Jump to content

Recommended Posts

2 hours ago, Waggy said:

I thought Cartier signed one of the numerals as well  ? Anyway that movement is pretty darn rough

1 minute ago, Neverenoughwatches said:

I thought Cartier signed one of the numerals as well  ? Anyway that movement is pretty darn rough

No its pretty all darn rough. The tanks I've  ever looked had the backs screwed down.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Cartier is my thing. - well one of my things anyway.

You're okay with that.

1970's movement - Cartier has been fairly nomadic over the years with who they commissioned to supply their movements.

That's a 1970's women's tank movement made by - I want to say MST but not totally sure. These days they're all made by sellita but they've been round the houses over the years with different ebauche makers.

Couple of examples of the same movement below.

 

 

wqqwqw.jpg

s-l225.jpg

Edited by 316lad
Link to comment
Share on other sites

While Cartier did use ETA 2512 movements in some watches, the only gold plated cases I know of are from the "Must" collection, which were gold plated silver. These have "Must de Cartier" on the dial, and usually the back, and usually say "argent" on the back, with a hallmark, and the word Vermeil, and "plaque' or 20 microns" or similar. I'm quite sure that they didn't do any other plated cases. Could be wrong, but this one looks fishy to me, poor engraving and dial quality too.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, 316lad said:

Cartier is my thing. - well one of my things anyway.

You're okay with that.

1970's movement - Cartier has been fairly nomadic over the years with who they commissioned to supply their movements.

That's a 1970's women's tank movement made by - I want to say MST but not totally sure. These days they're all made by sellita but they've been round the houses over the years with different ebauche makers.

Couple of examples of the same movement below.

 

 

wqqwqw.jpg

s-l225.jpg

A serial number on the caseback would be lovely to see.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, nickelsilver said:

While Cartier did use ETA 2512 movements in some watches, the only gold plated cases I know of are from the "Must" collection, which were gold plated silver. These have "Must de Cartier" on the dial, and usually the back, and usually say "argent" on the back, with a hallmark, and the word Vermeil, and "plaque' or 20 microns" or similar. I'm quite sure that they didn't do any other plated cases. Could be wrong, but this one looks fishy to me, poor engraving and dial quality too.

Plated silver or gold doesn't have hallmarks. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, RichardHarris123 said:

Are you @316ladsaying that it's genuine ?

I'll stick my neck out here and say yes, I do.

The dial's a bit iffy but the rest is fine. Not a great era for Cartier - the early 70's - has to be said. Gold/ silver plating (why not solid), etc.

The OP expresses scepticism about the authenticity because one of the numerals isn't signed - usually the "7" as they are these days. Cartier didn't start doing that until about 2004. This is a '70's watch.

That's a bit like someone expressing the same doubt about a Rolex Sub from the '80's - because it doesn't have the laser etched crown on the crystal or the engraving and the serial number on the rehaut.

As I say - it was a low point for Cartier horologically - the early '70's, until they got their mojo back in the early '80's and started producing the iconic re-issue of the SS and gold Santos, etc, and then they were elevated back to where they belong; Watch as pure, beautiful jewellery. Interesting brand over the years.

 

Got a women's Santos on the bench at the moment - you can see the "7" hasn't the vertical Cartier - and this is from 1993.

Nice watch - has seen some abuse. Always tricky to gauge what the customer expects me to do  in terms of Resto. Probably best just to polish it up a bit - you can - the gold bezel IS solid Gold - as are the screws on the bracelet.

So, you see within 15/ 20 years of making the OP's ebay watch - Cartier had got their sh1t back together.

Still a bit of a rubbish movement though - ETA by this time.

IMG_0519.jpg

IMG_1494.jpeg

Edited by 316lad
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, 316lad said:

The edges aern't "Crude" they're time worn down.

Take a look at a slightly better example:

https://vintagewatchoutlet.com/products/cartier-tank-manual-wind-18k-gold-electroplated-vintage-1970s-mens-watch-23mm-1

 

Where’s the photo of the back of that watch- or any Carrier tank with an ‘electroplated’ snap back case. I’ve never seen one like that before. If the watch in question is definitively from the 70s there should be pictures of others out there…

now I see the other photos, yes…

Edited by rehajm
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, 316lad said:

 

The edges aern't "Crude" they're time worn down

 

well, yes. it is similar to the watch in better condition- but both are certainly more crude than the usual design….and worn down bad enough to be that rough but haven't worn through the plating, as has happened on the front corners?

Yowza- imma pass and let someone else enjoy the deal on this one…

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, rehajm said:

well, yes. it is similar to the watch in better condition- but both are certainly more crude than the usual design….and worn down bad enough to be that rough but haven't worn through the plating, as has happened on the front corners?

Yowza- imma pass and let someone else enjoy the deal on this one…

I think that's a good move but not necessarily because of your scpeticism about it being a fake.

It represents a "dud" period in Cartier horology. Collectors aern't interested in this stuff - neither does it particularly grab the eye - design or build-wise.

If the OP has thoughts about doing some Resto and selling it on - I'd pitch my bid at no more than £500 - though I suspect it will go for far more than that. But that doesn't make it validated.

I adore Cartier - but I wouldn't bother with it - it's representational of dark days - Quartz Crisis was blowing a Hooley, nobody knew what to do, marketing people flapping about, etc. It has nothing to mitigate it's "cheapness" and oppotunism in a dynamically changing Swiss watchmaking industry in crisis.

