Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I don't know if this is a good place for this question or not. If you know of a better place, please direct me...

I acquired what was sold as a Rolex Datejust Oyster Perpetual (36mm). It looks like someone dug it up from a landfill, so it isn't in the best of shape. Surprisingly, I wound it and it is running. I haven't put it on the timegrapher yet.

I'm just starting out with watch repair and restoration, and the price I got was worth the gamble.

Now, how do I determine if it is real? I haven't opened it yet because it didn't open with the rubber ball method and I don't have any Rolex-specific tools. I will likely superglue a nut to the case back. I've had success with this on another watch.

From the case alone, there are a few red flags:

1. The bezel appears to have been a plated base metal, and the plating is completely gone. Did Rolex use plating on their cases?

2. The case shows places where it was worn so much there is base metal showing through. Same question as #1.

3. The bracelet has a lot of corrosion (especially on the bottom) and apparently used to be two-toned but barely is anymore. Again, did Rolex sell plated bracelets?

4. There appears to be a glob of glue on the Rolex crown at 12:00 on the dial, although that could have been a poor attempt at a DIY project.

5. One index has come off and is floating around inside.

I can supply photos, and in a couple of days I should have the case back off so I can see the movement. But I wanted to see if we already know enough to call this a fake. Obviously, I hope I didn't lose money, but it wasn't much, so I won't be heartbroken.

 

Thanks all!

 

 

 

 

Posted
51 minutes ago, FreelanceAstronaut said:

But I wanted to see if we already know enough to call this a fake.

I think this kind of discussion can be meaningful only with pictures posted, no matter how much of an eyesore these can be. It seems anyway as if you know already what's the predictable outcome.

 

51 minutes ago, FreelanceAstronaut said:

Obviously, I hope I didn't lose money, but it wasn't much, so I won't be heartbroken

If not much is like Euro 150 or less, be reassured that you have a fake, because nobody sells a genuine big brand watch for that little (or even 5 times as much), too good to be true etc. BTW in my opinion even Euro 10 is too much for a fake watch, and there are better ways to spend money for learning watch repair.

And if you paid more than that, and bought without giving proven authenticity any importance then your indeed is a costly and risky gambling, you may as well go play the casino where odds would be more in your favor.

 

Posted
37 minutes ago, FreelanceAstronaut said:

The case shows places where it was worn so much there is base metal showing through. Same question as #1.

I'm pretty sure the usp for rolex is that they use a high grade of stainless steel for their cases so it doesn't sound good... add some pictures. 

Posted

I am afraid I can only agree with the previous comments, But pictures of the case/bracelet and movement would be appreciated by members  for their confirmation one way or another.      cheers.

Posted

Here are the photos. I'm convinced it is fake now. But I got this with other watches. I like a couple of the others, although one of them was an old Hamilton and when I noticed the lume I got out my geiger counter and sure enough... I'm not sure what I'll do with that one.

I'll glue a nut to it tonight and let the glue cure for 24 hours and then we can see what's inside.

M1030681.jpg

M1030678.jpg

M1030679.jpg

M1030683.jpg

M1030680.jpg

M1030683-2.jpg

M1030684.jpg

  • Sad 1
Posted
5 minutes ago, FreelanceAstronaut said:

You wouldn't open the watch? Why not?

Out of concern for your safety and good health,,,,          disappointment,,,    heartattack,,,.        LOL 

 

 

  • Like 2
Posted

I do not know how old the Datejust is.  Does anyone here know if Rolex ever used plated brass for their cases in the past, before going with stainless steel.  I haven't yet heard that they did so, but I have only ever seen more modern Rolexes.  I saw the wear, and the brassing on the case and became apprehensive.  Looking further made me doubt even more.
If I had to guess, I would call it fake.  

Posted
11 minutes ago, KarlvonKoln said:

I do not know how old the Datejust is.  Does anyone here know if Rolex ever used plated brass for their cases in the past, before going with stainless steel.  I haven't yet heard that they did so, but I have only ever seen more modern Rolexes.  I saw the wear, and the brassing on the case and became apprehensive.  Looking further made me doubt even more.
If I had to guess, I would call it fake.  

This is a fake for sure and a cheap one.

 Naturally we know the stuff thats marketted in our locality, my neck of the woods is filled with such fakes, whereas I have never seen an actual Patek phillipe. 

Posted (edited)
On 1/22/2022 at 6:16 PM, FreelanceAstronaut said:

You are correct! It actually is a snap on back. They weren't even trying on the movement!

 

M1030687.jpg

Yep, I thought that's what we would see.  Cheap, fragile, anonymous Chinese automatic.  I've seen a few of those.  And a couple times it made for an awkward and uncomfortable situation, as the owner had been assuming for some time that he had the genuine article.  There's no easy way to tell someone their treasured watch is a fake, and that parts would be nearly impossible to come by if anything broke. Sometimes, a bargain is too "good" to be true.
Edit: WAIT A MINUTE!  THIS ONE *IS* MARKED!
H&L Inc.  I may have to see if I can find out more about that.  This is the first one I've seen with any marking of any kind.  How did I miss that before?  Thanks for posting this picture!

