Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Well, I have just experimentally used this graf-apsco. 

I put the main plate from a vostok parts movement in a movement holder and disassembled and removed the lower balance jewel setting. 

With the space available under the optics i could easily manipulate things with tweezers, but getting a screwdriver in was very awkward. 

Additionally, the area i can see is no bigger than about 16mm across with the lower magnification lenses. 

So, with the presumption that i probably can't easily change the optics to get more depth and width, I think this is best regarded as a beautiful example of space-age industrial design that is perhaps useful for hairspring manipulation and maybe careful cleaning? 

 

20220218_183030.jpg

Posted
22 minutes ago, spectre6000 said:

I posted a page or two back about the part number decoding, as well as a minor breakdown of the AmScope sale strategy/amount/timing.

@spectre6000That's what I was thanking you and everyone else for. I must of read your posts half a dozen times 🙂 Will be getting the 20x eyepieces for my kids as well, great idea.

27 minutes ago, TimpanogosSlim said:

So, with the presumption that i probably can't easily change the optics to get more depth and width, I think this is best regarded as a beautiful example of space-age industrial design that is perhaps useful for hairspring manipulation and maybe careful cleaning? 

Now that is an object of beauty. It's a shame it can't be used for what you wanted in the main but if that were mine it would be taking the place of some of the wife's figurines on the mantelpiece 🙂

C.

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)
3 hours ago, Skyfiller said:

@spectre6000That's what I was thanking you and everyone else for. I must of read your posts half a dozen times 🙂 Will be getting the 20x eyepieces for my kids as well, great idea.

Sorry about that/you're welcome. I started out answering the part about the 10% sale, but accidentally linked to the part number breakdown post, then saw the thing about the part number quagmire, and things devolved. We started potty training our 2 year old this weekend, and it's been a long day. 15% comes up from time to time, check out the Wayback Machine on obvious time periods, and you'll be able to figure when to wait for.

Re: 20x eyepieces, they came in handy this past week in a non-child way. I listen to a lot of vinyl, and we had a record that was skipping. I recalled reading a few years back that it might be possible to repair a skipping record. Tons of caveats; You have to know what you're doing, be super careful, guess right, etc. I figured I could probably eliminate a lot of the guesswork if I could see it. I saw what was likely my skipping scratch, and got up on it with the microscope, but nothing... I turned the album around on the offending track a while, and then I found the problem... A dust mote wasn't actually a dust mote, but some hard bit of ash or something that melted into a groove, and was really stuck in there! I grabbed my 0.5mm watchmaking screwdriver, dropped it in the groove like a needle, and popped that hard little thing out! No more skip! Excellent tool! 

Edited by spectre6000
  • Like 3
Posted
6 hours ago, spectre6000 said:

I posted a page or two back about the part number decoding, as well as a minor breakdown of the AmScope sale strategy/amount/timing.

Looks like 15% off is as far as they will mark down open box, too. So right now, in the president's day sale, you can get a new or open box SM-4TP for $486.19, and coupon codes don't apply to open box. 

Or there's this: 

https://www.amazon.com/Parco-Scientific-PA-5FZ-Trinocular-Magnification/dp/B078PSZJCB/

i don't think i am at a point where spending four or five bills on a microscope makes sense though. 

Posted

I have something similar, with an integrated lighting ring, but without the swan-necks. Mine cost about a quarter of that. I bought  stand-alone swan-necks and I add Illumination from below in some circumstances. Getting the lighting right is tricky. It's good for inspection and saving the pictures to the pc, but of limited use for working under.

Posted
11 hours ago, TimpanogosSlim said:

Exact same thing without the AmScope sticker (which peeled off on mine on its own the other day), and for a better price. That's most of what I ended up putting together at a pretty stellar price. Just add the light, 20X eyepieces, and Canon mount, and I think that's it for what I went with with my bonus bits. The only other thing necessary for watchmaking though, is the light. Looking through their Amazon store, that seems to be the cheapest option with the double boom stand, so I guess they don't have an even cheaper one without the 2x Barlow. That's likely the best deal I've seen yet on a proper watchmaking setup.

Actually, I just went to the link I posted previously, and it's dead. Searching organically, and they've bumped the price up $20. So... The current best value option for a watchmaking microscope setup is:

Scope+ ($450 shipped):

https://www.amazon.com/Parco-Scientific-PA-5FZ-Trinocular-Magnification/dp/B078PSZJCB/

and

Light ($22.99 shipped):

https://smile.amazon.com/gp/product/B07VR2LJJL/ref=ppx_od_dt_b_asin_title_s00

If you want to be able to take photos to be able to get help here, you have your choice of cameras or camera mounts, which vary wildly. Still, If $473 was all it took to get where I'm at without all the spreadsheets, and decoding, and research, and figuring out sales schedules, I'd have pulled the trigger much sooner.

