Jump to content

Seiko 7S26A Complete Service Walkthrough


Recommended Posts

OK just looked at the timeograph reading and not much amiss wondering if it,s just the mainspring is not winding fully.

 

How the MS could not wind fully after more than 10 turns at the barrell? Now it has stopped again with a full charge.

 

I went back to the other one which has an even smaller amplitude, and is still going. It kind of works albeit with large sweeps in rate within one timegrapher screen interval. I'm sure it's not worth to be cased anyway.

post-1542-0-31555800-1448801885_thumb.jp

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi Scotty,

 

Sorry, we were waiting for your input as you promised in your last post. In my mind, the problem you have is a shorted hairspring. It may be a number of reasons. Oil in the coils, coils touching, etc. Since you already demagnetized it then I would immerse it in lighter fluid and check again. Of course, before anything I will inspect that all coils are perfectly concentric without touching. If touching you will have to "repair" it. Mark has a good series of videos of how to go about it.

 

Cheers,

 

Bob

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi jdm,

 

As CB said, in Seikos, amplitude is not too great. So, your primary goal is to make them work continuously in all positions. Remember, if running fast, most likely it is a shorted hairspring. In your case, I suspect the pivots. They could be rusted, bent or broken. This may be an issue detected when the watch runs in one position but doesn't in another, usually an oposite. Also, check for fork jewels misaligned, worn, and/or broken...or similar problem in the balance/impulse jewel. Those are critical areas for the watch to work properly given that the rest is OK.

 

Hopefully, it is just a little overlooked detail. It sometimes happens that we are so focused on the Gremlins that a little thing may just pass us by. Happens all the time. Remember magnetism is one of those we overlook...and some demagnetizers (read cheap) might add the magnetism.

 

Cheers,

 

Bob

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi Bob,

 

Thanks for replying. I haven't got to it yet but remember this is a 7s36C and the complete balance assembly is the only thing I left untouched. I dismantled everything else, along with soaking, cleaning & oiling where necessary. Since I didn't

oil the balance assembly either I don't see where oil on the h.s. could have happened. I don't think I damaged it but I'll keep checking. How could the h.s. have shortened? When I get to it I'll try soaking the hairspring too. Again, this is my 1st

overhaul & I thought it would be a good idea to step away for a bit. I do have a question. Is it possible for it to continually run with the roller jewel not seated correctly? Could that be the problem? I'm thinkin no. Thanks again Bob!

 

Cheers,

Scotty

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Difficult but I suppose that's not impossible if something is bent or out of shape. I've never had that problem myself. Maybe when manipulating the balance assembly the hairspring got out of shape or some debris/oil drop fell on the hairspring proper, shorting it. (Sorry, not shortening I meant shorting). Just look for out of shape and/or touching coils.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Here are some shots of the balance assembly in the mainplate. I used a blower to spin it & it seems to oscillate smooth coming to a slow stop. I couldn't see any sticking. I also looked @ another 7s36

& they look the same (Oscillating & @ a dead stop). I guess It's my inexperience & untrained eye. If anyone sees anything in these pics please let me know. Thanks!

 

Scotty

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Jdm, avoid using alcohol particularly around the balance & pallet as it has a tendency to dissolve the shellac holding the jewels in place, as Bob rightly states lighter fluid is the safe option. I normally get amp readings of 240-270 on Seiko 6xxx & 7xxx series.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Jdm, avoid using alcohol particularly around the balance & pallet as it has a tendency to dissolve the shellac holding the jewels in place, as Bob rightly states lighter fluid is the safe option. I normally get amp readings of 240-270 on Seiko 6xxx & 7xxx series.

 

Thanks. Being aware of that, I didn't place pallet fork in alcohol. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm having trouble finalizing a post with pics on this topic.  HELP !!   :pulling-hair-out:

If you mean when yo are trying to attach a picture when replying.

(1) Click on the "More Reply Options" at the bottom right hand side.

post-124-0-41407800-1448918833_thumb.png

(2) Click on "Chose File" button and a drop down menu will appear.

post-124-0-16068100-1448918988_thumb.png

(3) Click on "Photo Library"

post-124-0-07475200-1448919166_thumb.png

(4) Select image.

post-124-0-09665200-1448919372_thumb.png

(5) Click on "Attach This File"

post-124-0-70501700-1448919481_thumb.png

(6) Click on "Add To Post"

post-124-0-89870200-1448919629_thumb.png

(7) Click on "Preview Post"

post-124-0-63088900-1448920118_thumb.png

(8) The picture should appear.

post-124-0-91596600-1448920232_thumb.png

(9) Finally click "Add Reply" and jobs done!

post-124-0-84950000-1448920521_thumb.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hope this works..........  I dont believe it !!  I thought I did this before. Must have missed something. Thanks Geo. Anyway, if anyone notices something wrong with the h.s. let me know. Thanks !

