Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I'm looking to get a beginners book on quartz watch repair.  I'm just looking for the basics.  I could not find quartz watch repair for dummies. Any suggestions?

Posted (edited)
2 hours ago, markr said:

I'm looking to get a beginners book on quartz watch repair.

I've never repaired a quartz watch and will likely never do that. Not because I don't like quartz watches, but because I'm more into mechanical watches. Anyway, I have serviced an ETA quartz movement (Calibre 955.112) and was surprised to see how the non-electronic parts were basically the same as in a mechanical watch. Anyway, If it's of any use to you, you'll find my service walkthrough of that ETA quartz movement here.

Edited by VWatchie
  • Thanks 1
Posted
4 hours ago, markr said:

I'm looking to get a beginners book on quartz watch repair

No book is needed for a beginner, but a "line release" box is. Or at least a demagnetizer. Next,  after that failing check or replace coil.

  • Thanks 1
Posted
43 minutes ago, jdm said:

No book is needed for a beginner, but a "line release" box is. Or at least a demagnetizer. Next,  after that failing check or replace coil.

I would avoid a demagnetiser on electonic circuits, personally. 

  • Thanks 1
Posted

Thanks all for your input.  I'm looking for how to test the coil, crystal,motor, and any other electronic parts.  

Posted

There are many pulse testers available online. Get one that can check battery voltage, do line release and test for a motor pulse. Some of the newer ones can even test the timing accuracy. 

To test the coil, all you need is a multimeter set to resistance testing mode.

But to test the current consumption of the circuit, I'm afraid there is no easy way. I use a Bulova Accutron test meter which was designed to test tuning fork watches but can be used to give a rough idea of the consumption current. A proper quartz watch testing machine, like those made by Witschi, is not something that a hobbyist would buy.

My mentor explained to me why a professional watchmaker might not want to buy a Witschi quartz tester. If you test a watch that your customer brings in and pronounce it defective and then the customer brings it to another watchmaker who just replaces the battery and charges for it, the customer would think you are incompetent. 

Then when the battery fails after 6 months, he would just replace the battery again and tell you if it dies in six months again, you'll need to service the watch or buy a new one. 

Posted
13 hours ago, Plato said:

I would avoid a demagnetiser on electonic circuits, personally. 

That is how a "line free" device works - an electromagnetic field to give the motor that extra impulse which may be needed to win over congealed oil or what else could be blocking the train.. Since I don't have one, I use a demagnetizer for mechanical watches, that is pretty much the same . A short pulse is all one needs and if positive, the result is immediately visible.
I have numerous successes and never damaged anything. That is no surprise, because the miniature "electronic circuit" of a typical quartz module, doers not have any special characteristic which makes it vulnerable by magnetic fields. Furthermore, when a quartz module of average cost EUR 5 has stopped, there is really nothing to lose in trying what I have explained above.

Posted
5 hours ago, HectorLooi said:

But to test the current consumption of the circuit, I'm afraid there is no easy way.

There is no immediate easy way, but what one can do is to use a sensitive digital multimeter, approx EUR 40, and build the small fixture which is needed to insert it between a battery and the watch under test.

 

5 hours ago, HectorLooi said:

My mentor explained to me why a professional watchmaker might not want to buy a Witschi quartz tester. If you test a watch that your customer brings in and pronounce it defective and then the customer brings it to another watchmaker who just replaces the battery and charges for it, the customer would think you are incompetent. 

That makes no sense to me . First, replace the battery, if it works in most case job is done, period. Only if there are doubts, or the customer complain of short battery life, then one can explore further, explaining the customer in full before and after in doing that. But if the customer is not interested in that stuff, or the material value of the watch does not warrant extra work, deliver as it is and move one. If you look at the few competent watchmakers that don't snob working on quartz (Archer is an example), they have all the costly gear, and for what they charge, it will pay back eventually.