Posted
4 hours ago, spectre6000 said:

Exact same thing without the AmScope sticker (which peeled off on mine on its own the other day), and for a better price.

 

It looks like there are some ebay vendors at around the $400 price point as well. 

Something to think about i guess. I grew up in a big family on an english professor's salary so some level of frugality and DIY ethic is baked into my psyche but it seems like the chances of this sort of scope coming up for sale used at a hefty discount are slim. 

Posted

A 0.5x Barlow lens will halve your magnification but double your working distance.

Most modern microscopes have screw threads on the lens shroud where accessory lenses can be attached. Yours has a lens shroud. Maybe you can remove it and 3D print something where you can fix a Barlow lens and maybe a ring light even.

Posted
1 hour ago, HectorLooi said:

A 0.5x Barlow lens will halve your magnification but double your working distance.

Most modern microscopes have screw threads on the lens shroud where accessory lenses can be attached. Yours has a lens shroud. Maybe you can remove it and 3D print something where you can fix a Barlow lens and maybe a ring light even.

That shroud covers a turret that has two pair of objectives and spins freely with two stops. One set has twice the magnification of the other. Either of them have more magnification than i need for most watchmaking tasks.

If i physically attach a ring light i will have to make sure there is enough wire slack so that i can switch back and forth between the two sets of objectives. I've ordered a cheap 12v LED ring (for automotive headlight "halo" effect) that i was thinking i would mount so that it rests around that turret. 

I don't remember the measurements of the small end of the shroud but in the neighborhood of 50mm sounds about right to me. 

silicone or hot glue to the shroud might be a pipe dream, it's not a big deal to 3d print something, even with threads to mount a lens -- I've already printed adapters to mount photographic filters to USB cameras.

I wear glasses and having a circular polarizing filter on the webcam to cut back on the glare makes video conferences slightly less awkward. Though i have to say - I have been working from home since september 2017 and i can count on one hand the number of times that anyone at my current employer, who predominantly employs people who work from home, has even suggested a video conference. 

One time, it was an all-hands meeting to introduce a newly hired C-level executive. The owner said he "wanted to see some faces out there". And 5 minutes later, disappointed with the number of faces he could see, said he would pay a $100 bonus to anyone who turned on their camera. But it was hot in my house and i wasn't wearing a shirt!

I already ordered the "wide field" 5x eyepieces from an aliexpress vendor in hopes they provide a somewhat wider field of view than the ones i got from amazon. Look exactly like what would cost $40+ship from amscope but with a total out of pocket at about $14. I also tinker on small electronics from time to time and the Graf-Apsco should be handy for minute board-level repairs as it is now. 

There's an ebay vendor that will sell me an 0.5x barlow with 42, 48, or 50mm mount for $19ish. If that doubles the working range, that's worth it. 

Posted (edited)

For some perspective by picture:

That's a 7x-45x Stereo Amscope with a 0.5x Barlow lens and 10x eyepieces. It shows a working height of 200mm and that Bergeon movement holder just fills the complete sight picture in the microscope on the lowest magnification. I tried taking pics through the eyepieces but my phone camera doesn't want to play along

IMG_8724.thumb.jpg.abc9c5c4a272cf9636af2ae9f6e569f9.jpg

I got it years ago for working on automotive engine control units as my day job (lots of really small parts on those; smaller than watch parts to be honest) and I use it pretty much all day every day. Soldering, hot air rework, that kinda thing. When I got into the watchmaking hobby I simply carried on using that microscope as I'm comfortable with it. I've tried watchmakers eyeglasses but it's no where near as convenient as working with the microscope (to me at least) so I don't bother with eyeglasses at all anymore. It's great because I can work on a standard height bench and I sit upright to look through the microscope, not hunched over as I would wearing eyeglasses.

Edited by gbyleveldt
  • Thanks 1
Posted
3 hours ago, gbyleveldt said:

It's great because I can work on a standard height bench and I sit upright to look through the microscope, not hunched over as I would wearing eyeglasses.

This is arguably almost as much a benefit as the improved visibility. Watchmaking benches are rare and expensive; much more expensive than a microscope. You can rig up a tall work surface to save your neck, but then your arms/shoulders are the next in line of contortion. I went the opposite direction initially, and bought a cheap wooden stool from IKEA, then chopped the legs off to make it short. Cheaper than raising or a raised work surface. Still had the arms/shoulder issue, but then add that I either needed to really be able to stretch out my legs, or my knees were on the list of contortion. With the 'scope, I'm at a perfectly serviceable work height all around. There are three things that keep me from watchmaking: one is the physical discomfort (solved), two is the eye strain/inability to really see what I'm doing (solved), and the third is just finding time (constant struggle).