Edited by KarlvonKoln
discovery
Posted
On 1/26/2022 at 11:28 PM, TimpanogosSlim said:

It's good to have some worthless movements for practice

Yes, this is true.  I have a couple that I save for parts, so that if someone finds out their Tag or Rolex (or whatever) is a fake with one of these inside and still wants me to repair it anyway (which has happened) I have a potential source of parts.  Because so far, every unmarked Chinese auto I've seen has looked exactly the same, with the same measurements as I recall, so I at least have parts to try out and see if  they will work as replacements.  I've had almost zero luck digging up that kind of movement anywhere else, since it has no name.

Posted

I actually managed to return this one for a refund.

I like having movements for practice, too. I've purchased a lot of 5 or 6 watches for cheap from eBay. There are only 2 watches in there I'm actually interested in, but I've been using the others to learn from. My skills are improving, but I did manage to have a spring fly away yesterday--never to be seen again.

Posted
1 hour ago, KarlvonKoln said:

Edit: WAIT A MINUTE!  THIS ONE *IS* MARKED!
H&L Inc.  I may have to see if I can find out more about that.  This is the first one I've seen with any marking of any kind.  How did I miss that before?  Thanks for posting this picture!

DUDE!   I found out something!  There may be no model numbers for these *BUT* they are variations on the DG2812 and the DG2813, which you can get on Esslinger.com.  The major difference between the DG28 series, and FreelanceAstronaut's one from H&L Inc. is that the H&L only has 7 jewels - whereas the DG28 series have 22 jewels.  Outside of that, they are interchangeable.
So, if worse came to worse, and I had a customer who knew they had a fake, but wanted their watch running again anyway, I would have a whole new movement to put in it if too many parts were broken.
Amazing what some pics will do!

https://www.esslinger.com/watch-movement-dg2812-mechanical-movements/

  • Like 1

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • it would be nice to have the exact model of the watch the or a picture so we can see exactly what you're talking about. this is because the definition of Swiss watch could be a variety of things and it be helpful if we could see exactly the watch your dealing with then in professional watch repair at least some professionals they do pre-cleaned watches. In other words the hands and dial come off and the entire movement assembled goes through a cleaning machine sometimes I think a shorter bath perhaps so everything is nice and clean for disassembly makes it easier to look for problems. Then other professionals don't like pre-cleaning because it basically obliterates the scene of the crime. Especially when dealing with vintage watches where you're looking for metal filings and problems that may visually go away with cleaning. Then usually super sticky lubrication isn't really a problem for disassembly and typically shouldn't be a problem on a pallet fork bridge because there shouldn't be any lubrication on the bridge at all as you typically do not oil the pallet fork pivots.  
    • A few things you should find out before you can mske a decision of what to do. As Richard said, what is the crown and all of the crown components made of . Then also the stem .  The crown looks to have a steel washer that retains a gasket. So be careful with what chemicals you use to dissolve any stem adhesives or the use of heat. You might swell or melt the gasket unless you are prepared to change that also . The steel washer maybe reactive to alum. Something I've just used to dissolve a broken screw from a plate. First drilled out the centre of the screw with a 0.5mm carbide . Dipped only the section that held the broken screw in Rustins rust remover. This is 40 % phosphoric acid. 3 days and the screw remains were completely dissolved, no trace of steel in the brass threads. A black puddle left in the solution.
    • I suppose this will add to the confusion I have a roller jewel assortment. It lists out American pocket watches for Elgin 18 size and even 16 size it's a 50. But not all the various companies used 50-50 does seem to be common one company had a 51 and the smallest is 43. American parts are always interesting? Francis Elgin for mainsprings will tell you the thickness of the spring other companies will not even though the spring for the same number could come in a variety of thicknesses. But if we actually had the model number of your watch we would find it probably makes a reference that the roller jewel came in different dimensions. So overlook the parts book we find that? So it appears to be 18 and 16 size would be the same sort of the arson different catalog numbers and as I said we don't have your Mongol know which Log number were supposed to be using. Variety of materials garnered her sapphire single or double but zero mention about diameters. Then in a section of rollers in this case rollers with jewels we do get this down in the notes section Roller specifications but of course zero reference to the jewel size. I was really hoping the roller jewel assortment would give us sizes it doesn't really. But it does show a picture of how one particular roller jewel gauge is used  
    • Seems to still do it through my mobile data, I use an android phone almost exclusively, but I'll double check it. Thanks mark Strange, I'll try my laptop that utilities edge. I've been on site half hour since I got home, it hasn't done it yet. Thanks John
    • At work, I'm on MS Edge, not through chose, on my phone, chrome, no issues with either. 
×
×
  • Create New...