Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Hey guys whats the story on these zodiac 88. I have just held the arbour with a pin vice to turn the barrel to check resistance and to see if it returned. And it dont so i thought i would check the mainspring but according to the barrel it says do not open.Which is strange as i have a spare zodiac mainspring  to swap it with. But how do i swap it if you cannot open the barrel. Is the barrel unusable if i do open it?

Anyone done one of these before.

Cheers

gary

IMG_20220408_214137.jpg

IMG_20220408_214140.jpg

IMG_20220408_214145.jpg

Posted
21 minutes ago, gary17 said:

Hey guys whats the story on these zodiac 88. I have just held the arbour with a pin vice to turn the barrel to check resistance and to see if it returned. And it dont so i thought i would check the mainspring but according to the barrel it says do not open.Which is strange as i have a spare zodiac mainspring  to swap it with. But how do i swap it if you cannot open the barrel. Is the barrel unusable if i do open it?

Anyone done one of these before.

Cheers

gary

IMG_20220408_214137.jpg

IMG_20220408_214140.jpg

IMG_20220408_214145.jpg

 

22 minutes ago, gary17 said:

Hey guys whats the story on these zodiac 88. I have just held the arbour with a pin vice to turn the barrel to check resistance and to see if it returned. And it dont so i thought i would check the mainspring but according to the barrel it says do not open.Which is strange as i have a spare zodiac mainspring  to swap it with. But how do i swap it if you cannot open the barrel. Is the barrel unusable if i do open it?

Anyone done one of these before.

Cheers

gary

IMG_20220408_214137.jpg

IMG_20220408_214140.jpg

IMG_20220408_214145.jpg

Hi Gary. I think I had one these a few months ago on a cheap lucerne.  Sadly I pretty much destroyed the full watch as it was one of my first attempted fixes from a job lot. Not entirely  my fault if I'm honest,  it was unbelievably cheap and nasty in every respect and I'm sure it had an unserviceable mainspring inside which suggested a pretty much throw away item. Unfortunately  that's what I did with it with no inspection or investigation of the barrel. It does look like you've had a little go. There is no slot to enter with a pry this suggests do not open, also the do not open in English and in German stamped on it suggests do not open lol. Give me a moment to get serious, I can when I try. Does the barrel lid curl around the inside of the main barrel, if so then I think you are going to have a hard time getting it off. Try a pair of tweezers with the blades spaced out over the barrel onto the barrel teeth and push down . The lid should be on top and hopefully pop up, gauge your pressure, if it feels like it's not going to give then you may damage the arbor or the spring. Good luck. If you're  anything like me, if a sign says do not enter then I'm going to look inside to see why I'm not supposed to enter 😄

  • Haha 1
Posted
3 hours ago, Neverenoughwatches said:

Try a pair of tweezers with the blades spaced out over the barrel onto the barrel teeth and push down.

Don't do this. That is the most common cause of missing teeth on a mainspring barrel.

If the cover is really stubborn, make a hole the same size as the outer diameter of the barrel in a scrap piece of aluminium or plastic. This will distribute the pressure over all the teeth when you push down on the arbor.

Many watches have barrels that say "DO NOT OPEN". But has that stopped any of us. 😬

Posted
9 hours ago, Neverenoughwatches said:

. I think I had one these a few months ago on a cheap lucerne. 

Might've been the same concept perhaps but the zodiac 88 isn't exactly a cheap watch

9 hours ago, Neverenoughwatches said:

Try a pair of tweezers with the blades spaced out over the barrel onto the barrel teeth and push down

This is an interesting Concept don't think I've ever used it before I wonder if we should worry about?

5 hours ago, HectorLooi said:

Don't do this. That is the most common cause of missing teeth on a mainspring barrel.

I'm not sure if this is the most common way of destroying the barrel. But I can't recommend the method either as I think it would destroy the barrel. Yes missing teeth are damaged teeth basically makes the barrel worthless and destroyed.

But don't worry it looks like I see one on eBay only $150 which seems like a bargain considering the probably rather hard to get.

It's amazing what you can find on the Internet if you look. Here's a nice article explains why disassembling the barrel is not in your best interest. A lot of modern barrels come with lids with no slots and they will come off in a variety of ways relatively safely without damaging the barrel but looks like from the description this barrel was not designed to come apart. Then of course if you somehow managed to get a part getting it back together might be a challenge.

https://www.vintagezodiacs.com/zforums/index.php?topic=2134.0

 

 

 

Posted
5 hours ago, HectorLooi said:

Don't do this. That is the most common cause of missing teeth on a mainspring barrel.

