Jump to content

Custom Watch Timing Stand


jdrichard

Recommended Posts

instead of a pin for the level, you could make the top part of the stand bigger around the axis point.  Drill small countersinks on the "in" side at the 12,3,6,9 positions and have a spring-loaded pin in the aluminum to interface with the countersink/detents.  This would provide a positive engagement at the 4 main positions without requiring any fiddling with pins to move into or out of the horizontal position.

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

instead of a pin for the level, you could make the top part of the stand bigger around the axis point.  Drill small countersinks on the "in" side at the 12,3,6,9 positions and have a spring-loaded pin in the aluminum to interface with the countersink/detents.  This would provide a positive engagement at the 4 main positions without requiring any fiddling with pins to move into or out of the horizontal position.

 

I think my only option at the moment is "rubber bands" to hold the movement in place. The other idea would be to devise a clamp that would blanket over the movement?

From Canada

From Canada

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, jdrichard said:

I need you to sketch this out. I'm an engineer and need pictures, words just confuse me.

From Canada

something like this:

the "detent ring" would be on the stand and the lower part he doesn't adjust would be the AL holder.

A clamp only needs one moving part.and a fixed base - if you use the same shape the regular ones use, i.e. little "C" shapes that cup the sides.  You could use pins and get away with w fixed and one moving.  the movement could be adapted from the various movement holders.  Put the two fixed pins at 10 & 2 and have the moveable one at 6.  One immediate complication that springs to mind is making it band-compatible.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

something like this:

the "detent ring" would be on the stand and the lower part he doesn't adjust would be the AL holder.

A clamp only needs one moving part.and a fixed base - if you use the same shape the regular ones use, i.e. little "C" shapes that cup the sides.  You could use pins and get away with w fixed and one moving.  the movement could be adapted from the various movement holders.  Put the two fixed pins at 10 & 2 and have the moveable one at 6.  One immediate complication that springs to mind is making it band-compatible.

Thanks. I will investigate tonight and get back.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i suck at drawing.  your stand device has two parts: the stand part and the movement/watch holder part.

on the movement holder, source a spring that fits in the hole you've already drilled in it and a ball bearing that's a tight fit.  jam the ball bearing over the spring and stake it into place.  the spring needs to be long/strong enough to push the ball bearing out at rest.  As you rotate the movement holder about its axis, the ball bearing now describes a circle on the stand. 

you now need something that is a dupe of the click ring in the video, the little brass disc he's holding.  you would have 4 divots if you want 90* turns; 8 if you want 45* like in the video.  You need the divots at the specific radius described by the ball bearing.

you could machine a separate disk and pin it (like a dial) into the stand piece.  or epoxy it.  or create a new stand altogether with the divots integrated.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Yes and no. I use Moebius 9501 synthetic grease and it is significantly runnier than the Moebius 9504 synthetic grease (and I assume Molykote DX) that I previously used. I haven't seen 9504 spread and it is in my opinion the best grease money can buy. However, my current method of cleaning doesn't remove it from the parts, so that's why I have decided to use the 9501 instead. I believe I read somewhere that Molykote DX too is difficult to clean off. Thinking about it, I'm pretty sure my 9501 grease which expired in June 2022 is runnier now than it was when it was new, but whether new or old it always needs to be stirred before use. So, that's why I treat the parts of the keyless works, cannon pinion, etc. with epilame. That was very thoughtful of you and something that had completely passed me by. Not sure what the epilame will do when it wears off in a non-oiled hole. Anyone?
    • Hi not found one either yet,  close relative is the 436 and 4361 according to ranff.db.   It gives quire a lot of detail but not as good as the old site.      RANFF.DB.
    • No problem to replace the setting with the staking set. Press the new setting from inside, use flat face punch with hole. The punch must be wider than the setting, the hole to be as not to press at the stone, but only on the bush. Press by hand until the setting gets flush with the plate surface, so the punch must rest on it.
    • Yes, the arbor usually makes about 3 to 3.5 turns. But usually spring takes 2/3 to 3/4 of the free space in barrel, not 1/2, so take it for the calcullations. This way the change in torque is smaller. I have a picture for You, this one is little older, but no mater
    • I overhauled a ladies Rolex and noticed erratic performance so I stripped in down again and did fault finding. This is what I saw. The lower jewel (the one in the plate) is cracked and the hole is too big. Before discovering this, I stripped down and re-cleaned the main-plate (and parts) by hand with a fine natural fiber brush. I somehow missed the fault the first time and cannot understand how it was still running. Perhaps re-cleaning it dislodged some pieces of the jewel widening the hole? I don't know. Now I need to replace the jewel but don't have a Seitz tool. The Rolex part is 2130-0913 and the top and bottom are the same. The part comes complete in brass setting with KIF elastor spring and cap jewel. Note: I have never replaced a jewel. I do have a good vintage stacking set that I've used quite a bit.  Can I replace using a stacking set? Any suggestions would be greatly appreciated.  
×
×
  • Create New...