Jump to content

Regulating an Omega 684


Recommended Posts

I got this Omega 684 movement and it was keeping time to about 10 seconds a day but I've tested it now and it's gaining so much time and so out of beat the timegrapher is struggling to recognize it as a watch. I've poked the levers into every combination an it's still not working. What should I do now? Thanks for the help.

DSC_2659.thumb.JPG.b53a0edfb301f49f85722644d612d72b.JPG

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Titanium said:

I got this Omega 684 movement and it was keeping time to about 10 seconds a day but I've tested it now and it's gaining so much time and so out of beat the timegrapher is struggling to recognize it as a watch. I've poked the levers into every combination an it's still not working. What should I do now? Thanks for the help.

DSC_2659.thumb.JPG.b53a0edfb301f49f85722644d612d72b.JPG

What happened between the first time and now? If it's gaining it could be magnetized or it could be oil on the hairspring. From the picture I can see the watch is running, but are the coils touching? Looks like they are. Check your hairspring coils.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Are you sure the hairspring is between the 2 regulating pins on the regulating arm, if I remember correctly there is just 2 pins sticking down and the hairspring can actually jump out and rest against the wrong side of one of the pins, this would give an erratic reading.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, Titanium said:

I got this Omega 684 movement and it was keeping time to about 10 seconds a day but I've tested it now and it's gaining so much time and so out of beat the timegrapher is struggling to recognize it as a watch

so in between 10 seconds a day and not being recognized what changed? Did it do it all by itself or was it the results of you pushing the levers wildly around?

So the beat adjustment lever is interesting in that there is no plus or minus. this means we are moving it in one direction if you moving too fast or you're not careful you can go past zero. Then very very tiny amounts of movement or you can be extremely far out of beat. Then the timing machine is averaging if you move too fast you can exceed its ability to read which are doing and once again you can go way beyond where you want to be very effortlessly.

so puzzling your picture is the regulator is so close to the stud it seems like it would be extremely slow? so it's very hard to tell in the picture I'm wondering if the terminal curve is where it's supposed to be? If you get carried away with moving the levers it's always possible to bend a hairspring. It almost looks like the spring may be off-center. If it's off-center far enough which I can't tell from the photograph it may be it's bumping into the back side of the stud or even the regulator pins. That would make it run very very fast.

 

omega 683 684.JPG

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It is for sure a hairspring issue. Either it has become magnetised, distorted or oil/dirt is causing the coils to to stick together. The regulator is way to close to the end stud arm so it might be way of beat or the regulator has been moved to far. I suspect your poking around has put it a mile out of beat so that arm is the one to be moved. I suggest before any more moves use very good magnification to inspect the coils

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, clockboy said:

It is for sure a hairspring issue. Either it has become magnetised, distorted or oil/dirt is causing the coils to to stick together. The regulator is way to close to the end stud arm so it might be way of beat or the regulator has been moved to far. I suspect your poking around has put it a mile out of beat so that arm is the one to be moved. I suggest before any more moves use very good magnification to inspect the coils

I agree. Look at the coil. Then deal with the regulator arm. As many have mentioned, it is too close to the end stud.

 

J

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Alastair said:

Poor thing looks like it could well benefit from a really good service, cleaning and relub. Those pics make it look stinking dirty, some parts have even gone green!

During this work, the fault will prob be self evident...

Come now @Alistair, stinking dirty?!? it's not all that bad.... is it?

J

Link to comment
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, Alastair said:

Maybe its the pics, but to me--yes, it does look terribly dirty!

Omega plates, wheels etc--Sparkle when clean...

Yeah I agree, Omega makes beautiful copper-plated workings that gleam when clean. But Titanium is a newcomer, and to him this movement probably doesn't look that bad. As you said, maybe it's the pics.

J

Edited by noirrac1j
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It could do with a good service but I think even when cleaned the "green bits" on the edge of the plates I think he will find won't look much better, it looks like the oscillating wieght bearing/axle is worn (or at some point has been) and as it's been turning with too much play it has been catching the plates and damaged them, now the plating on the edge of the plates has worn off it won't ever look sparkling.

Link to comment
Share on other sites



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Picking up this side-tracked post again as I just removed a balance staff of a 1920's Omega (35,5L-T1) I was impressed by the way @Delgetti had his setup when he had to change out a balance-staff (https://www.watchrepairtalk.com/topic/28854-new-balance-staff-not-riveting-to-balance/page/2/#comment-244054 Not only that, but also the idea of removing the seat first before punching the staff out from the seat-side, avoiding the whole discussion of the rivet yes/no enlarging the hole. I didn't have the fancy clamps & tools Delgetti has, so I used my screw-head polishing tool. Initially I used #1500 grit diamond paste on the steel wheel, which kinda worked, but very slow. I changed to #800 grit diamond paste, which worked better, but still slow. Then I glued #240 sanding paper to the steel disk; That worked and the disk was hand-driven. Once close to the balance wheel, I took the sanding paper off and continued with #800 diamond paste. One can only do this when the balance wheel sits true on the staff and has no "wobble". I went on grinding until I saw some diamond paste on the rim of the balance wheel. This was as far as I could grind and it seemed that there wasn't much left of the seat. Carefully, with my staking set, I knocked the staff out. Turns out that the thickness of the seat left, now a small ring, was only 0.1mm. The balance wheel hole is in perfect shape and no damage done to the wheel at all. Of course, if the wheel has a "wobble" or isn't seated true on the balance staff, you can't get as close and there will be more left of the seat. In my case, it all worked perfect 🙂 I'm very happy how this worked for me 😊  
    • As is tradition, one step forward, two steps back. Got the board populated and soldered into place without any issues.   But no hum. So I started testing the coils with an ohmmeter. I got 5.84k ohms across D1 (from red to red in the picture below), which is as expected. But I'm getting an open circuit for the other drive coil and feedback coil, D2 and F1 (from green to each of the two yellows).   Since the movement was working with my breadboard setup, it implies I somehow broke the connection between the coils and the solder lugs. They're all the way at the bottom of the lugs, but maybe the heat migrated down and broke the connections? I guess it's possible it happened while cleaning the flux off, but I used a soft artist's brush and isopropyl alcohol. I did a lot of high magnification examination, and I don't see any issues, but let me know if you see anything I missed or if you can think of anything else I should check.
    • 1947 NOS Ambassador 'C'. Actually, the case came without the movement so the movement isn't NOS, but she sure is pretty.
    • Hi attached is the AS 20XX. Service sheet although there is no 2063 mentioned it may be of some use to you AS_AS 2060,1,2,6,4,6.pdf
    • one of the problems we have is visible versus invisible. For instance millennium disulfide another high pressure lubricant black in color. I was told by somebody worked for the Boeing company that they had a piston like device somewhere that has eight call it around it to grab it so it has to slide and in the collet has to grab. But if somebody puts that type of dry grease on where grease with that in it it embeds itself basically in the metal and they have to throw the whole part away they get use it all. So I suspect on all the dry powdery lubricants that they will go into all the basically microscopic cracks and crannies of the metaland that's where it is visually at least until you scrub it off your visually going to see it which is good because you want your lubrication the stay word is. But I'm sure it doesn't last forever on the metal it's just a really nice lubrication  
×
×
  • Create New...