Jump to content

Omega 1010, low amplitude


mikepilk

Recommended Posts

I've just finished cleaning an Omega 1010 and I'm only gettting about 230° amplitude. 

This is the second 1010 in my collection, and with the first one, I only got about the same amplitude.

For lubrication I used :

9010 on the balance,escape wheel and fourth wheel,

9415 on the pallet jewels, 

D5 on the rest of the gear train (including the centre second pinion).

The spring looks good. All the jewels and pivots looked OK under a x10 Loupe.

Is anyone familiar with this movement and know what I've done wrong or what I should be looking for ? 

I plan to have a  look at the jewels/pivots under the microscope - should have done it initially !

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well the most obvious culprit would would be a played out mainspring, otherwise it sounds like you're looking in the right places.  I'm not sure if you have already but you might want to let it run for a bit- I usually give it twenty-four hours after assembly to let the oil settle/distribute before looking for an accurate reading on amplitude.  Then I'd check the following:

  1. Cleaned and properly lubricated jewels & bushings
  2. Bent or lopsided pivots
  3. Worn bushings, broken or cracked jewel settings
  4. End shake on all wheels

With Incabloc protection you'll also want to make sure the top and bottom cap jewels on the balance haven't been swapped- they aren't always the same thickness.

Edited by RyMoeller
Spelling
Link to comment
Share on other sites

D5 is kinda thick, not to mention is natural oil with a shorter life, synthetic would be better. I would use 9010 on everything that moves from the mainspring. That made a difference for me. Anyway, even 230' is plenty for the mov.t to run strong and accurate. And you also have to look at the overall pattern.

Edited by jdm
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Over-oiling the pallets can reduce amplitude. I presume by spoiling the impulse.

If you have a timegrapher, how was the amplitude in vertical positions such as pendant down and pendant left?

You can live with lower amplitude as long as the escapment is well poised. If it isn't, then you'll get progressively worse positional variation as the watch winds down which could become problematic.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, mikepilk said:

Can too much oil (it's not sloshing around!) have so much effect?

Yes, a liberal application of oil will have an effect on amplitude.  As @clockboy stated though, in my book 230 would be acceptable- especially if I felt I may have gone a little heavy on the oil.

Edited by RyMoeller
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I can live with the 230 - the watch will only get the occasional outing.

I was more interested as to why.

I've spotted one problem. The auto mechanism isn't jewelled and one of the pivot holes is oval. I can see the pivot waggling round if I manually wind it. 

Are the brass bearings machined in, or pressed in replaceable parts ?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Bearings on trainwheel bridges are often a culprit for low amp? At least on Seiko. Think the Omega 1010 is about the same construction with the bushing directly in the brass . Check for excessive movement in the barrel?   

Edited by rogart63
Link to comment
Share on other sites



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Good question!! Anyone know of a substitute movement??!! 🤔🙏
    • Interesting issue that I just noticed: this Seiko 5actus Watch from 1977 has a calibre listing on the dial of 7019-8030R but on the case back it says 7019-8010!! Like a mis-printed coin, is this watch therefore worth a lot of money for its rarity?? 🤪😲🤔🤪
    • I wish that was the case. The Aegler movements used in the early days by Wilsdorf & Davis (for brands like Rolex and Rolco) came in several sizes and without designated calibre numbers that survive.  They become a bit easier to identify during the 1920s. Below is an Aegler-Rebberg, 25.74mm in diameter. It’s from a woman’s Rolex wristwatch. Stamped Rebberg and 500 on the dial plate (but it isn’t a Rebberg 500, it’s the wrong size).  I’d be interested if anyone can identify the movement.  It is based off the Aegler Nr.1, circa 1903, but they based many many calibres of different sizes on it. The closest I have to a positive ID is the  ‘Rolex Nr.50’ circa 1917, but no dial side images or movement sizes are available in the references. There are identical looking movements in many sizes.  The 25.74mm of this movement is a particularly strange size for the era, it equates to 11.41 lignes.      Best Regards, Mark
    • It looks like this movement comes with a number of different shock settings. Emmywatch shows that it comes in versions with no shock settings, 'Incabloc', 'shock resist', and 'Supershock'. Perhaps the different settings position the impulse jewel/roller table in a non-ideal position relative to the pallet fork/guard pin. Are you able to check under high magnification if the pallet fork and roller table are able to operate without any interference? Just for fun I took a look and I have one FHF 70 in my collection, a West End Secundus with a non-shock protected FHF70. I had a note with the watch that said, "Movement is stamped 'FHF 70', but the FHF70 looks to have sub-seconds instead of center seconds movement (??)" but that a google search turned up both types for this movement. EDIT: I just took a look in my parts drawer and I have a few of these movements, both in center seconds and sweep seconds, but they all are non-shock protected.  
    • Any info on this watch would help. I know that it's sterling from London but I could not match the o letter date or make out makers mark.  Is the movement maker Camberwell or Lamberwell?   If I give it a twist it will run for about ten seconds.  $45 yard sale find.  I don't think that I want to service a fusee.  What quality is it?
×
×
  • Create New...