Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I finally got one after many years and iam very happy I did a restoration on this vintage Rolex its stainless steel with 18k gold and diamonds it is all oem Rolex except the 18k and diamond bezel

d165e10d6ba2f1ed70fb3979b6e88c53.jpg

6291309326d8ec8990cbb2a0b193a3ec.jpg

d67f4d49da7ec61972d9904d599df05f.jpg

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G925A using Tapatalk

  • Like 1
Posted

What do you think is wrong. I think the writing on the dial is poor, it would be a lot finer and raised. Could depend on how the calendar changes,if its original it would change at 12 in a few seconds, fake will take minutes.

Posted

It could be a restored dial (3rd party, crown looks like is riding too high too, markers out of proportion maybe) and an aftermarket band/buckle...In any case, it doesn't really look the part, like something is not quite Rolex...but I've seen old name brands that originally were kind of less refined than today's versions. Maybe this is a compounded case of aftermarket/refurbish/refinish and old stuff together...Not a happy combination. But IF it is a Rolex it is a Rolex. I personally don't like the combination of this one but it is just my taste, maybe with a better, more defined/detailed picture...It would be great if we could see what is inside.

 

Cheers,

 

Bob

Posted

Wow you guys are rediculous it is all original Rolex except the bezel even the dial is oem rolex don't know how you can come up with that conclusion from a picture and no its not refinished either

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G925A using Tapatalk

Posted

pgse14, just take the back off and post a picture of the movement.

 

That should give these guys something to go on. At the moment they are just looking at the watch  face and giving honest opinions as to what they see that they think looks wrong.

 

Surely you want to know for sure ? I know I do.

 

Cheers, Mike

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)

Maybe it's a "Frankenwatch" which has been restored with other bits and pieces but it still has a genuine Rolex movement.  A picture of the movement would be helpful but pgse14, no one is forcing you to do anything...they're all curious and I must admit that I am too, because the general features of the watch dial and case look a little rough around the edges for a Rolex...but, hey, we could all be wrong.  Wouldn't you like to have the movement verified?

 

I think you might want to re-read Alaskamick's first comment in this thread...very reasonable advice, IMHO.  :)

Edited by stroppy
  • Like 3
Posted

It is real and clockboy all of you on here I dont have to prove its authenticity to any of you so yall have a nice day

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G925A using Tapatalk

Posted (edited)

It is real and clockboy all of you on here I dont have to prove its authenticity to any of you so yall have a nice day

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G925A using Tapatalk

 

No one said you have to do anything but if you post a picture of a watch and one of the many professionals on the site here spot something incongruous then of course, out of courtesy, they are going to give you a heads-up as to what they think.

 

Look at it this way...if you you went to the doctor with a lump on your skin and he tells you it's possibly something nasty then you don't ignore him and just go on believing it's a rogue pimple...you investigate.  

 

You put the picture up and trained eyes have spotted some things which don't seem right.  They aren't ridiculing you...they're trying to help you.

Edited by stroppy
  • Like 3
Posted

Yea I understand and I appreciate it and thanks for the critiques

Please post a picture of the movement. This way you will be able to back your statements and give other a chance to learn and apologize. You should not really have a problem doing that with an authentic watch.

  • Like 1
Posted

36696b702f22ec93707f279ebf9ff86e.jpg

490546cade0a96835150d79a9380b58f.jpg

af09e6b87fc3a95b90bc84e523cb2803.jpg

87f807de285e67428454b22ae0559e10.jpg

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G925A using Tapatalk

Apologies. It,s a real strange one for sure. It intrigues me why the original bezel has been changed & a leather strap has been fitted. However the movement looks genuine just a pity about the bezel. Once again apologies no offence intended.

  • Like 2
Posted

Its unique and thanks for the apologies

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G925A using Tapatalk

No problem, you have another from me. One lives and learns. :)

Posted (edited)

Honestly, I'm sure everyone had good intentions but the way some of those comments read, they sounded rather harsh, and rather final. 

Woops. 

Edited by Ishima

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Hello all, just disassembling to service, but I can’t figure out the working of the calendar work…it’s not operational the jumper and spring are ok, but the operation of the driving wheel has me at a loss. I can’t see a cam to drive anything. Is something damaged or missing? Help please!
    • Believe the relume (not a fan) was done a long time after the damage. 
    • I can only think of some chemical reaction to reluming
    • I have a little milling attachment for my WW lathe, but very rarely use it and not for wheel and pinion cutting. For that I use a small Sixis 101 milling machine. I normally do direct dividing, but sometimes have to do an odd count and use the universal index which also fits on the Sixis.   Back in the day when I didn't have a mill, I would cut gearing on my Schaublin 102. It has a universal dividing attachment which fits the back of the spindle. Both it and the one for the Sixis are 60:1 ratio, and with the set of 4  index plates I can do almost any division. When I've had to do a strange high count prime number, I print a disc with the needed division and just place the plunger on the dot. Any position error is reduced by a factor of 60 so still plenty accurate.   The machines are a mess in the pics as I'm in the process of making a batch of barrels for a wristwatch 🙃.   This is the Sixis. The head can also be placed vertically, as can the dividing spindle.   Dividing plates. The smaller ones fit another dividing spindle.   Universal divider for the Sixis. I put it together with parts from an odd Sixis spindle that takes w20 collets, like the Schaublin 102, and a dividing attachment from a Schaublin mill.     The dividing attachment for the 102. The gear fits in place of the handwheel at the back of the headstock.   And the little milling attachment for the WW lathe. I just set it on the slide rest to illustrate the size, you can see from the dust on it it really doesn't get used much. I think only when I change bearing in the head, to kiss the collet head seat (grinding wheel still in the milling attachment).
    • I read a lot about the quality (or lack thereof) of Seiko's 4R, 6R, 8L  movements...or more specifically the lack of regulation from the factory. Especially when compared to similar priced manufactures using SW200's or ETA's. I thought I'd ask those more in the know, do the 4R's and 6R's deserve their bad reputation, is it fairly easy for someone with minimal skills (or better yet a trained watch mechanic) to dial in these movements to a more acceptable performance.    For background I spent more on a 1861 Speedy years ago, expecting that the advertised 0-15s/d  would probably perform more like 5-7s/d. In reality it's been closed to 2-4s/d. 
×
×
  • Create New...