Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I have something similar.

Different brand, have used it for my motorbikes while racing for years and now for watch work.

There from the communist era, since they could build great fighter planes with tools like that it would also suit us 😉

 

  • Haha 1
Posted

Why don't you get a digital one. Mitutoyo is a good brand. Even some digital ones from China are pretty good. 

I'm also thinking of upgrading to a digital version. It's getting a little tiring on the eyes, squinting and counting the divisions on the micrometer scale.

Maybe I should get my eyes checked for astigmatism. Wait a minute.... I remove my glasses when I'm working.... so they are not being corrected for astigmatism.... No wonder the lines seem to be all over the place!

  • Haha 1
Posted
7 hours ago, Nucejoe said:

Hi ya all. 

 Shopping for a Micrometer I came accross this,  a PWD brand, made in Poland, is anybody here familiar with this brand? are they any good?  I don't think I need top quality ones really. 

https://esam.ir/zoomItemN.aspx?img=e17qs968_171417-22143243!1.jpg&slide=1&IDi=22135287

 Appreciate your help. 

I think it would do just fine.  Similar to this one which I use all the time even though I have a JKA and a digital Mutitoyo.

2022-02-14 20_45_59-Window.png

  • Thanks 1
Posted

As long as you zero it in properly without applying too much tension to the knurled knob, it should be fine. I remember that the analog Mitutoyos I used in my apprenticeship had a really good temperature range that they were accurate in. Maybe some of the cheaper ones don’t have that? Though these days it hardly matters as I am not trying to measure something when the temperature is zero. 

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Posted

Pretty much all mics (all that I know of) are calibrated at 20 degrees C. In the practical world, if the mic and part are the same temperature it doesn't really matter if you are a few or more degrees off, it's only when measuring really small numbers like microns or ten thousandths of an inch that it can be a concern, especially if the part is a different metal than the mic.

 

I like to check my mics to gages, and since 99% of what I measure is small round stuff I use small plug gages. If the mic is decent quality, you can usually just go with cleaning the face of the spindle and anvil and check that it zeros correctly. There is always an adjustment, but it usually requires a little pin spanner wrench to do. I can see in Joe's pic the wrench is there, so that's good.

 

I know a fellow who bought a set of Polish mics some years back, and ran them through the calibration lab at his work, and they checked out great.

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Posted

 I have an assortment of staffs,  perhaps two thousand or more , just mixed with no way to ID most of them other than to measure dimensions, so need an accurate Micrometer to measure pivot diameter with. 

You gentleman are generous so to prove that I am not really a bad guy either, I best start sending members some staffs. 

Just to be on the safe side, I did put in a bid for a Mityotyo.

Regards

 

Posted

I really strongly recommend not using a micrometer to measure balance staff pivots. By the time you can feel that the spindle and anvil are in contact, you have marked the pivot with a couple of tiny flat spots. I know some people say the spring loaded dial type tools like the JKA Feintaster won't mark pivots, but I don't trust that. For stuff under about 0.15mm you really need a jewel gage. I know they are hard to find and expensive, but those little flats will really mess up your timing.

  • Thanks 1
Posted

Hi Nickelsilver, many thanks for your advice. 

I got Jdrichard to blame for this, he said about using micrometer to measure staff, too bad he will never need any of my staffs. 

Regards

Posted
On 1/9/2019 at 6:19 AM, SockMonkey72 said:

Hello Looking for a Seitz Pivot Gauge

 

seitz gauge.jpg

Is this what you recommend.  

Have never come accross a new one for sale,   just used ones.

Posted
24 minutes ago, Nucejoe said:

Is this what you recommend.  

Have never come accross a new one for sale,   just used ones.

Yes. They can also be found in 0.005mm increments, which is nice. Also, the Seitz "balance pivot straightening tool", which isn't great for straightening pivots, has jewels from 0.07mm to 0.15mm in 0.0025mm increments- that's awesome for checking small balance pivots. Not cheap, but great.

  • Thanks 1
Posted
51 minutes ago, Nucejoe said:

Is this what you recommend.  

Have never come accross a new one for sale,   just used ones.

I have one of these.  Dad kept it in near mint condition--jewel 41 has a chip but is still functional.