  • Like 2
Posted
19 minutes ago, spectre6000 said:

Watchmaking benches are rare and expensive

Yes, pretty rare.  I picked one up recently for $300.  Vintage, very early 1900s.  But, your point is well taken!

My microscope sits on my electronic work bench.

Posted

Hi Joe   I have somthing similar for close inspection work, I does the job. not tried to work under it as its a bit close to thhands and looking at the screen and working  a bit disorientating.  Not got the required surgical technique.

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Posted

Hi Joe  I think its what you want it for . If its to work under for balance work etc Its not good enough you need a different scope like the one attached which is a binocular scope with a decent working distance.    Cheers

boom scope.jpg

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Posted
20 hours ago, TimpanogosSlim said:

That shroud covers a turret that has two pair of objectives and spins freely with two stops. One set has twice the magnification of the other. Either of them have more magnification than i need for most watchmaking tasks.

I was thinking about this statement and I think you don't have a true stereo microscope.

A true stereo microscope has two separate optical pathways, with two separate objective lenses side by side, to give stereoscopic vision. From your description, if it shares a single objective lens, it would be impossible to give stereoscopic vision.

  • Thanks 1
Posted

Hi Weasol,   Thanks for your response,

I need one with a monitor( neck problem ), not many types are available to buy here. will keep looking for one.

Regards

 

Posted
3 hours ago, HectorLooi said:

I was thinking about this statement and I think you don't have a true stereo microscope.

A true stereo microscope has two separate optical pathways, with two separate objective lenses side by side, to give stereoscopic vision. From your description, if it shares a single objective lens, it would be impossible to give stereoscopic vision.

Nope, it's a true stereo microscope. Like i keep saying, the turret has two pair of objectives. If you search google images for "graf apsco stereo-graf" there are many versions of it, but i haven't come across another with a turret like this one. 

I haven't taken a good picture of the objectives yet. Maybe tomorrow. Here's a fuzzy crop of one of my existing pictures. 

20220218_130013.jpg.76a9f660c9756307fd0d9c6110834d6b.jpg

I think i will order the 0.5x barlow and between now and when it gets here from china i have some time to acquaint myself with the threads library for OpenSCAD - replace the shroud with a lens adapter. 

 

Posted
14 hours ago, TimpanogosSlim said:

We have a new winner! 

Current Champ-een:

What I'm calling the ideal scope + a 2X Barlow for $399.28 (free shipping):

https://www.ebay.com/itm/383948619796

Light ($22.99 shipped):

https://smile.amazon.com/gp/product/B07VR2LJJL/ref=ppx_od_dt_b_asin_title_s00

Given this trend, I'm sure the light (and whatever other peripherals) can be found for less as well. The cost of proper watchmaking microscopy has been dramatically reduced through this crowd sourced sourcing here... When I started looking, I was having a hard time justifying a $600-700 purchase. I don't think I'd have paused nearly as long at $420.

Posted
13 hours ago, TimpanogosSlim said:

Nope, it's a true stereo microscope. Like i keep saying, the turret has two pair of objectives. If you search google images for "graf apsco stereo-graf" there are many versions of it, but i haven't come across another with a turret like this one. 

I haven't taken a good picture of the objectives yet. Maybe tomorrow. Here's a fuzzy crop of one of my existing pictures. 

20220218_130013.jpg.76a9f660c9756307fd0d9c6110834d6b.jpg

I think i will order the 0.5x barlow and between now and when it gets here from china i have some time to acquaint myself with the threads library for OpenSCAD - replace the shroud with a lens adapter. 

 

Here we go. 

