Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Hi guys,

 

I'm working on a Longines 12.68z, which at some point have gotten some water inside the movement. The ratchet wheel, crown wheel and winding pinion all have some corrosion on them, see pictures.

 

859020f88c4a20c0bdf3dd137b97ec48.jpg5a58173234597eb7318292d20189bd16.jpg

 

Two questions to you: would you replace these parts? And to clean these types of parts, do you only use pegwood and cleaning fluid or also metal like an old screwdriver or such?

 

Thanks,

Stian

 

Sent from my VIE-L09 using Tapatalk

 

 

Posted

Depends on if you want it to look good or just run good? would probably work okay if you clean it?

Maybe use a glassfiber scratch brush to clean it with? 

Posted

Yep its amazing what you can achieve with pegwood and a fiber brush time and a Bit of hard work.20160413_232101.thumb.jpg.035e1d0887953e2ce98027bbc77c8712.jpg20160416_171409.thumb.jpg.81aa7e07541eaef34257802099f799a2.jpg

  • Like 1
Posted

I agree with old hippy if you can replace.  if not soak in really strong tea for couple of days and then give them a clean (perhaps with a fibre brush) and see if they are usable. 

Posted

I supose in the days when these movements where in current production it would have been a simple and reliativley cheap option to replace the parts, but with vintage watches it comes down to what parts are and what parts are not available in this case cousins have the ratchet wheel listed at £14.24 and as far as I can see all other parts you need are obsolete there are of course other sources of parts and they may have the parts you need but then it comes down to cost and how much you are willing to pay

The parts are never going to be asthetically good as new but they should clean up very well you have nothing to lose by cleaning them up, as Clockboy has already stated strong cold tea solution works it is a mild tanic acid that works on the rust. A simple way to make a very strong tea solution is place a tea bag in a cup of cold water in the microwave for 3 minutes on high the solution produced is far stronger than brewing alone can produce and works well on rust do not move the cup from the microwave or stir with a spoon until it has cooled down.

I have cleaned up parts far worse than those you have shown by using tea. I had a J.W.Benson watch where the clutch wheel and winding pinnion and winding stem had rusted together and could not be parted I had to soak them in tea and give them a blast in the ultrasonic cleaner they cleaned up better than I could have hoped and got the watch running parts where not available so the only option was to try.

 

  • Like 1
Posted
I supose in the days when these movements where in current production it would have been a simple and reliativley cheap option to replace the parts, but with vintage watches it comes down to what parts are and what parts are not available in this case cousins have the ratchet wheel listed at £14.24 and as far as I can see all other parts you need are obsolete there are of course other sources of parts and they may have the parts you need but then it comes down to cost and how much you are willing to pay

The parts are never going to be asthetically good as new but they should clean up very well you have nothing to lose by cleaning them up, as Clockboy has already stated strong cold tea solution works it is a mild tanic acid that works on the rust. A simple way to make a very strong tea solution is place a tea bag in a cup of cold water in the microwave for 3 minutes on high the solution produced is far stronger than brewing alone can produce and works well on rust do not move the cup from the microwave or stir with a spoon until it has cooled down.

I have cleaned up parts far worse than those you have shown by using tea. I had a J.W.Benson watch where the clutch wheel and winding pinnion and winding stem had rusted together and could not be parted I had to soak them in tea and give them a blast in the ultrasonic cleaner they cleaned up better than I could have hoped and got the watch running parts where not available so the only option was to try.


Fabulous advice, thanks a lot! I will give it a try and see if I can improve the surface of these parts.

Stian

Sent from my VIE-L09 using Tapatalk

Posted

They won't be stainless... in any case stainless wouldn't have rusted that badly.

They look like they will clean up nicely, but the ratchet wheel is available from Cousins if you have a problem with that

Posted
They won't be stainless... in any case stainless wouldn't have rusted that badly.

They look like they will clean up nicely, but the ratchet wheel is available from Cousins if you have a problem with that


Haha, your post made me facepalm from my own question. Indeed stainless wouldn't stain like that :)

I'll go ahead with the pegwood and fiber brush, thanks for all the help!