  • Thanks 1
  • 2 years later...
Posted
On 2/15/2022 at 1:48 PM, nickelsilver said:

I know some people say the spring loaded dial type tools like the JKA Feintaster won't mark pivots, but I don't trust that.

I measured pivots down to 0.07mm in my JKA and looked long and hard at them in my stereo microscope at 40X magnification but couldn't see any deformations, dents, or damage. That doesn't mean there weren't any, but at least none that I could detect.

The Seitz jewel gauge, on the other hand, is perfectly safe and also makes it easier to select the right jewel holes as you can just try the pivot in the different jewel holes in the gauge until you find the perfect side shake. The only real disadvantage with the Seitz jewel gauge is the price. I believe I paid around $250 for mine and felt it to be insanely expensive at the time. Even so, the asking prices these days are twice that and more and they seem to become rarer by the day.

The JKA is a lot less expensive than the Seitz jewel gauge (nice!). However, I was under the impression that once you had measured the pivot in the JKA you could just add 0.02mm to the jewel hole, but that doesn't work (don't ask me how I know). I'm not sure, but I think adding about 25 % to 30 % of the pivot diameter to the jewel hole could be correct. For example, if the pivot diameter is 0.09 the jewel hole should be 0.12. If the pivot is 0.20mm the jewel hole should be 0.26. Again, I'm not sure my theory is correct so if anyone would like to comment on that it would be interesting. With the Seitz jewel gauge, there's no guessing!

I guess what I'm trying to say is that if the Seitz jewel gauge is out of reach, the JKA Feintaster could be an acceptable option.

Posted
4 hours ago, VWatchie said:

I guess what I'm trying to say is that if the Seitz jewel gauge is out of reach, the JKA Feintaster could be an acceptable option.

Happily, my dad bequeathed both to me.

Posted

The thing with indicator based "mics" is they won't reliably split hundredths as well as a screw mic simply due to their design (though good quality ones can repeat quite well). Also, on many mics, both handheld, table, or the JKA style, the faces of the spindle and anvil aren't particularly parallel. So, if you take a plug gage, and check in several places around the faces, you end up with different readings. This is actually the cheat to wring a good reading from one- check with a good plug gage approximately the diameter you will be measuring, at a given spot, and then check your part the same way.

 

I don't have a JKA but a colleague has one that appears to be a very recent model in new looking condition. Checking with a carbide CARY 0.51mm plug gage, depending on where I checked on the faces it ranged from spot-on, to a few microns under, to almost a whole 0.01mm over. My screw mic of similar design was much closer, spot-on overall, with it reading a few microns under at the very edges of the upper part of the faces.

 

It's a rather involved process to lap these faces correctly; it's really easy to end up with convex faces, so not recommended if you aren't used to it.

 

9 hours ago, VWatchie said:

I measured pivots down to 0.07mm in my JKA and looked long and hard at them in my stereo microscope at 40X magnification but couldn't see any deformations, dents, or damage. That doesn't mean there weren't any, but at least none that I could detect.

 

The JKA is a lot less expensive than the Seitz jewel gauge (nice!). However, I was under the impression that once you had measured the pivot in the JKA you could just add 0.02mm to the jewel hole, but that doesn't work (don't ask me how I know). I'm not sure, but I think adding about 25 % to 30 % of the pivot diameter to the jewel hole could be correct. For example, if the pivot diameter is 0.09 the jewel hole should be 0.12. If the pivot is 0.20mm the jewel hole should be 0.26. Again, I'm not sure my theory is correct so if anyone would like to comment on that it would be interesting. With the Seitz jewel gauge, there's no guessing!

 

I'd say it's tricky to have a hard rule on pivot to jewel clearance. In small sizes, 10% would work. That would mean a 0.10 pivot in a 0.11 jewel. But for a center wheel with a 0.80 pivot 0.08mm would be way too much. 0.02 would be fine. So the clearances become larger as the size gets smaller- this is one reason why movements tend to perform less well as the size goes down.

  • Like 3
Posted (edited)
4 hours ago, nickelsilver said:

I'd say it's tricky to have a hard rule on pivot to jewel clearance. In small sizes, 10% would work. That would mean a 0.10 pivot in a 0.11 jewel. But for a center wheel with a 0.80 pivot 0.08mm would be way too much. 0.02 would be fine. So the clearances become larger as the size gets smaller- this is one reason why movements tend to perform less well as the size goes down.