20220222_115035.jpg

  • Like 1

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • This was what I was afraid of. The movement is not one of the generic black square modules. Remove the movement from the clock and try prying it open very carefully, without breaking the plastic tabs. The plastic might be brittle from age. Clean the wheels and check the battery contacts for corrosion. Check the PCB for bad solder joints. Take plenty of photos along the way.
    • One of the problems with trying to Photograph Phils things are that his enjoyment was building these things so they tended to E falls on what will see if I can find some earlier pictures or any pictures I wasn't even sure because I was looking for that specific picture for somebody else and even it got the last version and that would have been the last version. You will note that he put the indexing on something that he could unscrew it or whatever and it can slide back out of the way so the rest of the lathe can be used as a lathe. With the lathe cut are actually coming down from the top I was there once where he demonstrated how to cut a pivot with the setup it was really beautiful. Older set up if I remember it's not a worm gear assembly in the thing in between the stepping motor and the holding block I believe this particular one was like a 100 to 1 gear ratio. Earlier version with watchmaker's lathe. Even looks like he is the watchmakers bed and then switch to something he made. Then I do have other pictures and things of the rotary stage in use. In the raw so if you tube videos here is an example of one were somebody's mounting a three jaw chuck. At one time there were available on eBay they were not cheap but if you're patient like I was I found one cheap on eBay. After you watch the video it look at his other videos he is a whole bunch of other examples of the same rotary stage. That I do know there are other pictures examples and possibly videos you just have to track them down. One of the minor issues of finding this particular tech sheet for the unit is I believe it was a custom manufacturer and the company change their name but I remember the new name here's a link to the company https://www.ondrivesus.com/rino-mechanical-components                
    • Escapement adjusting always interesting and depending upon the reference always confusing. Okay maybe it's not always confusing but it does lead to confusion. I have a PDF below it's actually a whole bunch of separate stuff including a hand out that came from a lecture that's on you tube. Then from that we get this image Consequences of doing things especially if you do things out of order or you do things for the wrong reason. Oh and even if the watches working I made the mistake one so showing my boss how tweaking the banking pins on a full plate on the timing machine made the amplitude get better and now he thinks that's what they're for and I don't think a fully grasped exactly what horn clearance means. Consequence of doing things. Notice what it says about opening and closing the banking pins and total lock? So yes I've had that on a full plate where it won't unlock at all and that's the banking pins or a combination of things basically. So banking pins unfortunately get moved. One of the ways to tell if it's been moved is the look straight down at the end of the fork with the balance wheel removed. Power on the fork push at the one side look at it push it to the other side also look at it and compare anything with the center reference the balance jewel and see if both sides of the same. No guarantee after the same there in the right place but at least are the same typically when people play with things one side will be way off from the other because they had no idea what they were doing at all because of course it's a full plate and you really have to paying attention and even then there's still hard to do. Then the other thing that comes up like it shows below is people often adjust the banking pins to do all those other things as opposed to horn clearance which is all that it's therefore and maybe bonus Guard pin clearance although you're supposed to deal with the guard pin is a separate thing like single roller gets bent in Or out or sometimes physically gets moved in and out. Some full plates older escapement's typically pallet forks held together with screws and you can actually unscrew and move the entire assembly in Or out more complications to deal with.     Escapement handout wostep nscc.pdf
    • If he was much younger and some sort of sports player it wouldn't be a problem. They would be in there and doing surgery and he'd be back on the field in no time. Unfortunately when you get older little things are bad and big things can be really bad so not good at all.
    • Where I work everything incoming watches whatever detailed descriptions are taken entered into a computer program and photograph of each item. Then ideally although it depends on who's doing the paperwork detailed descriptions can be quite good other times there lacking. Like I really like it with pocket watches if they would record the serial number it avoids confusion later on. Then when watch repairs are completed that is also entered in. It's one of the amusements I learned when I was in school instructor had a shop and commented about the important aspect of keeping detailed records of repairs. Because oftentimes a customer who got a new crystal will come back later on when the watch doesn't work and expect you to fix the entire watch for free. Then you can remind them that they just got a crystal. Strangely enough that keeps coming up or occasionally comes up where I work now. One of the problems of using the service marks on the case is that in the case of pocket watches oftentimes that's not the original case. Then case marks? What I was doing warranty work for a company I used to describe a code number in the back of the case and it would tell me the next time I see the watch that basically what I did I made no attempt at keeping track of customers because we had literally thousands of them I think they sold 30,000 of these watches and they would come back by the hundreds because they had a lifetime warranty. Yes that's a story all of itself but I would put a code number that would reference what was done to the watch the last time and think I had a date in there somehow so it did tell a story if you knew the code. Another shop I once worked out the number would reference the page in the book. So other than knowing we had been in there you would have no idea what happened because you have to go look at the page in the book to see what happened. Then the problem of how you examine a watch you should examine the watch in detail every single time to avoid complications. Although on vintage watches and this is a of amusement I have at work when people ask something and I say of the watches done when it leaves. This is because on vintage oftentimes problems won't show up until the watches much farther into the repair like it's now running and you discover things that you can't discover before because it wasn't running to discover them that also become sometimes difficult to have exact rigid prices are estimates of repairs or in the case of a pocket watch you may not find out if a casing problem to later on when you case it up in the watches running. I was just thinking for all those people that would like to leave a mark maybe you should learn to do what some of the past watchmakers did? Leave a mark but leave it in such a way that no one will ever find it? Typically not done for repair purposes but done for other reasons like identifying it's legit. I have a friend with a Gruen watch and one of the Roman numbers the bottom line that just looks like a line under extreme magnification actually says Gruen watch company or something equivalent. So here's a link showing how to mark your watch without being seen although that's not the actual title. So if you can learn micro engraving you can engrave the watch someplace probably just about any place you just have to remember where you put it. https://cnaluxury.channelnewsasia.com/obsessions/how-to-prove-if-watches-are-authentic-secret-signatures-182516  
×
×
  • Create New...