Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Has anyone made a roller table for a pocket watch. Upon punching out a roller table, it cracked….not a good day. I am planing on making one out of brass or steel. Need some advice here as I have never done this job before on a lathe.

AE4D5F16-2DF4-49ED-9F89-EE75770EA0CA.jpeg

Posted
On 1/25/2022 at 3:27 AM, jdrichard said:

Upon punching out a roller table,

Just for clarification it cracked when you removed it?

Usually they end up cracked when people put them on and don't pay attention to the staffing size. In other words the new staff is supposed to be correct they don't waste their time measuring to see of it actually agrees with the old and they don't worry about cracking things. The end up with the roller table cracked and sometimes the hairspring collet.

The vintage ones like this are usually made out of steel but you can get a magnet to verify. I'm pretty sure all the new ones in modern watches are made out of brass.

Yours looks pretty simple? I assume there's a separate safety roller because I don't see the cutout next to the roller jewel? Even though the original is made out of steel There is no reason you couldn't make one out of brass.   You do have to carefully get the distances right in other words from the center of the staff were the roller jewel is needs to be reasonably close it fits in the fork properly.

Then this kind of thing is more of watch manufacturing. You probably look in the book like Daniels wrote on watchmaking I'm sure he would probably tell how to make a roller table. Along with the entire rest of the watch. I know I've seen somewhere where someone talked how to make the single roller but to remember where I saw that whatever is going to be impossible so I know it's out there but this looks reasonably simple compared to a lot of other stuff you might have to make.

  • Like 2
Posted

 How would you go about setting the jewel so its curved side correctly faces the fork ?    wouldn't it affect the impulse and lift angle if set incrrect? 

The distance( radius) where the flat side of jewel is to be positioned  can be marked when you have the workpiece on lathe. I think this flat side is to simplify setting the jewel . 

 

 

Posted
10 minutes ago, Nucejoe said:

How would you go about setting the jewel so its curved side correctly faces the fork ?

Before they figured out how to drill half round holes the old ones used to be round. So typically on the old single roller table tables it's a pain in the something to get the jewel Where it is supposed to be. So then you have the problem of making sure it straight and parallel and not leaning and rotated so it's facing exactly were supposed to be. Nice when they figured out how to get away from a round hole.

  • Thanks 1
Posted

One of the interesting thing is about the Internet is you're probably not the first one to do this. This link somebody's making a fancy roller table it's not even round. Then he didn't make the hole with the drill you will note there usually punched out conveniently skims over that but he does mention that

https://www.historictimekeepers.com/Vacheron Roller Table.htm

I suppose you might get lucky with this assortment. Unless of course you already have an assortment of broken watches miscellaneous balance wheels and so forth they really come in handy when you're working on pocket watches for stealing parts from

https://www.jewelerssupplies.com/hamilton-illinois-18s-0s-pocket-watch-roller-table-assortment-03-5062-959.002.0001.html

 

 

  • Like 1
Posted

  Hi John,

 

2 hours ago, JohnR725 said:

skims over that but he does mention that.

Yes he does, unfortunately

  I expect a slugish running oscikator if impulse jewel is incorrectly faces the fork. 

 The question remains, how to set the impulse jewel so its flat side is prependicukare to the radius paasing through that sides( flat) midpoint. Perhaps a special tool is needed.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Posted
13 hours ago, JohnR725 said:

Just for clarification it cracked when you removed it?

Usually they end up cracked when people put them on and don't pay attention to the staffing size. In other words the new staff is supposed to be correct they don't waste their time measuring to see of it actually agrees with the old and they don't worry about cracking things. The end up with the roller table cracked and sometimes the hairspring collet.

The vintage ones like this are usually made out of steel but you can get a magnet to verify. I'm pretty sure all the new ones in modern watches are made out of brass.

Yours looks pretty simple? I assume there's a separate safety roller because I don't see the cutout next to the roller jewel? Even though the original is made out of steel There is no reason you couldn't make one out of brass.   You do have to carefully get the distances right in other words from the center of the staff were the roller jewel is needs to be reasonably close it fits in the fork properly.