Thanks for the info it makes a lot of sense! I figured out why I thought the clearance had to be a lot more. The train wheel bridge on the movement I'm currently working on doesn't fit very well on the main plate. It needs to be pushed down on one side with force (I've tried to lower the bridge down evenly but no matter how I try it refuses). To make sure I don't snap the pivots while forcing the bridge down I need to tilt the bridge slightly towards the pivots so that the pivots slightly reach into the jewel holes. Of course, to get the pivots into the jewel holes while the bridge is tilted the diameter of the holes needs to be larger than when the bridge is in its fixed position.

That bridge or the main plate likely has to be adjusted but I will have to have a closer look and get back to it perhaps in a new thread with pictures as I have no idea how that adjustment could or should be accomplished. BTW, it is the same movement as in the "Serviced ETA 2763 having erratic rate and amplitude" thread. As I took it apart I discovered that the escape wheel jewel hole in the bridge was way too large. When pushing the intermediate wheel (driven by the barrel) back and forth the escape wheel pivot jumped like crazy in the hole. When pushing the intermediate wheel in a single direction with constant speed the pivot would keep jumping vibrating like crazy. Don't know why I missed this the first time around. Perhaps I was trusting "Swiss quality" too much (I doubt it would have passed me by if it was a Russian movement). Perhaps someone fitted a jewel with a too-large hole because of the faulty bridge, and that is perhaps the main reason for the erratic rate and amplitude, or what do you think? 

Edited by VWatchie
Posted
21 hours ago, VWatchie said:

That bridge or the main plate likely has to be adjusted but I will have to have a closer look and get back to it

Having a close look at the two posts underneath the train wheel bridge the post on the side that needed to be pushed down with force was slightly taller than the other. It also lacked a chamfer. Not completely, but a lot less defined than in the other post.

To fix this I taped (Kapton tape) around the post and then carefully shaped it with the file part of my Vallorbe burnisher making it slightly shorter and enlarging the chamfer but not touching its diameter. Now when I press it down it feels the way I'm used to. That is, when applying pressure on top of the posts the bridge slides into the main plate with a slight resistance.