If the cover is really stubborn, make a hole the same size as the outer diameter of the barrel in a scrap piece of aluminium or plastic. This will distribute the pressure over all the teeth when you push down on the arbor.

Many watches have barrels that say "DO NOT OPEN". But has that stopped any of us. 😬

I do agree the method I sometimes  use can be risky. I saw it done many times on YouTube when I first started to learn, personally I've never had an issue doing it this way but it does cross my mind that sensitive parts of the barrel construction can get broken  given too much force, hence me saying to gauge the pressure you give it. Hector is quite right by suggesting a full even distribution over all of the teeth would be much better and less risky. As close as possible to the outer barrel wall staying away from the actual teeth as much as possible. A larger and deeper scrap barrel placed over the worked barrel would be a good choice of DIY tool. My bad sorry, tweezers over the side is a bit of a complacent attitude. I've just never had an issue that way but I'm very accurate and careful about the tweezer placement and if it's not popping off straight away then it's a rethink.

Posted
10 minutes ago, Neverenoughwatches said:

I saw it done many times on YouTube

One of the unfortunate problems of YouTube is there is no guarantee that someone making a video actually has any idea at all what they're doing even if they're doing it.

Posted
40 minutes ago, Neverenoughwatches said:

.My bad sorry, tweezers over the side is a bit of a complacent attitude.

It is. Spend few minutes and few bucks making a bored support as mentioned above. Even better, while at it make a few, strpped every half or 1mm and you'll be set for life. 

Posted
26 minutes ago, JohnR725 said:

One of the unfortunate problems of YouTube is there is no guarantee that someone making a video actually has any idea at all what they're doing even if they're doing it.

I totally agree but the youtubers i watched  are well respected  experienced amateur and professional watch repairers and all have many of subscribers, so that did give me confidence in that method. I think you will agree that the approach  taken to a particular  task is just as important  as the method used. A clumsy approach  to a safe method can cause damage and by the same token a calm mindful and focused approach to a more delicate method can consistently yield good results.

Posted
37 minutes ago, jdm said:

It is. Spend few minutes and few bucks making a bored support as mentioned above. Even better, while at it make a few, strpped every half or 1mm and you'll be set for life. 

Apologies  if I've set you back in any way. We all come by and have different methods and different  ways of how we approach  that method. This applies to all aspects of our lives. A saying that I  constantly  come across whenever I'm  researching anything that I'm doing and that is to find your own way of doing things that works for you, this I firmly stand by as we are all different, do things differently and approach things differently. On top of that we all have a different skill level and as that changes and evolves so can our approach. Not trying to justify how I do things only to explain why. Again apologies  if I've set you back at all. The Lucerne that I acquired was a fairly recent very poorly made example, probably not indicative of a vintage piece,watch companies constantly  change hands and a well made brand can have it's reputation  ruined very quickly, after all its just a name used by another company.But that's a very in depth subject for another day. That's not to say a similar barrel design would be used in something  of good quality. I would be interested  to see your Zodiac if you would mind posting a couple of pictures, I'm always on the lookout for a good brand to start working with. My favourites  at the moment  are Oris and Movado.

Posted

I think John is right in what he says  doing it and understanding the why's and wherefore's is another thing. If it says dont open ones logic says it was done for a reason, like sealed for life bearings. But if a replacement cannot be got or is too expensive then that is a good reason to try. but as advocated by jdm and HECTOR    make a jig to support the barrel and be very clear in what you are attempting to do and be careful in doing it, because if you ruin it you are back to square one or even worse as now it is destroyd.

  • Like 1
Posted

I've seen plenty of automatic barrels marked "do not open", so far the only one that was truly sealed was Zodiac. Total destruction of the lid on removal, ended up making a new lid. The one in the pic looks quite mangled, I'd try to find a new one.

Posted

hey guys.

