Jump to content

Recommended Posts

13 minutes ago, CWRNH said:

What is the common?

It is my empirical and partly technical opinion working with sound. But above 40 dB it is very good. Between 45 and 50 is almost perfect. More than 50 would be the ideal.
The WOS screen is also not used as a reference, as it shows very little noise and the peaks are very high. Furthermore, WOS does not apply any gain. What I interpret that determines that the signal is very good.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, guidovelasquez said:

It is my empirical and partly technical opinion working with sound. But above 40 dB it is very good. Between 45 and 50 is almost perfect. More than 50 would be the ideal.
The WOS screen is also not used as a reference, as it shows very little noise and the peaks are very high. Furthermore, WOS does not apply any gain. What I interpret that determines that the signal is very good.

So far the best I have had is 55

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, guidovelasquez said:

It seems to me an excellent result. In my case I do not exceed 52 dB. But that is enough.

Here is WOS with a Val7750 movement, SNR is not as good, it is at 30.  Probably because the movement is so quiet and inside its heavy case.image.thumb.png.79c0e456d6edba2f3ae3ad859a439f65.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, guidovelasquez said:

I suggest you do a test with eTimer, disabling the filter. With this you can see what is the real value of the noise signal coming from the mic + pream.

Was your 52 results with or without filtering?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 hours ago, CWRNH said:

What Spectrum analyzer are you using?

I used audacity for those pictures.  But I have also added ability to generate spectrograms into tg-timer, https://github.com/xyzzy42/tg/tree/trentpi/python

Looking at sound again, it seem very clear that something is ringing inside the movement, but this happens only on every other beat.  Maybe pallet fork is vibrating after each beat, but only in one direction, due to some difference in the pallet jewels?  Or escape wheel vibrates depending on which pallet jewel is locking it?

image.thumb.png.fd6b82b9b31af3a8231df9cc4abae491.png

image.thumb.png.af99a751b2570efa0887e3b17c826e71.png

Edited by xyzzy
  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 hours ago, xyzzy said:

I used audacity for those pictures.  But I have also added ability to generate spectrograms into tg-timer, https://github.com/xyzzy42/tg/tree/trentpi/python

Looking at sound again, it seem very clear that something is ringing inside the movement, but this happens only on every other beat.  Maybe pallet fork is vibrating after each beat, but only in one direction, due to some difference in the pallet jewels?  Or escape wheel vibrates depending on which pallet jewel is locking it?

image.thumb.png.fd6b82b9b31af3a8231df9cc4abae491.png

image.thumb.png.af99a751b2570efa0887e3b17c826e71.png

I downloaded the source code...  No idea how to use it!  LOL  Any guidance would be greatly appreciated...

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, CWRNH said:

No idea how

Well, if you are interested in investing a few hours here goes:
Source code is like the electronic diagrams of an electronics project. You must run them. But you can modify it according to your goals. Thus, from the source code, you will produce your own version of the program or, if you do not modify anything in the source code, produce the program in someone else's version.
Necistaras as in my case.
1.- Atom to rewrite the source code.
2.- MSYS2 to "compile" the program.
The guidance on how to proceed is in this link

https://github.com/vacaboja/tg

and here I put a clipping of where you should look.

github.JPG.a097ec94ee98072d8822096961d781a5.JPG

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, guidovelasquez said:

Well, if you are interested in investing a few hours here goes:
Source code is like the electronic diagrams of an electronics project. You must run them. But you can modify it according to your goals. Thus, from the source code, you will produce your own version of the program or, if you do not modify anything in the source code, produce the program in someone else's version.
Necistaras as in my case.
1.- Atom to rewrite the source code.
2.- MSYS2 to "compile" the program.
The guidance on how to proceed is in this link

https://github.com/vacaboja/tg

and here I put a clipping of where you should look.

github.JPG.a097ec94ee98072d8822096961d781a5.JPG

thank you

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 4/30/2021 at 3:15 AM, CWRNH said:

image.thumb.png.d695fc8a685a85144e10173fee5ea9b4.png

What amp design have you used to achieve this result?

Also, is this still using the clip-on piezo mic?