Then this kind of thing is more of watch manufacturing. You probably look in the book like Daniels wrote on watchmaking I'm sure he would probably tell how to make a roller table. Along with the entire rest of the watch. I know I've seen somewhere where someone talked how to make the single roller but to remember where I saw that whatever is going to be impossible so I know it's out there but this looks reasonably simple compared to a lot of other stuff you might have to make.

It’s a single roller so should be easier. I think the hardest part will be drilling the hole to the correct diameter. I may need to get it close and then taper the staff as I fit the table. There was a very small notch in front of the jewel.  I could use a jeweling reamer to finalize the hole as I test fit.

Posted
3 hours ago, Nucejoe said:

 How would you go about setting the jewel so its curved side correctly faces the fork ?    wouldn't it affect the impulse and lift angle if set incrrect? 

The distance( radius) where the flat side of jewel is to be positioned  can be marked when you have the workpiece on lathe. I think this flat side is to simplify setting the jewel . 

 

 

This could be the toughest job yet. Setting the jewel means drilling a very small hole and somehow jigging it up so the square side is forward.

Posted
1 minute ago, jdrichard said:

This could be the toughest job yet. Setting the jewel means drilling a very small hole and somehow jigging it up so the square side is forward.

Hi Jd.

I bet there is a special tool for this task.

Regs

  • Like 1
Posted
3 hours ago, JohnR725 said:

One of the interesting thing is about the Internet is you're probably not the first one to do this. This link somebody's making a fancy roller table it's not even round. Then he didn't make the hole with the drill you will note there usually punched out conveniently skims over that but he does mention that

https://www.historictimekeepers.com/Vacheron Roller Table.htm

I suppose you might get lucky with this assortment. Unless of course you already have an assortment of broken watches miscellaneous balance wheels and so forth they really come in handy when you're working on pocket watches for stealing parts from

https://www.jewelerssupplies.com/hamilton-illinois-18s-0s-pocket-watch-roller-table-assortment-03-5062-959.002.0001.html

 

 

Interesting technique belittling not well described. First, why did his table not need to be round? Second, how did he “punch” the hole for the impulse jewel. Third. How did he make the hole size exact.  Btw, this company asked it I was interested in working for them:)

Posted
6 minutes ago, Nucejoe said:

Hi Jd.

I bet there is a special tool for this task.

Regs

You are likely correct. It would be a jig to hold everything in place while you heat up the shellac.

Posted
46 minutes ago, Nucejoe said:

The question remains, how to set the impulse jewel so its flat side is prependicukare to the radius paasing through that sides( flat) midpoint. Perhaps a special tool is needed.

You will drill a smaller hole and punch out the rest with a punch that has the same profile as the jewel (punch must be made).

Frank

  • Thanks 1
Posted

For a single roller like this, Daniels describes a method that doesn't require a shaped punch. Turn and drill the center hole the table, part off. Turn and file a pin to the shape of the roller jewel, harden and temper. Drill the roller table for the full diameter of the roller jewel. Then the trick(y) part, holding the table firmly in a smooth jaw vice, place the steel pin in the hole for the roller jewel, and place a piece of blue steel of a correct diameter on the edge where the crescent should be formed, and give it a blow with a hammer. This will form the crescent, and close the hole around the shaped pin. I did it once many years ago and it did work. 

 

Drilling undersize and punching does work, but in my experience a simple shaped punch doesn't work nearly as well as a stepped punch, which can be tedious to make at this size if you aren't accustomed to it. However, since the thickness of the table is roughly the same as the hole diameter on a part like this a simple punch will work, and any distortion can be cleaned up on graded abrasive paper or a fine diamond hone (or any fine stone).

  • Thanks 1
Posted
1 hour ago, nickelsilver said:

For a single roller like this, Daniels describes a method that doesn't require a shaped punch. Turn and drill the center hole the table, part off. Turn and file a pin to the shape of the roller jewel, harden and temper. Drill the roller table for the full diameter of the roller jewel. Then the trick(y) part, holding the table firmly in a smooth jaw vice, place the steel pin in the hole for the roller jewel, and place a piece of blue steel of a correct diameter on the edge where the crescent should be formed, and give it a blow with a hammer. This will form the crescent, and close the hole around the shaped pin. I did it once many years ago and it did work. 

