Jump to content

Rolex Timing Mechanism


Recommended Posts

Hi. Mark, I see you are up and looking over forum. First, really like appreciate quality and effort put into tutorials. In particular just watched three part series on rolex 3135 disassy, cleaning, reassy. My query/concern is for this fine design watch, surprised it appears, based on your tutorial, and my experience on similar women's rolex presidential datejust, there is no separate adjustment between beat and timing. From what I see, only available adjustment is to loosen plate holding balance down, move regulator which contains hairspring stud, then retighten. This can only modify beat, not timing, unless timing itself is adjusted by moving gold ring where upper balance jewel hold down spring is. The arm that moves holds the spring stud, so I fail to see how to adjust timing versus beat on this watch. Have searched internet and your tutorials exhaustively, do not see anything specific to regulating mechanisms on this type rolex. Any help or pointers to information with pictures of mechanisms involved would be greatly appreciated. I included a picture of balance regulator view.Thanks. Bill

IMG_0066.JPG

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi all and thanks. Peter thanks for detailed information and pix. That explains why I didn't see more standard two arm adjustment on balance regulator, for beat and timing. Since Microstella seems to use self locking screws was probably designed this manner to ensure long term more accurate regulation versus using hook loop to impede hairspring length. Makes sense, just didn't expect it. But more I look at Rolex, least modern generation calibers, less common to rest of industry designs tools and parts have become. With good design and reliability reasons though. Thanks again everyone.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

Alex, welcome to the forum.

I had to edit your post since it was a redirection/link to a sales page. Sales and promotions are forbidden in our forum. We do want you to feel at home here so any questions about horology or sharing your experiences on the subject are highly encouraged and appreciated.

Cheers,

Bob

Link to comment
Share on other sites



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I have read some suggestions that it can cause wear , particularly on the fork horns of a fully treated pallet fork. I've had half a kilo of steriac acid powder on a shelf for almost a year now, might have a little play today with a heater and a jar.  I think its because it gets into their cleaning solutions Mike. Theirs or anyone else's that services the watch next time, or if they need to strip back and rebuild. Could preclean but thats all time for a pro.
    • As I'm only cleaning watches in small numbers at home, I pre-clean any significant deposits of old grease and oil before using the cleaning solutions. I scrape off deposits with pegwood and Rodico, and if really dirty, wash parts in naphtha with a brush.  So I'm happy using DX, but can understand why it's avoided by the pros.
    • I think attaching a nut to the lid to pull it off is the least destructive, any damage damage on the outside is going to an easier fix than any created when trying to push it out from the inside. Scratching up the inside of the lid , mainspring or arbor bearing will be risk. Just my opinion.
    • yes the things we read in the universe I did see some where it was either difficult to clean off or it contaminated the cleaning fluid there was some issue with cleaning. I was trying to remember something about grease where as opposed to a substance of a specific consistency they were suggesting it had a base oil with something to thicken it. That conceivably could indicate that the two could separate and that would be an issue. But there is something else going on here that I had remembered so I have a link below and the description of the 9501 notice the word that I highlighted? Notice that word appears quite a bit on this particular page like 9415 has that property all so they 8200 mainspring grease and that definitely has to be mixed up when you go to use it because it definitely separates. just in case you didn't remember that nifty word there is a Wikipedia entry. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thixotropy   https://www.moebius-lubricants.ch/en/products/greases I wonder if what you're seeing is the boron nitride left behind after cleaning. In other words it's the high-pressure part of the grease and it's probably embedding itself into the metal which is why it doesn't clean off and shouldn't be a problem?
    • Yes and no. I use Moebius 9501 synthetic grease and it is significantly runnier than the Moebius 9504 synthetic grease (and I assume Molykote DX) that I previously used. I haven't seen 9504 spread and it is in my opinion the best grease money can buy. However, my current method of cleaning doesn't remove it from the parts, so that's why I have decided to use the 9501 instead. I believe I read somewhere that Molykote DX too is difficult to clean off. Thinking about it, I'm pretty sure my 9501 grease which expired in June 2022 is runnier now than it was when it was new, but whether new or old it always needs to be stirred before use. So, that's why I treat the parts of the keyless works, cannon pinion, etc. with epilame. That was very thoughtful of you and something that had completely passed me by. Not sure what the epilame will do when it wears off in a non-oiled hole. Anyone?
×
×
  • Create New...