Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

Found this mainspring winder that is made in the UK. I use a Ollie Baker but did have trouble sourcing one the Uk. The winder is a “Horowind” it certainly looks solidly built. At present the maker does not have a website but sells on eBay. I tried to get more information and was told they are in the process of putting up a YouTube demonstrating. 
 See link:

https://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/265727125835?hash=item3dde92294b:g:QV0AAOSwakpiny2w

 

 

Edited by clockboy
Posted

It looks easier to operate than the Ollie Baker. The click to change direction is far better than the Ollie which can be a bit fiddly. Also only two chucks required for the different size arbours. The Ollie requires changing arbour holders to match the different size arbours. It certainly looks solidly built. 

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)

The one sold at Cousins is a very good copy of the Ollie. It might be the one I purchased. However you still have to purchase a set of let down keys such as these. 
 

7FA00FD5-6352-4F37-9D09-DB988659BB52.jpeg.95d9d0674037f81d9b26ce4b04496584.jpeg

Edited by clockboy
Posted
1 hour ago, oldhippy said:

This is very similar to the one I have. It will handle even the very large fusee mainsprings. Its a fraction of the cost of the others.  Just make sure you wear a pair of thick gloves when using. 

https://www.cousinsuk.com/product/mainspring-winder-bergeon

Before I got a Webster winder, I had something similar to this. Only used it once. It's just too scary for my liking.

Did you use containment rings with this style winder or did you grip the end of the spring with a long nose pliers?

Posted
1 hour ago, oldhippy said:

I used long nose pliers. This type doesn't have containment rings. 

 

4 hours ago, oldhippy said:

This is very similar to the one I have. It will handle even the very large fusee mainsprings. Its a fraction of the cost of the others.  Just make sure you wear a pair of thick gloves when using. 

https://www.cousinsuk.com/product/mainspring-winder-bergeon

I have have the slightly "fancier" version of that one, but have made up a collection of rings; I have done it with pliers but dang, it's scary. Although necessary for some springs like certain Zenith ones that have an attached tongue end like a watch mainspring.

 

Do you have a pic of the pliers you use? Have you had them slip? 😵

Posted

Just a bog standard pair like this. Slipping out of the pliers no not that I can recall. I have removed and inserted some really big fusee springs and never had any accident with clock springs. I must be lucky. 

Always get a pair with red handles they hide the blood. 🤣

download.jpg

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
  • Haha 1
  • 4 months later...
Posted
On 6/9/2022 at 2:49 AM, HectorLooi said:

Before I got a Webster winder

I just picked up a Webster from Timesavers for doing yet another Kundo anniversary(yes I know-glutton for punishment). Question: with this winder do I need to purchase seperate arbors or can I use the barrel arbor to uninstall/install mainspring? do I need letdown tools? 

Posted

The original arbor will fit into the chuck without any problems. But you'll need a set of containment rings to capture the spring and remove it from the barrel.

The letdown tools are needed to power down the mainsprings safely before taking the plates apart. Don't be tempted to save on them. All of us who have, had black fingernails to show for our folly.

  • Thanks 1
Posted
11 hours ago, oldhippy said:

Didn't it come with instructions?

I should have been more specific-I had just ordered  one but it hasn't arrived yet and sure it comes with instructions. Just didn't show any arbors with it. doesn't matter for now anyway-Timesavers just sent me an email stating that the winder is out of stock for maybe 6-8 weeks or better, and that their Ollie Baker is on a waiting list  first come first serve basis. so, its back to the ol' standby ebay. I looked for the style of winder that you used to use OH but I thought I might be patient hoping to find a good deal. Bergeon is out of the question. Prices are obnoxious. 

11 hours ago, HectorLooi said:

The original arbor will fit into the chuck without any problems. But you'll need a set of containment rings to capture the spring and remove it from the barrel.

The letdown tools are needed to power down the mainsprings safely before taking the plates apart. Don't be tempted to save on them. All of us who have, had black fingernails to show for our folly.

 

11 hours ago, HectorLooi said:

The original arbor will fit into the chuck without any problems. But you'll need a set of containment rings to capture the spring and remove it from the barrel.

The letdown tools are needed to power down the mainsprings safely before taking the plates apart. Don't be tempted to save on them. All of us who have, had black fingernails to show for our folly.

ouch.

I just replied to old H and I just made a successful bid on a used webster that comes with 9 sleeves and several containment clamps/rings. I went back to timesavers and bought the new arbor support attachment for it. I was trying to remember how I did the first clock as I recall I used the winding key as a letdown, but didn't have to-there was no power left in  the mainspring(i didn't have a winding tool yet either). is it ok to use the key for this? Otherwise I'll get the letdown tools.

Weasol was right-darn things are as addictive as they are frustrating. Why is that?🤔

Posted

A cheap version of a let down tool is a hardwood shaft with a slot cut in it to fit the key. fit over the key take up the slack and release the click and let the shaft rotate in your hand as a brake. Befor I built my own mainspring tool this is what I did you years and still got my own fingers.😆

  • Like 2
Posted
6 hours ago, MechanicMike said:

I went back to timesavers and bought the new arbor support attachment for it.

The arbor support is a nice accessory to have. But as I use the Webster more and more, I find that it's not absolutely necessary. I just hold the barrel in a gloved hand and use it like the old English pattern winders.

And safety equipment is absolutely essential. I use a cut-proof glove on my left hand and sometimes a wrist guard for extra protection. I always imagine a mainspring breaking and the jagged end slitting my wrist. 🥴

I also use a face shield instead of just goggles. 