Stian

Sent from my VIE-L09 using Tapatalk

Posted

Whenever I removed rust using mechanical methods I was able to remove the rust to a point where I could no longer detect it on the part. When I put the part under a microscope there were still thousands of microscopic rust pits in the steel. This explained why, over time, the rust would come back. When I removed the rust with electrolysis, and examined the part with a microscope, the small pits where still there but the microscopic bits of rust were gone. Using electrolysis seemed to remove all of the rust. 

david 

  • Like 2
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • just a reminder about this test is it's not a perfect test it's a quick test. In other words you can adjust the banking pins that are both the same and visually this test will pass everything looks the same but both banking pins can be in the wrong place. although the majority of time when people are playing with banking pins I don't put them in the same place. one of things have to be careful of is I believe some of the pallet fork measuring tools that actually give you the roller jewel size are actually size so that I get confused? What I mean by this is if you inserted a whatever size in and are always told to go a slightly smaller I thought that the gauge itself its number corresponded to give you the exact number. So a lot of it depends upon the gauge itself I think you do want the roller jewel slightly smaller because it does have to fit in the slot and it does have a little bit a play. But if it's too small you will lose energy so does have to be sized right. Oh other things to check is? I'm attaching an Elgin sheet on checking the escapement I've seen references in the past to making sure that the slot in the four corn is nice and smooth and apparently you can end up with a rough slot and then the recommendation is to polisher clean that up. Not sure how well that's really going to work even if it has been the recommendation of other reference materials. yes art full plate watches fun when they don't work. This is where it's nice to have another set of eyes sometimes as maybe they'll find something you didn't  although that can add other issues. The owner of the shop provides himself on his skills of so now two of my watches have relocated to his bench to solve problems both real and imaginary I'm sure that will get fixed eventually hopefully. But still sometimes another set of eyes might see something that you're not. yes this sort of thing can be quite frustrating. Also makes for an interesting problem unless of course you're the one trying to solve the problem that it's a Escapement Elgin setting up the escapement.PDF
    • I’m not to sure mate! I’ve sent a picture! The crown is off a Tissot 1853 automatic limited edition T115427 A GP19 moto go watch!   
    • For years and I'm still using it I've been using something called SeaMonkey? It's a Mozilla product Basically outscore its Firefox plus an integrated email program. But not the same problems here a lot of times when things are upgraded they tend to be now aimed at very specific browsers like Firefox so I've had to switch to Firefox to respond to any of the messages on the group. So yes they do seem to be getting more browser specific and that may be a reason for others having complications especially if whatever you using hasn't been updated. So yes the world is getting more browser specific perhaps for security reasons. Even though I use a product that is updated on a regular basis is still has problems. So whatever you using for browser should be up to date and if is not recognized it's going to be a problem.
    • I did remember to ask at work and minor complication? Well I suppose technically two separate complications. First off glass mineral glass versus Seiko's Hardlex Glass. Don't know if other companies have their own class or not and a basic class for crystals is probably not the same as window glass it would be more transparent. It becomes obvious if you're looking at a sheet of flat crystal glass versus window glass it's definitely more transparent you can see it when you look at the edges of it window glass looks green. No idea how that changes physical characteristics other than optical. Then we also have thickness like the Seiko five's there crystals are really sick compared to other things and I'm guessing that makes things different. In the first link it talks about Sapphire versus mineral glass. One other thing is bothering me though when I'm reading this is where is the source material? What I mean by this is could we end up with multiple generations of salespeople quoting the same sales tactic or information and we don't actually know because you don't have a source reference? Let me quote something off the website it's brittle oh dear I was sad? Except it's not immune to damage it can crack where shatter under extreme force or impact. So what is the definition of extreme force or impact? Then is that more or less extreme then mineral glass?  Then regarding the price difference while back I had asked the owner where the Sapphire came from and basically wherever he can get the cheapest. So typically ordered from a variety of online supply watch parts in the US and  aliexpress China.. Then yes it does make a difference because we go through a lot of glass crystals and sapphire https://thehorologylab.com/sapphire-crystal-vs-mineral-glass-which-is-best-for-your-watch#google_vignette Then I guess one is glass not glass when it goes by another name? Hardlex Looks like it's purely a Seiko product but now I wonder if other watch companies have their own special glass? I didn't remember from past experience my favorite was people exposed to welding you can find little blobs a metal stuck to the watch case the crystal still intact but there's little burnt holes were bits of metal had actually burnt into the crystal but it was still there. Okay website below starts off with Sapphire sounds good but Apparently it can shatter easier then Hardlex. https://theslenderwrist.com/hardlex-crystal/ One other thing is what I'm reading to websites would be back to I want to see the test results? Often times weren't looking for a subject will find websites where I basically called them these are better than that by the way but sometimes I'll find websites that I will call book review websites were basically the review other websites other material and don't really introduce anything new to the subject. As I said these websites look quite nice which is why I'm giving you a link but where's the test results the definition of extreme how extreme to break a sapphire versus a glass or Hardlex?  
    • What browser are you using Rich? Fine for me using Chrome 
×
×
  • Create New...