Jump to content

Cleaning on the cheap! (Bicycle Degreaser)


Recommended Posts

I am kind of expecting a few "Oh my god what are you doing type comments.... but here we go....)

I have been following advice I have found here and there for cleaning watch parts - with very limited access to chemicals and without the expense of a cleaning machine.

My process has been to put the small parts into little mesh baskets and then put those baskets and the bridges and plates into a sequence of jars which I put in a cheap ultrasonic bath full of warm (50º C) water.  I then separately take balance and pallet forks and just soak them for 20mins or so in lighter fluid before giving them a fast rinse in IPA before putting them in my food drying thing.

Jar 1.  8mins  or 16 mins... deionised water with a few drips of washing up liquid (Zalo)
Jar 2. 5 mins 99.9% Isopropyl Alcohol
Jar 3. 3 mins 99.9% Isopropyl Alcohol

To be honest my results are not great!

So I decided to try adding a prewash to the above list.

Jar 0. 8mins deionised water with a few drops of "Muc Off - Drivechain Degreaser" (This is a water soluble degreaser that I have been using in a 1:9 mix in the same ultrasonic cleaner to clean bicycle chains)

The difference has been night and day - tray of clean parts!
 

IMG_6183.thumb.jpg.486ecd72f72e912db8a4b8fc8f638409.jpg
I also had a balance from another movement that was sticking together and had black gunk on the hair spring - lighter fuel had not done the trick so I thought... why not!

I put it alone in one of the mesh baskets and put it through Jar 0. and then Jar 1. on my cleaning process before taking out the wet hairspring and gave it a quick dip in IPA and then into the food dryer.

Once dry it looked nice and clean - the shellac on the roller jewel looked intact and the watch that I had taken it from that was all over the show on the timegrapher started to produce steady results.

Planning to find a junk pallet fork and put it pure degreaser to see if survives...

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, ColinC said:

Oh my god what are you doing type comments

I like that I think I'll just quote that.

Now that that's out of the way I need to Google something first. My geography isn't the best and it looks like you live in Norway.

 

8 hours ago, ColinC said:

with very limited access to chemicals

So Norway does not let you play with chemicals how sad is a lot of fun things you can do with chemistry both good and bad but without the chemicals well Definitely can present a problem.

8 hours ago, ColinC said:

Jar 0. 8mins deionised water with a few drops of "Muc Off - Drivechain Degreaser" (This is a water soluble degreaser that I have been using in a 1:9 mix in the same ultrasonic cleaner to clean bicycle chains)

Amazon's not being helpful looks like it's premixed you could spray it on and I don't get a material safety sheet. I'm rather curious about the substance that it's made from I'm not suggesting that there are chemicals in there by the way you're not allowed to have chemicals but they still might be in there and it be curious what they're called.

image.png.76a112c5a31b878d7144a3418cfb33f6.png

 

Then I have a suggestion as they do make commercial water-based cleaners why don't you follow the recommendation that they have. You can clean in your water-based cleaner but you do want to rinse off the cleaner with water. You're going right from your cleaning into isopropyl alcohol I would put a water bath in between maybe even two of them then you can go to your alcohol and then to the dryer.

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I feel you, getting access to the proper chemicals in Oslo is not trivial and shipping is expensive! I also started out with jars of White Spirit (the Norwegian kind which, as far as I can tell, is pure naphtha) in the ultrasonic followed by a rinse in IPA. I was also getting poor results, but that might have been due to my weak ultrasonic (from Clas Ohlson, the local equivalent of Harbor Freight).

I have since gone over to the old-school approach using a set of stiff paint brushes and small jars of White Spirit and IPA. You can approach perfection using this method, it all comes down to patience... An added benefit is that you are forced to really scrutinize each part, so spotting bent/broken pivots, damaged wheel teeth etc. becomes that much easier. The ultrasonic is only used for cleaning cases and bracelets these days.

Edited by fellerts
fixed spelling
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, RichardHarris123 said:

Be careful with the dihydrogen monoxide.

 

2 minutes ago, HectorLooi said:

Yes. People have died from excessive ingestion of the stuff.

It can also be quite dangerous if inhaled......

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 9/12/2023 at 3:55 PM, fellerts said:

have since gone over to the old-school approach using a set of stiff paint brushes and small jars of White Spirit and IPA. You can approach perfection using this method, it all comes down to patience... An added benefit is that you are forced to really scrutinize each part, so spotting bent/broken pivots, damaged wheel teeth etc. becomes that much easier. The ultrasonic is only used for cleaning cases and bracelets these days.

Edited Tuesday at 03:56 PM by fellerts

When i feel ocd inclined i like to get personal and hand clean everything. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, ColinC said:

So I just ran a little experiment with the degreaser - Pallet fork 20 mins sitting in the solution undiluted 

Appears to be no damage to the shellac 


Before
IMG_6266.jpg.1919b4a9a037bb9dfd3073a763083efd.jpg

 

After

IMG_6267.jpg.069fb823e14b58d0eb35f7e059600125.jpg

 But is there a residue? Watch cleaning is all about being clean. No residue. Because whatever residue remains could react with the microscope amount of lubricant and cause it to spread or other bad stuff. Old high performance watch cleaning machines used 2 rinses to get the cleaning solution off; then 3 became the norm. Now, new gen machines have 4.