Im still on that zodiac,I have 2 mainspring barrels just under 10mm (i think it mm) and its a auto mainspring i need to insert. The problem is the 2 tails on the end of the mainspring (they go to outer wall of the barrel) cannot be rolled tight enough to insert into the barrel to start inserting it all in. I have just broke one and now have 3 left .Any tips. I do the mainsprings by hand.

cheers

gary

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • You're asking a pretty broad question and you didn't specify the machine but yes it's simple especially if you have the right machine. The question has problems but I'll take it as it is. Is it really that simple yes especially if you have the right machine. So in the video below he's making a screw and yes it really is that simple but pay attention to the machine it is not simple at all probably wasn't cheap but it is small it will probably fit in your garage. Unfortunately wouldn't fit in my garage as it's far too cluttered up with things. In the video he talks about making a screw and pay attention to the machine. The machine has lots and lots and lots of cutters and lots of things to do lots of machining all-in-one machine conceivably one step after another all programmable. If you look at his channel lots of CNC's stuff and there are several other videos related to this machine. He goes to the factory where they talk about it and show all the other machines they make in Switzerland.  I did look up the specifications the machine I don't recall the price it's not going to cut wheels I think it has a maximum diameter around 11 mm basically it's really good for making small diameter watch parts. Then in one of the other videos he goes to a factory that used to make parts with waterpowered machinery been in business for 100 years and everything they now make is made with CNC machines including this one. What was interesting with the factory photo was that when they make some parts they can put them on a optical comparator comparator compares with whatever the reference is and the machine can be programmed to adjust its cutting to make sure everything is actually being made to specifications. Oh and then somewhere in all of this there was at least one picture of a balance staff can't have a CNC Swiss machine without making balance staffs.   It would be really nice if we had pictures of the machine. Then yes if you look at the page for wheel cutting you can enter parameters and it will generate a G code but he left out things? Notice he has a picture of a complete wheel but the G code isn't making a complete wheel it's only cutting the gear teeth I don't see whereas the program for crossing out the spokes? Typically when you see people cutting gears once the teeth are cut most the time the spokes are cut by hand. Occasionally someone will mill them out but typically not with the program which seems strange if you have CNC capability for instance one of my friends fill it used to design assembly line equipment or things to make things. So his hobby was to continue to make tools to make things like clocks. Very interesting and clever clocks but his true fund was making the machines to make the clocks. Then machine is not controlled by G code like we would typically find today as the stepping motor controller he has was made a long time ago and the individual controllers used a textbased program. So the company had a editor you could write a program to cause each the stepping motors to do something. So basically once you figure out how to cut a gear he would just change the parameters for different size gears so here's an example of a gear as you can see we have the teeth and the spokes. Then we have a picture the machine which sucks because it would've been so much nicer if I could've taken a picture when it was cutting a gears so we can see things better. Then yes there is a worm gear stepping motor indexing this is a mini lathe and the indexing is at the end of the lathe head hiding. The basic operation of this machine would be brass sheet not cut to a specific diameter size not even round mounted on the machine. Then it turns and a milling cutter will cut the diameter. Then the gear would be cut with a gear cutter. The same mill cutter for the diameter although conceivably change the size I don't know but basically the same milling for cutting the outer diameter would be used to cut the spokes. I really can't remember how he did the center hole but whatever it was was very precise.          
    • Yeah I know the site and the creator of it.  the two video clips are good examples of the quicker method and a full tear down.  the quick method will work in many cases. But not always and not for all the different movements.  I strongly suggest to not bend the four tabs as was done in the first clip.  Instead there are three tabs that insert into the top plate, Much saver way as to not break a tab.
    • I found a motor that is 3/4 hp and another that is 1.2hp. They come with speed controller. So I don’t think I would need a wiring diagram. But I sure appreciate you offering your help! Do you think 1.2 hp would be too much for a watchmaker’s lathe?
    • At the moment I have neither EDTA solution nor Evaporust, so I tried with a citric acid solution. This gave satisfying results for most of the parts, except for the ones that are really heavily corroded. I will see whether I can acquire one EDTA or Evaporust and try that next.
    • This guy (Minimachining) has a playlist of him setting up and using various attachments on his Sherline lathe.   I know nothing about CNC machines but had a question about making screws. Watchguy.uk has a section on his website where it allows you to enter parameters for screws and wheels and then 'generate code'. Is it as simple as that sounds, can you 'tell' the CNC machine to cut you a screw (or stem) by giving it the code for a particular screw or stem and it happily makes one for you?
×
×
  • Create New...