I've tried to look back at this huge thread, but not really got the full information.

Thanks!

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Bonzer said:

What amp design have you used to achieve this result?

Also, is this still using the clip-on piezo mic?

I've tried to look back at this huge thread, but not really got the full information.

have you look at the website for the software he has the official amp.

then just because a lot of us had our own designs sprinkled through the current 44 pages of discussion. Which probably does make for interesting and confusing reading

then there's the confusion factor for all of us? The picture above looks nice doesn't it but were missing details as you've asked about. Like a pocket watch will look nicer than a wristwatch. We really all need to buy the exact same watch for running tests so we all of the same thing and we can compare. or we need to convince the Chinese to clone the witschi test module so we all have the exact same thing so pictures like the one posted above would have meaning because we could all try the same thing and see that ours does the same thing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 5/1/2021 at 8:00 AM, CWRNH said:

I downloaded the source code...  No idea how to use it!  LOL  Any guidance would be greatly appreciated...

If you go to the page and scroll down, there are instructions for building for a number of different operating systems.  I have written more instructions for Linux and MacOS, but do not use Windows, so I can not improve those myself, which is one of the reasons they are probably the worst.  Also because Windows makes these things harder.

I can and do provide installable packages for Linux, where to get those is also described if one scrolls down, but do not know how to do this for Windows or have a Windows computer to do it on.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, JohnR725 said:

We really all need to buy the exact same watch for running tests so we all of the same thing and we can compare.

We do not necessarily have to have the same clock, the same amplifier or sensor or microphone.
Reasonable results can be obtained in a number of ways. Also keep in mind that programs or software can handle very poor sounds. Of course the ideal is a good sign.
Here I leave the results and the photos as I obtain them.

1960383186_WhatsAppImage2021-05-04at13_10_37.thumb.jpeg.9a5d22666570488bbd0a121cd2d1108c.jpeg

546313470_WhatsAppImage2021-05-04at13_10.37(1).thumb.jpeg.c2328a1d3dff966492084f26f87fb5ac.jpeg

1292676605_APOLOGA.PNG.1a5fb29796d307f9902ef88585b5f163.PNG

rec0504-131406.wav

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 hours ago, guidovelasquez said:

We do not necessarily have to have the same clock, the same amplifier or sensor or microphone.
Reasonable results can be obtained in a number of ways. Also keep in mind that programs or software can handle very poor sounds. Of course the ideal is a good sign.
Here I leave the results and the photos as I obtain them.

personally I still like the witschi test device but it probably cost an arm and a leg and six fingers and your firstborn.

so I'm intrigued and enthusiastic about your idea but were still stuck with what I'm trying to get at is we need a reference device. It should simulate a pocket watch and a little tiny ladies watch with set parameters of all of us in the entire group put it on our what ever we all would get the exact same results which is hard to do if everyone has everything different.

The problem I've seen when answering questions on the discussion group at least watch repair questions is my watch is doing this well is it really? Are we basing answers on faulty diagnostics. This actually happened in a rather lengthy discussion with a little tiny ladies watch where we just weren't sure where we stood with us faulty diagnostics or faulty watch. We needed a tiny reference to verify that the timing whatever was working.

Or here when people put their circuits together how do they know it's actually working out of they know it's sensitive enough.

I was just thinking of you all have the same watch at least we would all have the same results but you indicate that's not necessary so I'm looking forward to your ideas of solving this problem.

then probably too many variables but I wonder if we could take your wave file for instance play it on a computer perhaps a small speaker because it has a moving coil I wonder if that could simulate a watch? But were still stuck with a standard if your computer is outputting the volume at twice the level of mine were measurement results may look different.

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, JohnR725 said:

We needed a tiny reference to verify that the timing whatever was working.

Well, you're right. We would need a very reliable standard to do our tests.
Here I have a proposal. It is not created by me. It comes with Graham Baxter's eTimer software. It is a waveform in wav format.  Is 2min and 40 seg, the sound of a 18000 BPH or 5BPS clock. Executed properly and with any of our timing machine programs, it should give the following results. -1 second of disface per day. 0.0 beat error and 262 degrees of amplitude when the lift angle is set at 52 degrees. Not much but it has helped me to learn.