 

Drilling undersize and punching does work, but in my experience a simple shaped punch doesn't work nearly as well as a stepped punch, which can be tedious to make at this size if you aren't accustomed to it. However, since the thickness of the table is roughly the same as the hole diameter on a part like this a simple punch will work, and any distortion can be cleaned up on graded abrasive paper or a fine diamond hone (or any fine stone).

So steel on steel with the pallet fork would not be an issue?

Posted
1 hour ago, nickelsilver said:

For a single roller like this, Daniels describes a method that doesn't require a shaped punch.

Great tip that serves two tasks at the same blow.

I had to make a double roller once and used the mentioned punch.

Frank

Posted

 Easy to think of ways to make a roller table, without the need to make a tool with profile of the jewel.

 Invisige two coins glued together.   got the idea?   so 

1- Turn a table of same OD as the broken one, go ahead drill its center hole as well plus a hole for the jewel ( about the same or larger diameter ) 

2-Heat the shellac to push the jewel half way sticking out the other side,   you then have the jewel sticking out of both sides. 

3-Insert the protion of the jewel thats sticking out into the hole you drilled ( on the table you made)

4-Shellac the jewel to the roller you made.

5- Heat the shellac on the broken table to take the broken table out of your hair. 

This will  hold the jewel in best practical coordinate for you to shellac. I think. 

 

 

Posted (edited)
2 hours ago, jdrichard said:

So steel on steel with the pallet fork would not be an issue?

No no no- the steel pin goes in the hole, then the hole gets crushed by whacking a bar or punch with the right radius to form the crescent, which forms the crescent and closes the hole around the pin. Now you have a hole the correct shape for the jewel--- the pin is pulled out, roller cleaned up (there will be burrs and some deformation), and ideally hardened and tempered, polished, then the roller jewel gets fitted.

 

Here's an image from Gazeley's Watch and Clock Making and Repairing that's clearer than the Daniels image (there's a lot in Daniels' book that is also in the much older Gazeley...).

 

 

roller.jpg

Edited by nickelsilver
  • Like 3
Posted
6 hours ago, nickelsilver said:

Here's an image from Gazeley's Watch and Clock Making and Repairing that's clearer than the Daniels image (there's a lot in Daniels' book that is also in the much older Gazeley...).

I suspected that that's where I saw that procedure because I knew I had seen it before.

But a lot of American pocket watches had round holes it really isn't an issue. A lot of American pocket watches have holes that are bigger than I would like to have its still not an issue it's just a pain you put the roller jewel in you put the shellac on you warm it up and then you very carefully get it all in alignment where it's supposed to be it can be done it's not as nice as if you have a hold the exact right size but it can be done you don't need a special tool you just did a little warm shellac and some tweezers and a lot of patience

Then while I said you don't need a special tool I assume that you do know that there is a tool to hold the roller table either where it's on the staff or it's off? I'll get a picture of that just so were all on the same page these I just assume that everyone knew that this tool exists but if you're modern watch repair why would you know such a thing.

Then because they were all in the same lecture I snipped out a few more images of roller jewel things. Even though they don't show a round jewel they did exist at one time.

That are variety of tools used to do the task the one that's labeled figure 12 is the most common one that's the most common tool available. It becomes an interesting procedure of holding the tool putting it in alcohol lamp melting the shellac hopefully not too much then holding on to the tool not touching anything because it's hot and carefully manipulating roller jewel.

Then found another image of what I call the conventional tool the advertising it can also be used to hold pallet forks.

Then I do know that there are other tools out there because I've seen one that holds the roller jewel nice and secure you lay the table on top of it then you keep that up either with the shellac reported after it's warm but it holds the jewel nice and straight get the table exactly where you want and then you go a put it back on the watch as opposed to doing it on the watch where things get really complicated.

roller jewel most common tool.JPG

roller jewel tools number two.JPG

roller jewel tools.JPG

roller jewel shapes.JPG

Pallet warmer roller watch.jpg

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 1
Posted
12 hours ago, JohnR725 said:

I suspected that that's where I saw that procedure because I knew I had seen it before.

But a lot of American pocket watches had round holes it really isn't an issue. A lot of American pocket watches have holes that are bigger than I would like to have its still not an issue it's just a pain you put the roller jewel in you put the shellac on you warm it up and then you very carefully get it all in alignment where it's supposed to be it can be done it's not as nice as if you have a hold the exact right size but it can be done you don't need a special tool you just did a little warm shellac and some tweezers and a lot of patience

Then while I said you don't need a special tool I assume that you do know that there is a tool to hold the roller table either where it's on the staff or it's off? I'll get a picture of that just so were all on the same page these I just assume that everyone knew that this tool exists but if you're modern watch repair why would you know such a thing.

