Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

It does look a bit rustic, may be better after a good clean and a good dose of looking at. Usually wire wound pots are pretty hardy unless some butcher has bbeen at it.  Clean it up then re assess. 

Posted (edited)
8 hours ago, Plato said:

No way I'd reuse that part, it's already been mucked about with, replace it with a new pot. I bet the knob is a standard size used today.

https://uk.rs-online.com/web/c/passive-components/variable-resistors/potentiometers/?searchTerm=potentiometer

that was my first thought.  "This has been messed with" but it's old and this is my first machine, I thought it could have just been a bit crude.                                                                                                                                                      I kind of want to replace it too.  Problem is like with your link you sent me, I don't know what replacement part I actually need.  I talked to Dave at Dave's Watch Parts and said he used to buy them at www.surplussales.com, but I still don't know exactly what to get.  115 volt at 75 cycles and I think it's 60 Ohm.

Edited by SonnyBurnett
Posted
23 minutes ago, SonnyBurnett said:

that was my first thought.  "This has been messed with" but it's old and this is my first machine, I thought it could have just been a bit crude.                                                                                                                                                      I kind of want to replace it too.  Problem is like with your link you sent me, I don't know what replacement part I actually need.  I talked to Dave at Dave's Watch Parts and said he used to buy them at www.surplussales.com, but I still don't know exactly what to get.  115 volt at 75 cycles and I think it's 60 Ohm.

I don't suppose you can find a circuit diagram? I sent the wrong link too, this is the correct link:

https://uk.rs-online.com/web/c/passive-components/variable-resistors/rheostats/

There must be something equivalent to what you need. But, like others have said, it might look/work a lot better when cleaned. 

Posted (edited)
14 hours ago, Plato said:

Do you mean the (RWA) RP151SD750KK? I can't find (RWA) A-29418-5.

75ohm would be near enough to 60ohm for a rheostat provided it can cope with the current/power.

At the very bottom of the page in the link on the right side.  The last one.  On my screen it shows up as (RWA) A-29418-5

Rheostat, 800 ohm, 50 watt, 0.25 amp. Type R-50. 2-1/4" diameter body, 1-3/8" behind panel depth. 1/4" diameter x 1/2" long round shaft. Made by Memcor. NSN: 5905-01-013-4370.

Dave said this one is close enough it should work.  One thing I noticed is the wattage.  it's 50 watt and the machines are rated at 60.  Also the amperage, seems low.  Can't remember what the machine runs at.

Edited by SonnyBurnett
Posted
10 hours ago, SonnyBurnett said:

At the very bottom of the page in the link on the right side.  The last one.  On my screen it shows up as (RWA) A-29418-5

Rheostat, 800 ohm, 50 watt, 0.25 amp. Type R-50. 2-1/4" diameter body, 1-3/8" behind panel depth. 1/4" diameter x 1/2" long round shaft. Made by Memcor. NSN: 5905-01-013-4370.

Dave said this one is close enough it should work.  One thing I noticed is the wattage.  it's 50 watt and the machines are rated at 60.  Also the amperage, seems low.  Can't remember what the machine runs at.

Is this is the circuit diagram to your machine?

What motor does it use? We could figure out the current.

L&R Master 2 Wiring Diagrams.jpg

Posted

A new rheostat would be quite costly, probably about $150. Another alternative to consider is to completely modify the circuit and use a SCR controlled ac motor controller. A ready built board can be purchased from a number of online sellers for less than $5.

Posted
21 minutes ago, LittleWatchShop said:

How come you do not measure the rheostat in place?

I think he did, 60ohms.

One thing I read about earlier was that some of these old rheostats might use asbestos as insulators, another reason to replace it. 

Posted
15 minutes ago, Plato said:

One thing I read about earlier was that some of these old rheostats might use asbestos as insulators, another reason to replace it. 

Why. That would be another case of unjustified fears of a danger that scientifically doesn't exist when exposure to the harmful substance non-existent, as when asbestos is firs and solid, and in a minuscole amount. One needs years of continuous exposition to fibers to get in danger of developing lung cancer.

Posted
2 hours ago, jdm said:

Why. That would be another case of unjustified fears of a danger that scientifically doesn't exist when exposure to the harmful substance non-existent, as when asbestos is firs and solid, and in a minuscole amount. One needs years of continuous exposition to fibers to get in danger of developing lung cancer.

@jdm what part of the world do you live in that you don't consider asbestos a risk?! 

Posted
4 hours ago, Plato said:

Have a look at the schematic. Aren't you a PhD in electronics? 