@oldhippy has taught my how to do some really scary things like removing a broken spring from the barrel, removing the tail of some mainsprings with a pair of long nose pliers and holding it till the power is released. And I thank God for every accident free adventure.

Stay safe and enjoy Mike.

  • Thanks 1
Posted

I picked this up on ebay really cheap because someone listed it as a lathe attachment.  It is a Webster-style winder/unwinder.

I modified it by adding the 7/16 deep-well socket and the 1/2" male socket adapter.

The deep-well socket accepts the letdown tools listed earlier in this thread.

After I got this working, I found an Ollie Backer, so I don't use this one any more, but pretty proud of my mods.

2022-10-21 12_50_49-20221021_124253.jpg ‎- Photos.png

2022-10-21 12_50_35-20221021_124259.jpg ‎- Photos.png

  • Like 1
Posted
On 10/20/2022 at 8:34 PM, HectorLooi said:

And safety equipment is absolutely essential.

absolutely agree. When I did the first one and I saw the mainspring I thought to myself, "that thing is a beast! a grenade just looking for an eye or some soft tissue to destroy!" got my old welding gloves on standby and broke out my old faceshield-thanks for the tip. Webster should be here tomorrow!

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Where I work everything incoming watches whatever detailed descriptions are taken entered into a computer program and photograph of each item. Then ideally although it depends on who's doing the paperwork detailed descriptions can be quite good other times there lacking. Like I really like it with pocket watches if they would record the serial number it avoids confusion later on. Then when watch repairs are completed that is also entered in. It's one of the amusements I learned when I was in school instructor had a shop and commented about the important aspect of keeping detailed records of repairs. Because oftentimes a customer who got a new crystal will come back later on when the watch doesn't work and expect you to fix the entire watch for free. Then you can remind them that they just got a crystal. Strangely enough that keeps coming up or occasionally comes up where I work now. One of the problems of using the service marks on the case is that in the case of pocket watches oftentimes that's not the original case. Then case marks? What I was doing warranty work for a company I used to describe a code number in the back of the case and it would tell me the next time I see the watch that basically what I did I made no attempt at keeping track of customers because we had literally thousands of them I think they sold 30,000 of these watches and they would come back by the hundreds because they had a lifetime warranty. Yes that's a story all of itself but I would put a code number that would reference what was done to the watch the last time and think I had a date in there somehow so it did tell a story if you knew the code. Another shop I once worked out the number would reference the page in the book. So other than knowing we had been in there you would have no idea what happened because you have to go look at the page in the book to see what happened. Then the problem of how you examine a watch you should examine the watch in detail every single time to avoid complications. Although on vintage watches and this is a of amusement I have at work when people ask something and I say of the watches done when it leaves. This is because on vintage oftentimes problems won't show up until the watches much farther into the repair like it's now running and you discover things that you can't discover before because it wasn't running to discover them that also become sometimes difficult to have exact rigid prices are estimates of repairs or in the case of a pocket watch you may not find out if a casing problem to later on when you case it up in the watches running. I was just thinking for all those people that would like to leave a mark maybe you should learn to do what some of the past watchmakers did? Leave a mark but leave it in such a way that no one will ever find it? Typically not done for repair purposes but done for other reasons like identifying it's legit. I have a friend with a Gruen watch and one of the Roman numbers the bottom line that just looks like a line under extreme magnification actually says Gruen watch company or something equivalent. So here's a link showing how to mark your watch without being seen although that's not the actual title. So if you can learn micro engraving you can engrave the watch someplace probably just about any place you just have to remember where you put it. https://cnaluxury.channelnewsasia.com/obsessions/how-to-prove-if-watches-are-authentic-secret-signatures-182516  
    • I have acquired a Citizen Leopard 36000 watch. My reason for purchasing it was my desire to own a timepiece with a 36,000 BPH movement, and the price was reasonable. Another motivating factor was gaining hands-on experience with the mechanism. The watch is in good condition, but I intend to fully disassemble it for maintenance. First and foremost, if anyone has prior experience with this particular model, I would greatly appreciate their insights. I do not have access to Citizen’s specialized lubricants and will need to use the ones available to me, such as 9010, 8000, and 8300 grease. Additionally, I do not possess the appropriate oil for the pallet jewels and will only be able to clean them.
    • Hello all, I am working on an older Valjoux Chrono. It doesn't have a stamp on the movement anywhere but I believe it is a Valjoux 72. I installed the train of wheels and they will not turn. The problem appears to be the 4th wheel and the escape wheel are not interfacing correctly. I had to replace both of these parts as the pivots were broken on each. I sourced genuine Valjoux/ETA replacements. I think the problem is with the escape wheel as all the wheels turn perfectly if I remove just the escape wheel.  My question to those with more Valjoux experience is am I mistaken? Is this some other model altogether and I have the wrong part or parts?    
    • I would remove the wheels, check for damage and if not damaged, clean. 
    • Thanks for the replies! Here's a photo of the front of the clock and a GIF animation of the movement (exposed by removing the black cap in the centre of the clock). You can see the behaviour of the gears. It's a fairly valuable clock from the 80s (Braun ABW 35). I'm not sure if replacing the movement would diminish the value, so I'd prefer to keep the original parts if it's easy to fix. But since the movement itself is pretty generic, I guess, maybe replacing it wouldn't make any difference with regard to the value of the clock? Or would it? I suppose the value is mostly in the design.
×
×
  • Create New...