Posted
25 minutes ago, jdm said:

That is how a "line free" device works - an electromagnetic field to give the motor that extra impulse which may be needed to win over congealed oil or what else could be blocking the train.. Since I don't have one, I use a demagnetizer for mechanical watches, that is pretty much the same . A short pulse is all one needs and if positive, the result is immediately visible.
I have numerous successes and never damaged anything. That is no surprise, because the miniature "electronic circuit" of a typical quartz module, doers not have any special characteristic which makes it vulnerable by magnetic fields. Furthermore, when a quartz module of average cost EUR 5 has stopped, there is really nothing to lose in trying what I have explained above.

Doesn't the line release tool have a rotating electromagnetic field (Horotec Turbo) whereas the demagnetiser (the one I'm thinking of - Antimag 2) creates a large pulse followed by pulses of smaller magnitude? Maybe for an analogue quartz it would be OK but I wouldn't put it near anything digital... or am I confusing the issue with old magnetic storage media?

Posted
4 hours ago, Plato said:

Doesn't the line release tool have a rotating electromagnetic field (Horotec Turbo) whereas the demagnetiser (the one I'm thinking of - Antimag 2) creates a large pulse followed by pulses of smaller magnitude?

You are talking about Swiss branded products, which are costly and as as buying incentive may deliver additional features.

While I'm referring to the typical, low priced, China made "quartz line release", or "blue box demag", or even "Bergeon 3321 copy". These all deliver a pulse that is as long as you press the button.

 

4 hours ago, Plato said:

or am I confusing the issue with old magnetic storage media?

Yes, I believe you are. Back in the stone age, my 3.5" floppy disks and their external unit could not stand even close to the CRT monitors without becoming corrupted. Lucky, these troubles are now a thing of the past.

  • Like 1
Posted

I know submerging the movement in lighter fluid for ten to fifteen seconds would not hurt its electronics. 

So if you drop the movement with battery fitted and running, in lighter fluid for ten seconds, old dried oil will somewhat dissolve, take the movement out let dry as its runing. 

In case this movement has no electronic issue, it will keep good time again for couple of months plus you know all it needs is a clean and lube. 

Just a dummn idea thats known to work.🧐

  • Like 1
Posted
3 hours ago, Plato said:

I'm tempted to see if I can break anything with my demagnetiser!!

Surely one can. Spinning the hands that fast on a quartz is the same as winding without the pallets fork in place on a mechanical. Do that long enough and something will break.

Posted

Basic checj=ks can be done with a muiltimeter. Re Hectors post, Depending on the quality and ranges will limit what you can do so always but a good one.

I use a purpose built tools for checking and testing quartz watches and also coupled with two home built devices all of which do a good job. This has been discussed before so have a look via the search box on the home page. My line release is a small mains transformer with the appropriate fuses and switch which when activated creates a magnetic field which pulses the rotor that moves the hands round in a controlled manner, lack of contol can damage the watch.

