Jump to content

Tissot 781: hour hand not in sync with the minute hand


Recommended Posts

Hello all, I have a Tissot cal. 781 with a strange problem. Let's say I will pull the crown and start rotating the hands at 12 o'clock, with both hands pointing exactly to the 12 index. After rotating the minute hand around the dial twelve times, the hour hand will now point to somewhere near "quarter-to-twelve" rather than to the 12 index. And if I go on, the "delay" accumulates.

The hour hand however seems to be moving very smoothly, there are no apparent stops, so I tend to believe it is not the matter of friction between the hour hand and the dial.

I disassembled the motion work and inspected the teeth and leaves, none of them is missing and they all look right. I took a picture of the gear, counted the teeth and leaves and the ratio is also correct - a 12 leaf cannon pinion to a 36 tooth minute wheel and a 10 leaf minute pinion to a 40 tooth hour wheel.

What should I look at next?

20240321_203407.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Doesn't sound like a loose canon pinion. A loose canon pinion results in loss of time but hand are still in sync.

Loss in syncing of hands is usually caused by missing dial washer, loose pinion of minute wheel or hands touching each other or something. 

 

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 Oh shoot, I hadn't understood OP's descriptions🙃   

OK minutes hand looses 15 minutes every twelve hours and the loss accumulates.

 The two adjacent gears shown above must either not belong to same caliber ( need a vulenteer to do some calculation because I am lazy ) or  a few gear teeth miss pinion leaves which must have gone unnoticed, a vid in slo mo shows this kinda stuff. 

 Loose revit of pinion on gear wont by itself explain the accumulation of those 15 minutes , but I check the revit for looseness anyway, it can facilitate gear teeth  to miss pinion leaves.

 

 

 

Edited by Nucejoe
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Nucejoe said:

 Oh shoot, I hadn't understood OP's descriptions🙃   

Sorry. I did my best, but English is not my native language. 😕

2 hours ago, Nucejoe said:

 

 

Thank you all, folks. I'll be back after I check whatever you suggest.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, Nucejoe said:

The two adjacent gears shown above must either not belong to same caliber ( need a vulenteer to do some calculation because I am lazy )

12:36 then 10:40 ratios, looking at the photo.

/3 the /4, so correct 12:1 reduction..

 

It must be something slipping or skipping due to allignment?

 

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, rjenkinsgb said:

12:36 then 10:40 ratios, looking at the photo.

/3 the /4, so correct 12:1 reduction..

 

It must be something slipping or skipping due to allignment?

 

How about other gears in the MINUTE TRAIN? haha.

 

 

@MartinOfPrague There are walkthroughs on this caliber on WRT, where you might find a pic of the minute train, good to make sure you have the right gears as far as the Number of teeth. 781 Is originally an ETA with a host of calibers whose parts interfit. Worth a checking In case you found no gear teeth slipping.

Finally a vid in slo mo of the train  might be needed .

Rgds

Edited by Nucejoe
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

All right, so here is the most likely explanation: one of the dial feet is broken off, therefore the the dial is not well centered and the short tube which is a part of the hour hand probably rubs against the edge of the dial hole. Thanks again for all the suggestions, though!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I have read some suggestions that it can cause wear , particularly on the fork horns of a fully treated pallet fork. I've had half a kilo of steriac acid powder on a shelf for almost a year now, might have a little play today with a heater and a jar.  I think its because it gets into their cleaning solutions Mike. Theirs or anyone else's that services the watch next time, or if they need to strip back and rebuild. Could preclean but thats all time for a pro.
    • As I'm only cleaning watches in small numbers at home, I pre-clean any significant deposits of old grease and oil before using the cleaning solutions. I scrape off deposits with pegwood and Rodico, and if really dirty, wash parts in naphtha with a brush.  So I'm happy using DX, but can understand why it's avoided by the pros.
    • I think attaching a nut to the lid to pull it off is the least destructive, any damage damage on the outside is going to an easier fix than any created when trying to push it out from the inside. Scratching up the inside of the lid , mainspring or arbor bearing will be risk. Just my opinion.
    • yes the things we read in the universe I did see some where it was either difficult to clean off or it contaminated the cleaning fluid there was some issue with cleaning. I was trying to remember something about grease where as opposed to a substance of a specific consistency they were suggesting it had a base oil with something to thicken it. That conceivably could indicate that the two could separate and that would be an issue. But there is something else going on here that I had remembered so I have a link below and the description of the 9501 notice the word that I highlighted? Notice that word appears quite a bit on this particular page like 9415 has that property all so they 8200 mainspring grease and that definitely has to be mixed up when you go to use it because it definitely separates. just in case you didn't remember that nifty word there is a Wikipedia entry. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thixotropy   https://www.moebius-lubricants.ch/en/products/greases I wonder if what you're seeing is the boron nitride left behind after cleaning. In other words it's the high-pressure part of the grease and it's probably embedding itself into the metal which is why it doesn't clean off and shouldn't be a problem?
    • Yes and no. I use Moebius 9501 synthetic grease and it is significantly runnier than the Moebius 9504 synthetic grease (and I assume Molykote DX) that I previously used. I haven't seen 9504 spread and it is in my opinion the best grease money can buy. However, my current method of cleaning doesn't remove it from the parts, so that's why I have decided to use the 9501 instead. I believe I read somewhere that Molykote DX too is difficult to clean off. Thinking about it, I'm pretty sure my 9501 grease which expired in June 2022 is runnier now than it was when it was new, but whether new or old it always needs to be stirred before use. So, that's why I treat the parts of the keyless works, cannon pinion, etc. with epilame. That was very thoughtful of you and something that had completely passed me by. Not sure what the epilame will do when it wears off in a non-oiled hole. Anyone?
×
×
  • Create New...