Scotty

 

 

 

post-1337-0-42119900-1448922120_thumb.jppost-1337-0-56872100-1448922180_thumb.jppost-1337-0-20363200-1448922192_thumb.jp

 

post-1337-0-89410300-1448922229_thumb.jppost-1337-0-56813900-1448922239_thumb.jppost-1337-0-84451200-1448922252_thumb.jp

Edited by SCOTTY
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's way off centre.

It might be magnetism or oil contamination causing it, but the end stud and regulator stud look very far out in their locations and could be pulling the spring over to that side. This is only a suggestion, so I hope someone else pitches in with other ideas.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's way off centre.

It might be magnetism or oil contamination causing it, but the end stud and regulator stud look very far out in their locations and could be pulling the spring over to that side. This is only a suggestion, so I hope someone else pitches in with other ideas.

Thanks. I understand. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Agree with the above the hairspring is the issue. It the pics are showing correct it is out of centre hence the low amplitude. I would first give it a good soak in "Horosove" or "One dip" 

       

As a side issue regarding amplitude. I have never achieved a really good amplitude with any of the Seiko,s I have serviced. It appears the pro repairers always seem to fit a new mainspring when servicing them & I wonder if this is the reason.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks. I understand. 

 

Stud and regulator appears to be in the normal position as they are in new movements delivered from factory. Remove balance, turn ir over and a take a pic with camera directly vertical over it. For better results, you can set the camera to maximum resolution, then cropthe  picture to center only. Also, leaving the balance cock on the table, pull the staff out if it, let it be near the jewel and check where it want to stay naturally, if on center or not.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi jdm,

 

Can you clarify the last sentence. I'm not sure what you mean - or the procedure -- but I'm really interested. Thank you in advance.

 

PS. if you have some way of illustrating it, it will be perfect!

 

Cheers,

 

Bob

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Can you clarify the last sentence. I'm not sure what you mean - or the procedure -- but I'm really interested. Thank you in advance.

 

PS. if you have some way of illustrating it, it will be perfect!

 

This is an hint I got a from a watchmaker which is quite active on various forums. The idea is that an hairspring which is not perfectly concentric will not naturally bring the balance staff to the jewel hole. I found that to be true. Just place cock or bridge upside down on the mat and check where the staff tends to go when lifted a tiny bit and let go. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites




  • Similar Content

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Good question!! Anyone know of a substitute movement??!! 🤔🙏
    • Interesting issue that I just noticed: this Seiko 5actus Watch from 1977 has a calibre listing on the dial of 7019-8030R but on the case back it says 7019-8010!! Like a mis-printed coin, is this watch therefore worth a lot of money for its rarity?? 🤪😲🤔🤪
    • I wish that was the case. The Aegler movements used in the early days by Wilsdorf & Davis (for brands like Rolex and Rolco) came in several sizes and without designated calibre numbers that survive.  They become a bit easier to identify during the 1920s. Below is an Aegler-Rebberg, 25.74mm in diameter. It’s from a woman’s Rolex wristwatch. Stamped Rebberg and 500 on the dial plate (but it isn’t a Rebberg 500, it’s the wrong size).  I’d be interested if anyone can identify the movement.  It is based off the Aegler Nr.1, circa 1903, but they based many many calibres of different sizes on it. The closest I have to a positive ID is the  ‘Rolex Nr.50’ circa 1917, but no dial side images or movement sizes are available in the references. There are identical looking movements in many sizes.  The 25.74mm of this movement is a particularly strange size for the era, it equates to 11.41 lignes.      Best Regards, Mark
    • It looks like this movement comes with a number of different shock settings. Emmywatch shows that it comes in versions with no shock settings, 'Incabloc', 'shock resist', and 'Supershock'. Perhaps the different settings position the impulse jewel/roller table in a non-ideal position relative to the pallet fork/guard pin. Are you able to check under high magnification if the pallet fork and roller table are able to operate without any interference? Just for fun I took a look and I have one FHF 70 in my collection, a West End Secundus with a non-shock protected FHF70. I had a note with the watch that said, "Movement is stamped 'FHF 70', but the FHF70 looks to have sub-seconds instead of center seconds movement (??)" but that a google search turned up both types for this movement. EDIT: I just took a look in my parts drawer and I have a few of these movements, both in center seconds and sweep seconds, but they all are non-shock protected.  
    • Any info on this watch would help. I know that it's sterling from London but I could not match the o letter date or make out makers mark.  Is the movement maker Camberwell or Lamberwell?   If I give it a twist it will run for about ten seconds.  $45 yard sale find.  I don't think that I want to service a fusee.  What quality is it?
×
×
  • Create New...