Then because they were all in the same lecture I snipped out a few more images of roller jewel things. Even though they don't show a round jewel they did exist at one time.

That are variety of tools used to do the task the one that's labeled figure 12 is the most common one that's the most common tool available. It becomes an interesting procedure of holding the tool putting it in alcohol lamp melting the shellac hopefully not too much then holding on to the tool not touching anything because it's hot and carefully manipulating roller jewel.

Then found another image of what I call the conventional tool the advertising it can also be used to hold pallet forks.

Then I do know that there are other tools out there because I've seen one that holds the roller jewel nice and secure you lay the table on top of it then you keep that up either with the shellac reported after it's warm but it holds the jewel nice and straight get the table exactly where you want and then you go a put it back on the watch as opposed to doing it on the watch where things get really complicated.

roller jewel most common tool.JPG

roller jewel tools number two.JPG

roller jewel tools.JPG

roller jewel shapes.JPG

Pallet warmer roller watch.jpg

Thank you. I do have all these tools and have made many videos on how to use them to replace or tighten the camera mousse jewel. It’s making the table that will be fun. I also have the Danials book that has a write up on how to make a roller table, but there a few steps left out I feel.

Posted
19 hours ago, nickelsilver said:

No no no- the steel pin goes in the hole, then the hole gets crushed by whacking a bar or punch with the right radius to form the crescent, which forms the crescent and closes the hole around the pin. Now you have a hole the correct shape for the jewel--- the pin is pulled out, roller cleaned up (there will be burrs and some deformation), and ideally hardened and tempered, polished, then the roller jewel gets fitted.

 

Here's an image from Gazeley's Watch and Clock Making and Repairing that's clearer than the Daniels image (there's a lot in Daniels' book that is also in the much older Gazeley...).

 

 

roller.jpg

A ha!  I just bought the book as well. Now I must have all the books on watchmaking:). Thanks, I shall try this weekend 

Posted
26 minutes ago, jdrichard said:

A ha!  I just bought the book as well. Now I must have all the books on watchmaking:). Thanks, I shall try this weekend 

It's really great book!

  • Like 1
  • 4 weeks later...
Posted

Dragging up an old thread but how did you get on?

If you have deep pockets Archie B Perkins has a whole chapter in Volume II of Antique Watch Restoration on how to do this and even how to make different shaped roller jewels from round jewel stock.

His books go into great detail on how to make all sorts of parts for antique watches.

