Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

 Lets see TG print outs and  the max delta in various positions. 

Having bought  so many fakes,  I can claim expertship now.Â Â đŸ˜©

 

 

  • Like 1
Posted

Usually Tudors indicate Chronometer on the dial, then officially Certified follows. 

There might be exceptions that don't, but TG reveals the heart.

I bet my two cents on FAKE .

Posted
1 hour ago, Nucejoe said:

Usually Tudors indicate Chronometer on the dial

Depends on the model.

Looking at the Tudor website the model ranges that do not state "chronometer" or "officially certified" are the Ranger, Tudor Royal, 1926, and Clair De Rose.

LWS's watch looks similar to the styling in the 1926 range, although the current range appears to feature at least some numerals on the dials, I can't see one that is batons only, so the jury is still out.

  • Thanks 1
Posted

Why not to glue a M10-Nut with Cyanoacrylat (Superglue..) to the back,

afterwards it should be possible to unglue with Acetone, this was the Solution

for some Cases as reported in this Forum. Or else buy a 5537-Clone Set from China......

 

regards,

Ernst

  • Like 1
Posted
35 minutes ago, Sirius said:

Why not to glue a M10-Nut with Cyanoacrylat (Superglue..) to the back,

afterwards it should be possible to unglue with Acetone, this was the Solution

for some Cases as reported in this Forum. Or else buy a 5537-Clone Set from China......

 

regards,

Ernst

That is a great method which have used. But I have never used it for reinstallation.

Posted
6 hours ago, Marc said:

Depends on the model.

Looking at the Tudor website the model ranges that do not state "chronometer" or "officially certified" are the Ranger, Tudor Royal, 1926, and Clair De Rose.

So, is the oscilator in above models  COSC certifed chronograde ?

Thats the $200  question. 

 

 

Posted
19 hours ago, LittleWatchShop said:

I need to get a tool to open these, but I don't want to spend real money...any ideas

I've seen people claim that the ball used for removing screw backs can remove Rolex backs but if the back is on really tight you do need the tool.

18 hours ago, Sirius said:

Why not to glue a M10-Nut with Cyanoacrylat (Superglue..) to the back,

afterwards it should be possible to unglue with Acetone, this was the Solution

for some Cases as reported in this Forum.

Another thing the use rather than superglue is epoxy. The interesting thing with epoxy is that if you drop the back a pot of boiling water then there is no problem taking off whatever's glued together. I learned that trick from the material house the used it before removing crystals that were  epoxy  in the epoxy basically gets soft.

  • Like 1
Posted

Sorry folks, insufficent info in my previous statement.

I think LWS has a genuine Tudor, its oscilator is Chronograde but the watch doesn't have Chronometer complication. 

So Marc said it correctly. 

 

 

Posted
4 hours ago, JohnR725 said:

I've seen people claim that the ball used for removing screw backs can remove Rolex backs but if the back is on really tight you do need the tool.

I tried the ball with my Rolex without success 😉

  • Like 1
Posted
1 hour ago, LittleWatchShop said:

I continue to lean toward Genuine


2023-02-07 08_20_02-20230207_081201.jpg ‎- Photos.png

...although...seems that the serial number should be between the lugs

A genuine Tudor:

4E207952-774E-418A-95E9-7ECF9CCC9F2D.jpeg

  • Like 1
Posted

Listen to the heart. 

 A low grade ETA  balance complete can be fitted into  a Chrono grade Tudor, but the Tudor  then runs only as good as a $400 west end watch. 

The tg print out you posted is a poor listener and analyzer, yet I believe you have a genuine Tudor. 

 

  • Like 1
Posted
On 2/4/2023 at 2:20 PM, LittleWatchShop said:

I got in trade for a clock repair. I put about $50 worth of parts in the clock

So, with a little more data, I will be convinced that it is genuine.  I will give it back to the guy I made the trade with.  At the time, I thought it was a copy and so did he.  He was kinda clueless, so whatever he thought about the watch is not a data point. 

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
  • 2 weeks later...
Posted
4 hours ago, LittleWatchShop said:

Yup.  Its the real deal.  Has an ETA 2824 movement.

 

On 2/7/2023 at 7:45 PM, Nucejoe said:

Listen to the heart. 

 A low grade ETA  balance complete can be fitted into  a Chrono grade Tudor, but the Tudor  then runs only as good as a $400 west end watch. 

The tg print out you posted is a poor listener and analyzer, yet I believe you have a genuine Tudor. 

 

Haha, 

I want a thums up from nicklesilver on this one. 

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • If you see at least one thread protruding, or even a half, then you may have a chance using this "tool", but don't squeeze hard. Lot's of patience, and if you notice any signs of loctite or other adhesives, then apply several drops of acetone on top of broken stem. Use heat (hair dryer) also. You should be able gradually turn it counterclockwise, just like i did on this broken Timex stem, which was glued with something like nail hardener. Then you can use an extender to save your broken stem. https://m.media-amazon.com/images/I/513DVvkfW5L.__AC_SX300_SY300_QL70_ML2_.jpg   You can also try cutting a small grove / slot on top of the broken stem to use 0.7mm flat screwdriver.   Depending on the Crown material and Stem material, you can try dissolving the stem. 
    • How long had it been without any wind before you first put it on the timegrapher?  Perhaps there was some debris / old lubricant that loosened up while you were waiting to do the 24 hour reading? I recently serviced a Seiko 6319 that immediately after service was absolutely horrible on the timegrapher - 24 hours later (without me doing anything) it was rock solid!  I was a little surprised by this (as I have seen improvements in amplitude after letting it run in but never a watch going from useless to great!). I was suspicious that some dirt must still be in there so I took it apart and cleaned and lubcricated it again and had exactly the same experience - snow storm that after some hours turned into a nice straigh line with good amplitudeÂ đŸ€·â€â™‚ïž
    • Yes, I know it was able to run before just enough that everything supposed to be affixed with shellac could fall out. I won't get back to work on this watch for several days at least, but one thing you mentioned about the banking pin adjustments being intended for fork horn clearance got me wondering.... The last adjustment I made to the entry stone yesterday did not solve the problem when the balance is installed. The escape teeth can't quite clear the stone when the balance swings. But I thought it was going to work because manually snapping the fork back and forth did allow the escape wheel to advance almost all the time. I wonder if there's another issue with the impulse jewel, that I have to shellac again anyway. I am going to measure the fork slot and the jewel because I am curious if it is the right size or possibly narrower than it should be. My thinking is if the horn clearance is too great maybe it is not getting enough impulse to clear the escape tooth. But pushing the fork with a tool can move it far enough to clear the escape wheel tooth.  I'll see later in the week. I didn't expect a big challenge from this watch because it ticked for 5 minutes before stopping without shellac. As always I was way wrong.
    • I had one success (and one failure) dissolving a broken stem out of a crown with Alum. The successes was a stainless steel crown and a milder steel stem. A Tag Heuer 2000 Automatic - here with the solution at around 60ÂșC I could see small bubbles coming up from the stump of the stem and it took maybe 6 hours to disolve I tried to repeat this with another watch and it did nothing.....  This was A Bulova Ambassador with what again looked like a stainless steel crown.  
    • That good to know in one way.
×
×
  • Create New...