Jump to content

Copy Stand For Macro Photography


WillFly

Recommended Posts

Having equipped myself with a couple of Canon 70D bodies and lenses, I tested out using my old Pentax Super Takumar 52mm lens with x1, x2 & 3x converter rings for macro photography of watch faces and movements. The lens, plus x2 converter, seems very good indeed, but the problem has been finding the right height for accurate focussing as the tolerance is quite tight.

 

Anyway, I spotted a £44 copy stand on eBay the other day and bought it (brand new) from a computer/electronics firm in Kent. It came this morning and, for the price, is very good, robust and well made. Picture enclosed. Watch pics to follow!

 

post-64-0-48063200-1449662320_thumb.jpg

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

That is what i should need. I am a bad photographer. Have a nice watch but can't really use all the function. That is why i don't take any pictures when i service something. But with that i can have the camera focused on the object and maybe even a nice lamp on the stand.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just a quick post on some preliminary results. Picture 1 is of the face of my Elgin "Father Time" RR pocket watch - 52mm Super Takumar lens with a x2 converter ring. This was done hastily and the focus isn't quite sharp - my fault, not the lens!

 

Picture 2 is part of the movement - Super Takumar 52mm lens with x3 converter. Shot in raw and processed with LightRoom.

 

post-64-0-37037700-1449668767_thumb.jpg

post-64-0-12465600-1449668784_thumb.jpg

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks Bob - always good to get feedback. One of the problems of focus with a manual lens is that the viewfinder view isn't always possible. So I'm using the "screen view" - i.e. the touch sensitive screen on the Canon which folds round to act as a monitor. And because the lens is manual, the autofocus doesn't function, meaning that the focus ring has to be adjusted quite delicately and accurately.

 

I also forgot to turn off image stabilisation - which is always turned off when using a tripod or stand! I set the shutter drive to a 2 seconds timer to lessen any camera shake when taking the pic.

 

The camera mode is set to "Aperture Priority", which means that the lens speed is automatically adjusted. I set the ISO to 200 as I wanted as little "noise" (grain") as possible within the light tolerance (I used f11 to give some depth of field). No artificial light here - just daylight from a window by the table. I might invest in a good LED source or two.

 

And down the path of yet more kit we inevitably dribble...

:D

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

WOW! that second picture is pin sharp. beautiful.

that mount is a very good idea. my watch photography is something to be desired. i got the basics and haven't seemed to move past it.

one thing i can recommend, will, is to use manual focus rather than auto in such a tight spot. perhaps you are already doing that. i use an old manual canon lens (50mm 1.4) from the FD days and mounted it on an adapter to fit my newer EF canon camera. i got adapter rings for the old lens and have mounted magnifying lenses to it.

it's all manual adjustments because the depth of field it so shallow.

with a setup like you have i would stop it all the way to F22 and set my shutter speed to about 8 seconds in a darkened room. i've found that my focus is a lot better doing it that way.

wow, what i could do with that setup. hey - it only takes money.

 

apologies - i see you're using a manual lens already. i must have done some speed reading on your post.

Edited by ramrod
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Having equipped myself with a couple of Canon 70D bodies and lenses, I tested out using my old Pentax Super Takumar 52mm lens with x1, x2 & 3x converter rings for macro photography of watch faces and movements. The lens, plus x2 converter, seems very good indeed, but the problem has been finding the right height for accurate focussing as the tolerance is quite tight.

 

Anyway, I spotted a £44 copy stand on eBay the other day and bought it (brand new) from a computer/electronics firm in Kent. It came this morning and, for the price, is very good, robust and well made. Picture enclosed. Watch pics to follow!

 

attachicon.gifCopy stand.jpg

Looks good Will, in your option would it support a SLR (Nikon D7000) or would it be too much. I have been looking at ways to improve the pics for the forum & using a tripod is not good it just gets in the way.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Looks good Will, in your option would it support a SLR (Nikon D7000) or would it be too much. I have been looking at ways to improve the pics for the forum & using a tripod is not good it just gets in the way.

I can't see any problem in using a Nikon - the mount is a simple screw and knurled wheel, and I assume the Nikon has the usual screw-threaded hole in the base. If not, you might need some kind of adapter.

 

How far you have to move up or down, use manual or auto focus, etc., will depend on the lens you use.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I can't see any problem in using a Nikon - the mount is a simple screw and knurled wheel, and I assume the Nikon has the usual screw-threaded hole in the base. If not, you might need some kind of adapter.

 

How far you have to move up or down, use manual or auto focus, etc., will depend on the lens you use.

Thanks Will I will have a look as I can tether the Nikon to my MacBook Pro so this will make life easier.

PS what was the shops name.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I bought the smaller version of this (CS305) some time ago mainly for document copying and portability and it really is excellent, but I think I should probably have got this larger version to make it more adaptable. The CS305 is fine for compacts but is not really high or strong enough to support a camera with lens. Looks like I'll have to get another :D .

 

Stephen

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I think we've talked about this before, using a new mainspring to initially overcome the effects of more movement friction than there should be. The aim is to reduce all going friction not to push through the friction with more torque, that in the long run will create more wear.
    • Sensible precautions @rjenkinsgb. I remember as a lad, my mate's dad ran a garage. I can clearly remember watching him change break pads. He used an airline to blow the dust out, (when pads used asbestos), and  we used to practically bathe in "carbon tet". But then he did smoke about 40 cigs a day. Makes me shudder to think about it.
    • OK, a little bit more from today's lecture about the main springs. Generally, the spring in the barrel is limited and can't  unwind fully. With the blue line is shown the reserve/torque relation when spring unwinding is limited by the barrel. The green line represents the same when the spring is free to unwind fully And the red line shows the minimum torque that is needed for the movement to keep running. The yelow graph shows how the torque changes (from the blue) when the spring gets weaker (set) after 100 years of work. The purple line represents thinner and longer spring in the same barrel. As You can see, using thinner and longer spring will increase the power reserve. The 'set' spring will have the same reserve as a new one with the same sizes, only the amplitude will be just a little smaller.  Of course, this is true only when the movement othervice is in good health ( the red line is lo enough)
    • As long as you don't grind the stuff up and blow it around, you should be fine. Use a dust mask if in doubt.   The things I'm very careful of are: Radium lume - even the stuff that is visually completely dead and inert is still highly radioactive; it's the fluorescent part that decays, not the radium. A single speck inhaled or ingested can cause cancer, so store parts in zip bags and wear a dust mask & wipe your work area down after handling anything that uses it. A proper geiger counter is a good investment if you plan on working with vintage watches, so you can check for it & take appropriate precautions.   "One dip" & equivalents - the original type & the generic PERC dry cleaning fluid (Tetrachloroethylene / perchloroethylene) which is what the original one dip was mostly made of. That's toxic, a known carcinogen. Use in very good ventilation only & keep it sealed whenever possible.   The newer B-Dip is presumably a safer replacement.  
    • Only 137% !  sounds like you're not putting enough effort in 😆.  I would think of it like cogs on pushbike.  Fastest speed to the spindle would be largest pulley wheel on the drive and smallest pulley wheel on the driven. If the motor was into a sliding bed you would have 3x4 ? Speeds.
×
×
  • Create New...