I realize it's a funny place to write about this in a thread about micrometres, but as is so often the case one thing leads to another. Anyway, apologies about that.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • This was what I was afraid of. The movement is not one of the generic black square modules. Remove the movement from the clock and try prying it open very carefully, without breaking the plastic tabs. The plastic might be brittle from age. Clean the wheels and check the battery contacts for corrosion. Check the PCB for bad solder joints. Take plenty of photos along the way.
    • One of the problems with trying to Photograph Phils things are that his enjoyment was building these things so they tended to E falls on what will see if I can find some earlier pictures or any pictures I wasn't even sure because I was looking for that specific picture for somebody else and even it got the last version and that would have been the last version. You will note that he put the indexing on something that he could unscrew it or whatever and it can slide back out of the way so the rest of the lathe can be used as a lathe. With the lathe cut are actually coming down from the top I was there once where he demonstrated how to cut a pivot with the setup it was really beautiful. Older set up if I remember it's not a worm gear assembly in the thing in between the stepping motor and the holding block I believe this particular one was like a 100 to 1 gear ratio. Earlier version with watchmaker's lathe. Even looks like he is the watchmakers bed and then switch to something he made. Then I do have other pictures and things of the rotary stage in use. In the raw so if you tube videos here is an example of one were somebody's mounting a three jaw chuck. At one time there were available on eBay they were not cheap but if you're patient like I was I found one cheap on eBay. After you watch the video it look at his other videos he is a whole bunch of other examples of the same rotary stage. That I do know there are other pictures examples and possibly videos you just have to track them down. One of the minor issues of finding this particular tech sheet for the unit is I believe it was a custom manufacturer and the company change their name but I remember the new name here's a link to the company https://www.ondrivesus.com/rino-mechanical-components                
    • Escapement adjusting always interesting and depending upon the reference always confusing. Okay maybe it's not always confusing but it does lead to confusion. I have a PDF below it's actually a whole bunch of separate stuff including a hand out that came from a lecture that's on you tube. Then from that we get this image Consequences of doing things especially if you do things out of order or you do things for the wrong reason. Oh and even if the watches working I made the mistake one so showing my boss how tweaking the banking pins on a full plate on the timing machine made the amplitude get better and now he thinks that's what they're for and I don't think a fully grasped exactly what horn clearance means. Consequence of doing things. Notice what it says about opening and closing the banking pins and total lock? So yes I've had that on a full plate where it won't unlock at all and that's the banking pins or a combination of things basically. So banking pins unfortunately get moved. One of the ways to tell if it's been moved is the look straight down at the end of the fork with the balance wheel removed. Power on the fork push at the one side look at it push it to the other side also look at it and compare anything with the center reference the balance jewel and see if both sides of the same. No guarantee after the same there in the right place but at least are the same typically when people play with things one side will be way off from the other because they had no idea what they were doing at all because of course it's a full plate and you really have to paying attention and even then there's still hard to do. Then the other thing that comes up like it shows below is people often adjust the banking pins to do all those other things as opposed to horn clearance which is all that it's therefore and maybe bonus Guard pin clearance although you're supposed to deal with the guard pin is a separate thing like single roller gets bent in Or out or sometimes physically gets moved in and out. Some full plates older escapement's typically pallet forks held together with screws and you can actually unscrew and move the entire assembly in Or out more complications to deal with.     Escapement handout wostep nscc.pdf
    • If he was much younger and some sort of sports player it wouldn't be a problem. They would be in there and doing surgery and he'd be back on the field in no time. Unfortunately when you get older little things are bad and big things can be really bad so not good at all.
    • Where I work everything incoming watches whatever detailed descriptions are taken entered into a computer program and photograph of each item. Then ideally although it depends on who's doing the paperwork detailed descriptions can be quite good other times there lacking. Like I really like it with pocket watches if they would record the serial number it avoids confusion later on. Then when watch repairs are completed that is also entered in. It's one of the amusements I learned when I was in school instructor had a shop and commented about the important aspect of keeping detailed records of repairs. Because oftentimes a customer who got a new crystal will come back later on when the watch doesn't work and expect you to fix the entire watch for free. Then you can remind them that they just got a crystal. Strangely enough that keeps coming up or occasionally comes up where I work now. One of the problems of using the service marks on the case is that in the case of pocket watches oftentimes that's not the original case. Then case marks? What I was doing warranty work for a company I used to describe a code number in the back of the case and it would tell me the next time I see the watch that basically what I did I made no attempt at keeping track of customers because we had literally thousands of them I think they sold 30,000 of these watches and they would come back by the hundreds because they had a lifetime warranty. Yes that's a story all of itself but I would put a code number that would reference what was done to the watch the last time and think I had a date in there somehow so it did tell a story if you knew the code. Another shop I once worked out the number would reference the page in the book. So other than knowing we had been in there you would have no idea what happened because you have to go look at the page in the book to see what happened. Then the problem of how you examine a watch you should examine the watch in detail every single time to avoid complications. Although on vintage watches and this is a of amusement I have at work when people ask something and I say of the watches done when it leaves. This is because on vintage oftentimes problems won't show up until the watches much farther into the repair like it's now running and you discover things that you can't discover before because it wasn't running to discover them that also become sometimes difficult to have exact rigid prices are estimates of repairs or in the case of a pocket watch you may not find out if a casing problem to later on when you case it up in the watches running. I was just thinking for all those people that would like to leave a mark maybe you should learn to do what some of the past watchmakers did? Leave a mark but leave it in such a way that no one will ever find it? Typically not done for repair purposes but done for other reasons like identifying it's legit. I have a friend with a Gruen watch and one of the Roman numbers the bottom line that just looks like a line under extreme magnification actually says Gruen watch company or something equivalent. So here's a link showing how to mark your watch without being seen although that's not the actual title. So if you can learn micro engraving you can engrave the watch someplace probably just about any place you just have to remember where you put it. https://cnaluxury.channelnewsasia.com/obsessions/how-to-prove-if-watches-are-authentic-secret-signatures-182516  
×
×
  • Create New...