And Cheap - was never a Cartier selling point anyway.

It would be a pass from me too.

Edited by 316lad
  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, 316lad said:

I'm sorry - I can't teach you how to surf the Internet.

I was willing to listen to your opinion because I have read that Cartier produced some pretty average watches in the past.  But please don't question my intelligence, the link you provided only had on photo. 

  • Like 1
  • Sad 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, RichardHarris123 said:

I was willing to listen to your opinion because I have read that Cartier produced some pretty average watches in the past.  But please don't question my intelligence, the link you provided only had on photo. 

I'm so sorry if you thought I was - I was questioning my own ability to teach with my own limited intelligence.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

36 minutes ago, RichardHarris123 said:

Are you @316ladsaying that it's genuine ?

The question is what is genuine?  Cartier is essentially known for designing and making jewellery so Cartier didn't make the movement. Cartier cases have serial numbers, there is no serial number so they didn't make the case, and their cases are held together by screws. If they employed another company to make the case , did someone else also make the dial. At best Cartier commissioned someone to make it, so its not really Cartier. There are a few examples on ebay the same as this, not sure if we can use that as evidence for it not to be fake unless we are suggesting only one fake has been made. Surely the Cartier tank is in the top list for most copied and faked watch of all time. Understandably i cant figure out why a world renowned Jeweller would put their name to this.

 

1 hour ago, rehajm said:

Where’s the photo of the back of that watch- or any Carrier tank with an ‘electroplated’ snap back case. I’ve never seen one like that before. If the watch in question is definitively from the 70s there should be pictures of others out there…

now I see the other photos, yes…

 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

59 minutes ago, 316lad said:

I'm so sorry if you thought I was - I was questioning my own ability to teach with my own limited intelligence.

This is a friendly site, every one pitches in and helps each other.  The advanced members must sometimes roll their eyes at the questions we amateurs ask but they do their best. 

I have not come across such a arrogant member as yourself on here before and hopefully I won't do again.  

  • Like 1
  • Sad 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Similar Content

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I installed the donor pallet fork and now the watch is running, but only for 10 seconds. The lower side of the pallet fork only seems to go into the hole when I add the bridge. A visual check shows lower and upper are properly seated. I'll check the hairspring.
    • I get that, but you're making unnecessary work for yourself. Resign yourself to having to give the movement a final clean and lubrication once you've fixed the problem. You probably won't need to redo the balance or the barrel in any case. The oil captured between the hole and cap jewels will still be good even if you've had it in and out of the movement half a dozen times.
    • Thanks, some great advice. I have to go over the train every time I refit anything as each wheel has it's own bridge (cock?). They have a tiny amount of play so you can tighten them down in slightly different positions. This changes the gear mesh. I went through all that when I first started having issues with it. Movement works isn't fitted at the moment and nor is the seconds hand. The only reason I'm cleaning it every time is because each time I assemble it, I lubricate it. Mainly because you have to remove the balance wheel and hairspring to oil the top balance jewel. It's a pain so I always live in hope it will be going together for the last time. As the top one has to be oiled, so does the bottom one. Then I may as well do the train wheels.... I could just do the whole thing dry, but if it works, I'll still have to disassemble the balance again and it's always a risk. The hair spring is pinned, the cap jewel screws are underneath (stupid design. To be fair, the 3 separate bridges is a stupid design too).   I'll play with it more tomorrow and gather some more info, pics, and maybe some video.   Thanks for all the advice.
    • It's not great, IF you did the test without the pallet installed. Assuming 18000 beats per day, 25 seconds is 125 beats or about 62 oscillations. You should get 100 or more. If the pallet was in place when you did the test it means nothing. Either way, this is not the principal issue. I was going to mention that I recently worked out that I get much better pics with a loupe held in front of the phone camera than trying to shoot down the microscope. I use a 20x loupe, but try with whatever you have. The roller jewel (or impulse jewel) could be an issue, particularly if it is loose, but this is also not the main issue. Get some clear pics so you can ask the experienced members here about it after you have addressed the main issue. Nothing in the escapement explains the rapid deterioration you're seeing 20 minutes after winding. That suggests an issue in the train rather than the escapement. The failure to self-start after it has been running a while confirms that power is not getting to the escapement. If it was me, and I was confident I had eliminated the barrel as the source of the problem, I'd be looking further down the train. I'd first make sure the canon pinion was out to eliminate the motion works as a source of the problem. Also make sure the centre seconds pivot is removed, if it has one, or the seconds hand if it has sub-seconds. If that didn't make a difference I'd then work my way through each wheel starting at the centre wheel. Is it sitting level? At the right height? Does it have just enough end shake? Does it have excessive side shake? What happens if you touch the upper pivot with a piece of pegwood with just a little bit of power in the mainspring? What about the lower pivot? Once I was certain there was no problem there I'd move on to the third wheel, and so on all the way down the train. Just because the train runs freely with the pallet out does not mean it has no problems as excessive side shake (for example) will only be an issue when the train is under tension. Finally, I advise you to stop re-cleaning until you have fixed it. I know the temptation, but it's just a distraction. You need to be systematic and methodical.
    • If you short the two blue wires together, does the unit chime? I have a similar chime unit that is designed to work with a quartz movement with an hourly trigger switch.  I'm not aware of any movements or chiming units that chime quarterly.
×
×
  • Create New...