 

I remember watching my mom or dad wipe down the counter with a soapy sponge, and be happy it was clean. My little brain was saying "but, there's still soap there!". Maybe that set me on the path of watchmaking. Rinse rinse rinse (and if you want a watch parts account rinse again.... in isopropyl alcohol!!)

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

46 minutes ago, nickelsilver said:

But is there a residue?

In the test case here I didn't really check for residue - I was really checking if the chemicals damaged the shellac and that seems fine.

In the process where I used it as a prewash I am pretty confident that there was no residue left.

But I get what you are saying about more rinses - The degreaser turns the water cloudy in the prewash and you can see that cloudiness get transferred to the first wash - however the next jar appears clear and the 4th jar is looking great.  However if I had expensive cleaning solutions, I can totally see myself adding an extra rinse between the prewash and the wash.

I also know from cleaning bicycle chains that it is important to get the degreaser off otherwise your next round of lubrication will fail. One of the nice things about this degreaser is that it is water soluble and easy to get rid of for due to that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • One way is to file it by hand. Good file with sharp edge is needed. Another way is with the aid of milling attachment. There is one more way, thyat is really only on the lathe, but the arbor has to be attached perpendicular to the axis of the spindle. Will be easier to show pictures than to explain this.
    • giving up so soon? then the feelings of frustrations is common for all of us. At work I've requested a cannon? To be technically correct I like to get a black powder cannon as I think I be quite enjoyable to fire some of the watch movements off into the distance never to be seen again unfortunately I don't think I'm going to get my request. So yes we all have frustrations like I have a frustration with this discussion I don't suppose before you run away you could give us the size of the movement and a photograph of the dial side with the keyless parts.  as I'm still rather curious about who made this watch.
    • It wasn't a rookie mistake Nev , i should have know better with me being a joiner. After a hole another a wider bit has nothing to keep it to center and the outside of the flutes draw the drill bit in fast because of no material present. I must have done it thousands of times in timber and plastic . It was a senior moment mistake. 😄
    • Don't give up. You just need patience and practice. Don't use force or try to screw down the plate before making sure everything is in place. My first few watches took me like 45 minutes to get the train wheels in. Now it usually takes me less than a minute. Make sure that all the bottom pivots are in their respective holes before putting on the top plate. Then apply gentle pressure with a pegwood or gloved finger. Start from the barrel, 2nd wheel, 3rd wheel.... and finally the escape wheel. You can feel the plate drop each time you get a pivot in. If you experience the pivots that you have already gotten in coming out of their holes when you work on other wheels down line, you can put 1 or 2 screws nearer the barrel side in but don't exert any force on the screws. Just lightly turn the screws until you feel pressure and backoff 1/4 turn. This will prevent the plates from separating.  I use a homemade tool with a brass wire, shaped like an oiler to lightly touch the wheels to guide them into place. I find that an oiler made of hardened steel can leave scratches on the brass wheels. Once you think you have gotten all the pivots in, test it by using a blower to blow on the escape wheel. It should spin freely. Continue applying pressure on the top plate with the pegwood or finger until you lightly tighten all the screws. Don't tighten fully yet until you reconfirm that the wheels are able to spin freely. And reconfirm again after you have fully tightened all the screws. What you are experiencing is normal. All of us have gone through it. Don't work on watches when you are tired or frustrated. All of us can tell you what that leads to. But I'm sure you'll experience a few hard lessons even after reading this advice. It's only human. Go forth and practice. Good luck!
    • by the way this is very confusing to me? You have a 7s26a and you're comparing it to a 7s26b which is confusing to me because they're not the same? Watch companies are rather amusing when it comes the part numbers seemingly watches with similar  numbers as you're implying should be exactly identical but in this case they are very very dramatically different for instance the 7s26a balance part number is 0310 020 the 7s26b has a different part number 0310 197 as the part numbers are entirely different there must be a reason it noticed that I made two terms in the quote above in bold regulator pins are versus the etachron  system. In addition to changing the regulation part more than likely they change the hairspring. So this would typically main you wouldn't build a swap balance completes from one type to the other because they will be entirely different. this is where looking at the technical guide might yield some amusing information. you'll note in the 7s26b  service guide it explains what the difference is. It makes a reference to the balance staff which is totally inconsequential for this discussion. But the really big difference is the A  version has conventional regulator pins and the B  has is the Etachron  system. In @Jon excellent images up above he didn't explain something? if you look carefully at the images below you'll notice that the outer terminal curve is different  as a guest to accommodate the etachron  system it looks like the terminal curve is farther out. So yes exactly as the parts list indicates the balance completes will look different because they are different. Because they are different there are not interchangeable. so basically because the letter changes at the end in this particular case we end up with two separate balance completes as proven by the parts numbers. Balance completes that are entirely different to accommodate the regulation system conceivably with entirely different characteristics of timing as they are entirely different. So your observation of the balances are different shape is correct they are different.      
×
×
  • Create New...