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Do you have the service manual for 3135 as it would explain the procedure then in the absence of that the current procedure for modern mainsprings would be breaking grease on the outer wall as it's an automatic watch. The mainsprings are considered prelubricated no lubrication is required. Then the arbor is lubricated with a suitable lubrication. Typically the only time you see well I haven't ever seen anything quite like that Rolex but Seiko watches often the barrel is filled with some sort of I believe graphite-based lubricant. Or if too much breaking grease was applied in it leaks out but that would be a heck of a lot of breaking grease. I wonder if the black would be molybdenum disulfide? There is a variation of 8200 Quite remember the number were a little bit of molybdenum disulfide Which is a really nice high-pressure powder is mixed in with the eighth 200 and maybe they applied a heaping quantity of that?
    • The watch is from 1990 and was serviced just once around 20 years ago. No idea if the mainspring barrel was ever opened or changed before now.
    • Interesting but I think we have a problem here? We probably need to split hairs on a definition problem. For instance take a real Rolex movement put it in a real Rolex case but not the one it came in take a real dial real hands and make up a watch that is 100% real and what exactly is this? If you send your Rolex in for servicing and anything's been changed at all from what it was when it left the factory Rolex will be unhappy and remove all offending components. This does become a problem of people changing things because they think it's their watch and they want to have a different dial Lord diamonds the bezel or whatever words Rolex sees all of this as evil and bad as far as a Intel Rolex only things the watch is legit if everything is exactly what it was when it left the factory and nothing's been changed including the stem everything asked me Rolex original or their very unhappy about its existence. Then you think about a fake watch what is its real purpose? Well its real purpose is to make money for somebody and fool the customer. So all the watch has to do is look pleasant on the outside and inside can be anything. Typically nobody's going to see inside. So typically anything that's not legit counterfeit movement etc. why would someone spend so much time and effort making it look just like a real Rolex when there's no need to? Unless of course you have one or two movements to impress somebody with this is what's inside your watch but even that is problematic Now we don't end up with I've interesting problem that troubles me where I work. The owner will offend a cage your watch by looking at it carefully with a microscope the timing machine etc. and he will point out all the things that he feels are not appropriate correct or whatever for your watch. But in my example above of mixing and matching legitimate Rolex parts he wouldn't necessarily be able to tell. The problem I have with this is it often times things like his claim to telling a counterfeit is look at the second hand the quality of the secondhand is not as nice as a legitimate one. But maybe somebody replaced a second hand on a real Rolex. Or the other day at work I don't know what it was in before but there was a really pretty movement transparent back and they decided it was fake because of? Now I didn't think it was fake I took one look was beautifully manufactured but they had a reason What bothers me with counterfeit Rolex is or anything counterfeit watch related it is reminding me of a witchhunt. The early days of witch hunting how can we tell a which Manon which? That makes me wonder how many super fakes are really fake at all it's basically somebody deciding it's a fake based upon inappropriate assumptions. Like the secondhand is been changed or the watch was worked on the screws are perfect or other things. Other minor problems with super fakes for instance I have a long story the not going to tell the short version is I found the website once where they claim to be counterfeiting Rolex watches. They even had a picture to prove their counterfeit watch the problem with pictures online how do we know it's really a counterfeit watch and not a real Rolex watch that you're telling us is counterfeit. Oh and they had testimonials from all kinds of people who bought their watches and were very happy with the service of course the problem with the watch is you don't know what's inside it unless you take the back off and just because somebody shows a picture online and says this is their super fake maybe it really isn't a super fake they be there just trying to say that. We end up with a interesting problem of manufacturing a watch. Does Rolex actually make every single part found in their watch? Then the year 2004's basically irrelevant. This is because initially Rolex buys stock in the company and they manufacture Rolex watches. I'm assuming over time Rolex will acquire more stock and only in 2004 do they get the whole company. But the company itself hasn't really changed other than the name on the front of the building. The real question is did they really make every single component found in the Rolex watch from the beginning of time until end of the time? A lot of the components found in a watch would be extremely specialized did they make their own jewels or their own mainsprings for instance? But that is looking at the article they employ a heck of a lot of people now I would guess now that Rolex probably does make everything in-house. Especially when they have nifty CNC equipment like for making screws were he could make a huge batch of one type it instantly switch to another type where before he needed specialized machines for one machine for one screw now manufacturing all kinds of stuff in-house becomes very simple. But still is possible that in the early days they might have outsourced something may be perhaps. But conceivably we do have minor changes in thing is due to how things have been made over time which can lead to confusions over whether this is legit or not when it may be as a change of manufacturing methods oh and regarding the screws found in your Rolex watch? In about mid-80s I went to a school reunion in Switzerland. One of things we could do was visit a factory and I picked Rolex because I wanted to see the mass production making of Rolex watches. Which is very disappointed I did not get the sea at all because didn't see them making Rolex watches in their Geneva headquarters even though the building is really fake? So what did we get to see well after sales service because after all were watchmakers we should see that. Did learn something interesting about Rolex screws if your watch was sent to Rolex the screws that come back are not the ones that went there. As they are using powered screwdrivers they don't want to risk breaking heads off and they will replace the screws of every single watch. The other one of interest was suppose there's a scratch and you can see the brass? No problem they have a solution that basically electoral plates without electricity so the scratch goes away. The research Department was quite boring and didn't look like anyone was ever there. Then it was too long ago to remember all the details other than I was disappointed I want to see manufacturing.   Yes the joys of artificial intelligence that is more like a trained monkey that's there to please you.
    • Hey everybody! I just registered to WRT. I found this forum searching for informations about ELMA watch cleaning machines (will get one ELMA tomorrow ✌️). I'm new in watch repair, collecting watch repair tools to fill up my work space 😎.   Greetings from Vienna Michael
×
×
  • Create New...