Your hand drawn schematic is wrong at least in one place.  Furthermore, I measure the rheostat on my cleaning machine and it measures closer to 800 ohms.  And, yes, I do have a Ph.D. in electrical engineering.

Posted

Even a PhD won't be able to tell the correct value for the rheostat with the limited information given. 

The value would depend on the internal resistance of the motor used in the machine. I'm sure the motor must have changed over the decades of production.

But 50 ohms does seem a little low.

Posted
7 hours ago, LittleWatchShop said:

Your hand drawn schematic is wrong at least in one place.  Furthermore, I measure the rheostat on my cleaning machine and it measures closer to 800 ohms.  And, yes, I do have a Ph.D. in electrical engineering.

It's not my diagram, I found it on the nawcc website. 

Posted
6 hours ago, HectorLooi said:

Even a PhD won't be able to tell the correct value for the rheostat with the limited information given. 

The value would depend on the internal resistance of the motor used in the machine. I'm sure the motor must have changed over the decades of production.

But 50 ohms does seem a little low.

I did ask about the motor. 

Posted
11 hours ago, Plato said:

@jdm what part of the world do you live in that you don't consider asbestos a risk?! 

In one where science is taught. I never said asbestos is not risky, but that it is in certain quantities and modes.
Fearing otherwise is unwarranted paranoia. Quote fron the first article I rant into:

A one-off exposure from do-it-yourself renovation is not a major risk
https://www.asbestos.com/exposure/short-term/

There is a major difference between asbestos in tons, or fractions of, and the scarce gram which could a sigle electronic insulator. Beside, isn't even proven than what is being discusses is indeed made of that.

Posted
6 hours ago, HectorLooi said:

Even a PhD won't be able to tell the correct value for the rheostat with the limited information given. 

Maybe a PhD doesn't, but people of practical experience do. As mentioned, 50 or 60 Ohm is little for any "power application".

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • it would be nice to have the exact model of the watch the or a picture so we can see exactly what you're talking about. this is because the definition of Swiss watch could be a variety of things and it be helpful if we could see exactly the watch your dealing with then in professional watch repair at least some professionals they do pre-cleaned watches. In other words the hands and dial come off and the entire movement assembled goes through a cleaning machine sometimes I think a shorter bath perhaps so everything is nice and clean for disassembly makes it easier to look for problems. Then other professionals don't like pre-cleaning because it basically obliterates the scene of the crime. Especially when dealing with vintage watches where you're looking for metal filings and problems that may visually go away with cleaning. Then usually super sticky lubrication isn't really a problem for disassembly and typically shouldn't be a problem on a pallet fork bridge because there shouldn't be any lubrication on the bridge at all as you typically do not oil the pallet fork pivots.  
    • A few things you should find out before you can mske a decision of what to do. As Richard said, what is the crown and all of the crown components made of . Then also the stem .  The crown looks to have a steel washer that retains a gasket. So be careful with what chemicals you use to dissolve any stem adhesives or the use of heat. You might swell or melt the gasket unless you are prepared to change that also . The steel washer maybe reactive to alum. Something I've just used to dissolve a broken screw from a plate. First drilled out the centre of the screw with a 0.5mm carbide . Dipped only the section that held the broken screw in Rustins rust remover. This is 40 % phosphoric acid. 3 days and the screw remains were completely dissolved, no trace of steel in the brass threads. A black puddle left in the solution.
    • I suppose this will add to the confusion I have a roller jewel assortment. It lists out American pocket watches for Elgin 18 size and even 16 size it's a 50. But not all the various companies used 50-50 does seem to be common one company had a 51 and the smallest is 43. American parts are always interesting? Francis Elgin for mainsprings will tell you the thickness of the spring other companies will not even though the spring for the same number could come in a variety of thicknesses. But if we actually had the model number of your watch we would find it probably makes a reference that the roller jewel came in different dimensions. So overlook the parts book we find that? So it appears to be 18 and 16 size would be the same sort of the arson different catalog numbers and as I said we don't have your Mongol know which Log number were supposed to be using. Variety of materials garnered her sapphire single or double but zero mention about diameters. Then in a section of rollers in this case rollers with jewels we do get this down in the notes section Roller specifications but of course zero reference to the jewel size. I was really hoping the roller jewel assortment would give us sizes it doesn't really. But it does show a picture of how one particular roller jewel gauge is used  
    • Seems to still do it through my mobile data, I use an android phone almost exclusively, but I'll double check it. Thanks mark Strange, I'll try my laptop that utilities edge. I've been on site half hour since I got home, it hasn't done it yet. Thanks John
    • At work, I'm on MS Edge, not through chose, on my phone, chrome, no issues with either. 
×
×
  • Create New...