very accurate. 
    • Yes, what I wanted to say is that the cock is part of the main plate, manufactured together with it and not meant to be interchangeable. Even if the other cock gets in place, it is not sure that the balance then will stay upright. You should use the original cock when it exists and is not destroyed. The adjustment needed by bending it is not irreversible. It is minimal deforming that is needed. No tools are needed. I have pointed to all needed references here for the balance staff endshake checking and correctness confirmation. The only tool needed for the correction is You thumb. The cock must be fixed on the main plate, no need of special plate with holes and so on. If You will feel more confident, then measure with Vernier caliper the height of the top of the cock where the stones are against the main plate bottom when the shim is fitted and try to reach the same height when bending the cock (with no balance in place!!!) Caliper with screw for fixing is perfect.    
    • Thanks for the reply. I polished the head of the screw using 1500 to 10000 lapping paper and a screw polisher. This is why I think the head blued and the rest of the screw didn't. Silly question, how do you polish the whole screw inc threads, if that's what it needs to blue? 100% clean, Elna red and heated ultrasonic bath + IPA rinse. Finally, there is definitely heat leak as there's about a 30c difference between the brass bed and the soldering station temp. Having said that, the bed temp was stable. I will try to search out a better brass pot, but I haven't found one yet, hence the stainless steel bowl. 
    • Agreed but that's where WD40 excels, water displacement. 
    • I would change the container to a thick walled brass one to start with. Looking at you screw pictures they don’t look shiny enough, really it’s best to do a black polish on them before trying. Also make sure once polished they are scrupulously clean, I dunk my experiments in acetone before bluing.   i think the thin walled stainless container to leach away the heat from the shavings, most successful bluing videos for example use thick walled brass to hold a good deep amount of shavings which acts as a better holder of heat.   Tom
×
×
  • Create New...