1574735323_3Programas.thumb.JPG.f16bcd677d77afdcd7d0a2a9936e2638.JPG

 

Edited by guidovelasquez
delete sound file.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, JohnR725 said:

we need a reference device

Frankly, the reference device is an atomic clock.  So most, if not all, of this thread is OCD.  Interesting...fun...and useful in a vacuum, but at the end of the day, a mechanical movement pales in comparison to digital electronics. So...why bother? 

Fine, I am OK with doing your best, but polishing a turd has no real benefit.  Accept that mechanical watches are not accurate and move on.  Value the beauty of their architecture and reset them once per week.  Rent or download the movie "Castaway" and face reality!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Similar Content

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Hope you mum keeps on mending. I was adamant that I was going to get myself going after my stroke. I was only 52. I still have a lot of life left to live. Some people give up. Some people don't let it beat them. Your mum sounds like one of the winners. 👍
    • Moved in. Now working out the best place to have things so moving around the room makes sense. The wooden movement testing rig may end up being suspended from the roof with some pulleys and ropes that I salvaged from some alfresco blinds that we replaced. I always seem to salvage things from things we scrap thinking, "I have an idea what I can use these for." I hope I'm not the only one that does that. My wife hates me for it. "What are you going to do with all this crap?" Anyway, here you go. If anyone has suggestions for workflow around a room, speak up. All Ideas are appreciated. The bench on wheels will carry either a laptop or my Samsung table for using with the little camera that is on the tripod for photos while dismantling etc. The small bar fridge in the corners going to have water etc in it and I might move the coffee maker from the kitchen out there as I am the only one that uses it. I want to get an ultrasonic cleaner so I may set up some sort of cleaning rig in front of the glass of the sliding door. Where the grandmother clock is currently standing. I'm hoping that I will be able to transition my working area, which is the table that the stool is sitting in front of, fairly easily between clocks and watches. I'll be doing my best to make sure that tools for each are separatedwhen stored. Logistics. I'll have a bit of wall space for being able to hang clocks if I find some that I wish to keep or hopefully at some time to be able to hang customer clocks for monitoring after servicing/repairs. The clock on the left in the blue pillow slip and the grandmother clock are earmarked for  Jarryd and his wife, Sara. He helped me move the benches in today. And then went on to tell me that ticking clocks drive him nuts. Who doesn't like the rhythmic ticking of a clock? I have a green pad for adding to the bench for a working surface. It is not a cutting mat or one of the Bergeon mats. It is actually a green desk writing mat. Was really cheap and will do exactly what I want, I think. I also have to get the sparkies back that put our new stove in to put some power points on the walls behind the benches. Hopefully this is all going to go well. I'm excited about it. It'll beat having to live out in the garage doing it. The other thing I have to do is cut a circle or square of plastic to go over the bouncing watch or clock part black hole in the middle of the floor. I would pretty much guarantee that anything that sproings off the bench would end up going straight down that drain. 😄      I think I have been on this forum about 4 years and still yet to really strike a blow. That's a bit sad isn't it. Signed up to Mark's watch course and have yet to buy the movement for working on. Have most of the tools I think I will need so now all just a matter of will.  
    • So leave off the seconds. Stand the movement on its edge, its the dial edge that rests on the pad ( either rubber or cork , something that wont slip ). Use a finger of your left hand to hold the movement upright,  right hand presses the release and flicks out the stem. I do it this way so i can see what I'm under a microscope. But you could hold the movement between two fingers of your left hand, its the right that has to manipulate the stem out by pushing the release and flicking out the stem with  right ring finger nail. Sounds more complicated than it actually is. I guess you could fix a push pin to something solid, then all you need to do is push the release against the pin, leaving your right hand completely free to pull the stem out.
    • Try putting everything back together and closing the back cover. I think one of the two springs has to contact the metal casing to ground the casing. So when you press the button, it will touch the contact on circuit board and close the circuit.
    • Yes, the seconds hand is the longest and goes almost to the edge of the dial. I can’t quite picture it how you do it on the rubber pad
×
×
  • Create New...