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • After another long hiatus (while waiting for truing calipers to arrive), I’ve made some more progress. TRUING IN THE FLAT I was able to use the calipers I purchased to true the wheel in the flat. There’s still a very slight eccentricity in the round, but I’m going to leave it as is. It doesn’t wobble any more and I’m happy with that. Thanks for the tool recommendation @mbwatch. It worked well, though I must say it takes a delicate touch to get the balance between the calipers. Also, my calipers effectively have four different variations based on the orientation of the arms (2 sides, 2 orientations each). Some are more tapered than others, though to what end, I can’t quite tell. My first thought was that flipping them over yields arms that can be used for poising. They are K&D horizontal calipers, btw. OSCILLATION TEST @nevenbekriev @JohnR725 After truing the wheel in the flat, I carefully remounted the hairspring and did your oscillation test. Balance wheel mounted to balance cock, no pallet fork, rotate balance wheel 180 degrees, let it go, and time+count the oscillations. Results as follows for dial down orientation: Duration: 1m 15sec (to full stop) # of oscillations: About 125, though the amplitude of the oscillations decreased significantly, as one might expect I should redo the test in at least two other orientations…Forgot to do that. 🙂  In general, it’s safe to say this watch has a pretty low amplitude, likely for a variety of reasons. I haven’t oiled the balance jewels FWIW…I should probably do that, but I really don’t want to keep disassembling and reassembling the balance. Is it possible to oil those jewels (top and bottom) by just removing the capstones and putting in a tiny amount of oil, with balance in place? I can see how having the pivot in the jewel hole could change how capillary action works, and thus might pull more oil in than desired. However, those capillary forces will be in effect anyway once the balance is inserted. PRACTICE MOVEMENTS @JohnR725 I agree with your sentiment about using practice movements wholeheartedly, and I’ve done that to some degree. The watch I’m currently repairing is for a friend, and she was willing to have me treat it as a “learn-by-doing experience.” With that said,, I probably should have purchased a few more “beaters” before getting to something where I don’t want to muck things up. I’ve still got a couple of those on the bench that I used as donors, and I’ll try to rehabilitate them.
    • Hi, this is the first place I found when looking for advice so I hope someone could advise me.  Im completely new to touching watches but I’ve always wondered how they work.  I’ve bought a cheap movement, an ETA replica to take apart and rebuild.  Im thinking I’ll need some screwdrivers, tweezers, movement holder and a loop? My goal is just to have a go first and see if I enjoy it enough before buying more tools.  Do I buy cheap tools for now and get better quality tools later if I enjoy it like I think I will? or will the cheap tools be a pain and take some of the fun out of it?  With quality tools being relatively expensive I’m unsure what to buy.    Any advice would be greatly appreciated!
    • Yeah I have seen 44-56 documented for Elgin 18 size elsewhere. I have the style of gauge that's like a set of feeler gauges and I never noticed before today it is faintly stamped "Elgin". Pictured is the way I have been measuring. I am going to go to a larger jewel than the 42 that had been in there. I recently won an auction on a big set of Fitrite jewels all in the little bottles, to discover that the what's actually in the bottles bears no relation to the chart of sizes printed on the box. In most cases it seems to be all mixed so in fact I have about 24 little bottles and thousands of assorted jewels of all diameters and lengths, which is better than nothing. But since I don't have a micrometer with a table, measuring for the exact diameter will be a big job. Instead I will test a lot of them in the fork slot the same way I measure with the gauge. But this is still the next thing. I have to get the escapement to unlock first.
    • it would be nice to have the exact model of the watch the or a picture so we can see exactly what you're talking about. this is because the definition of Swiss watch could be a variety of things and it be helpful if we could see exactly the watch your dealing with then in professional watch repair at least some professionals they do pre-cleaned watches. In other words the hands and dial come off and the entire movement assembled goes through a cleaning machine sometimes I think a shorter bath perhaps so everything is nice and clean for disassembly makes it easier to look for problems. Then other professionals don't like pre-cleaning because it basically obliterates the scene of the crime. Especially when dealing with vintage watches where you're looking for metal filings and problems that may visually go away with cleaning. Then usually super sticky lubrication isn't really a problem for disassembly and typically shouldn't be a problem on a pallet fork bridge because there shouldn't be any lubrication on the bridge at all as you typically do not oil the pallet fork pivots.  
    • A few things you should find out before you can mske a decision of what to do. As Richard said, what is the crown and all of the crown components made of . Then also the stem .  The crown looks to have a steel washer that retains a gasket. So be careful with what chemicals you use to dissolve any stem adhesives or the use of heat. You might swell or melt the gasket unless you are prepared to change that also . The steel washer maybe reactive to alum. Something I've just used to dissolve a broken screw from a plate. First drilled out the centre of the screw with a 0.5mm carbide . Dipped only the section that held the broken screw in Rustins rust remover. This is 40 % phosphoric acid. 3 days and the screw remains were completely dissolved, no trace of steel in the brass threads. A black puddle left in the solution.
×
×
  • Create New...