Jump to content

1940? Elgin Pocket Watch


EmuGuru

Recommended Posts

I recently received this little gem from my father, who I believe got it from his. I know little to nothing about watches except what I’ve learned reading and watching videos of watch repairs in the last 48hrs. The crystal is yellowed, and cracked along the edge, causing it to fall out of the bezel constantly, and appears slightly damaged by some chemical. The balance wheel’s shaft’s pivot points (what are these called?) are broken, causing the balance wheel to sit on the .... base plate? And not turn freely. Otherwise i think its in good shape. Would anyone recommend trying to replace the balance shaft, or just trying to find an entire balance complete to replace? And the crystal.... should I stay with the acrylic and replace it or use glass and some form of cement to hold it in? Any thoughts, comments, questions, or advice would be super welcome!

68E94364-A42B-442C-948C-3258D3F15AF9.jpeg

CEB6CDB9-8031-4233-B4E7-01BAD49F2784.jpeg

17E6EBB0-3096-472A-9EBB-62D18BD1297D.jpeg

61E3CD4C-3112-4901-B690-B9122D82238D.jpeg

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nice watch. The dial stands out, they are easily cracked be careful. Size 16s. 3000 made in '40

Serial Number SN Range Quanty Name Year grade size code jewels Adj/reg/etc. -------------- -------- ------ ---- ---- ----- ---- ------ ------ ------------ 39858593 39856001 3000 1940 387 16s o3n7p 17j e

 

Edited by GomBoo
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks for the tips and info guys, i will begin searching for a complete balance, after looking into poising, and replacing the staff itself....... yessir that appears well above my pay-grade and far surpasses my measly toolset lol

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 5/13/2021 at 5:25 PM, EmuGuru said:

entire balance complete

I really wouldn't do that. One of the reasons they serial numbered watches was to keep track of everything. Like all the plates will have the ending part of the serial number. Typically the balance wheel has the serial number scribed on the arms.

Then there is the other little problem? I have a link below that talks about your watch including the parts looks like you need balance staff 861 but which one? Which also means if you get another balance wheel that has the same staff is it going to have the right staff? Which of course is a really stupid question because you just need 861? One of the problems with American pocket watch staffs typically are they come with different pivot sizes. Than Elgin was even more creative than just pivots size variation often times there can be other variations like this staff comes in either new style or old-style you know which one you have? You can't tell the parts list you have to actually measure the staff.

Then when was the last time this watch was serviced? It looks to be a really beautiful Condition it probably hasn't been serviced that much. That means it should be entirely disassembled cleaned lubricated and should have a new mainspring in addition to the balance staff. Plus you need to check the balance jewels and make sure they didn't get broken in whatever caused the pivots to break

 

On 5/13/2021 at 6:43 PM, Nucejoe said:

Aren't watch glasses all made flat or faceted, you would need a domed crystal.

This definitely looks like the original Crystal it came with the watch domed plastic. Typically it's inserted with a press it's held in by friction no glue required. So if you're trying to keep the watch original replace it with another plastic crystal.

 

https://pocketwatchdatabase.com/search/result/elgin/39858593

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The "glass" looks like it could be celluloid or cellulose acetate, which will be difficult to replace exactly, but acrylic is close in terms of feel and function. I don't know what collectors say about the importance of originality. I would take it to a professional for a service and a new balance staff (well actually, I would let a rank amateur do it i.e. me, but you should go to a pro). A beautiful watch, congratulations!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, Klassiker said:

The "glass" looks like it could be celluloid or cellulose acetate, which will be difficult to replace exactly, but acrylic is close in terms of feel and function. I don't know what collectors say about the importance of originality.

Whatever it is its related to cellulose nitrate because they burn really nice.

Then I didn't realize that crystals like this were hard to get? I would've assumed because they made thousands of pocket watches in this country that you can still get plastic pocket watch crystals? Yes I assume it be a different kind of a plastic but they would still look like the same thing wouldn't they?

Edited by JohnR725
Link to comment
Share on other sites

John, thats a really great point about the serial numbers, i definitely want to keep as much original as possible. Thanks for pointing that out! Also great points about the staff, since this is my first, no I have no idea which I have, i will do some measuring and hunting before committing to anything or anyone. As for service, I honestly doubt it ever has, the rest of my family isn't known for their maintenance of things lol. And yes since keeping with originality is my ocd goal, another plastic, cellulose or whatevs it is, is definitely in order. I naively presumed they wouldn't have had plastic domes back in 1940, and assumed it had probably been changed. But I had not thought of cellulose based crystals. And it definitely is as you pointed out press fit without any adhesive needed. I will definitely dig in and do more research. Thanks John and Klassiker! You've given me a ton to research and learn! Much appreciated!

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Plastic = acrylic will be easy to get, will look and feel right, will fit nice and tight, will be transparent and will protect the watch from dust and moisture, but it will not be original. I don't know if that is a concern for collectors in general or this owner in particular. It would not bother me in the least and I would not hesitate to replace yellowed celluloid with clear acrylic. If the correct size is fitted, it will not be necessary to use glue.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

replace it with one that fits, if its glass/plastic, doesn't really matter. put the original yellowed crystal in a bag and keep it. if you ever sell it, trade it, include the old crystal and then the next person can decide what to do with it.

I'm **BLEEP** about getting watches back to how they left the factory but recently I have mellowed to the point, you wouldn't drive a restored car with a windscreen you can't see through would you ? so why keep a crystal you can't see through ? 

if the next person is like I was 5 years ago, they can swap the crystal back.

Elgin offered Glass, Plastic.

you will need to find a watch crystal catalog from 1942/43/44 and try and find a match using the measurement. I don't have any from that era. 

I'm pretty sure this is your watch from the 1942 catalog - note the Montgomery dial option

image.png.754b0ffda3b0c4cd26971d9bf886ce9c.png

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 years later...
On 5/18/2021 at 3:08 AM, EmuGuru said:

Thanks for the tips and info guys, i will begin searching for a complete balance, after looking into poising, and replacing the staff itself....... yessir that appears well above my pay-grade and far surpasses my measly toolset lol

Replacing the staff of a watch movement is a complex and highly skilled task that should ideally be performed by an experienced watchmaker. The staff is a critical component as it holds the balance wheel, hairspring, and pallet fork, affecting the watch's timekeeping. To replace the staff, the watchmaker would need to disassemble the movement, remove the old staff, and install a new one. This process involves aligning the staff's pivots with extreme precision, ensuring the correct endshake and end-play, and carefully adjusting the balance wheel for proper amplitude and beat rate. It's a meticulous procedure that requires specialized tools, skills, and experience. If you're not a professional watchmaker, attempting to replace the staff yourself can lead to significant damage to the movement and may be best left to experts in the field.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Post some pictures , some good close ones of the parts you've described. 
    • Ive never used epilame H only information i have read and mentally stored about it mostly from Nicklesilver here and elsewhere ( the fork horns thing ), maybe the residue powder that is removed has some grinding effect ? So probably a good idea to limit its application areas to only the absolute necessary. Yes as far as i know epilame rubs off relatively easy, the technique of running the watch to make a groove through it first in the pallet stones where the lubrication is then placed. This i understand creates the barrier for the lube to sit up to. If i can find a good balance of pros and cons of its use then thats one process i can avoid by using a thixotropic lube on the stones. The epilame i would say allows for a more fluid lubrication to be used that would increase amplitude on low beat movements. The stearic acid powder is extremely cheap, the problem is the fuming process to coat parts, is not selective , the whole part has to treated in this method. If epilame residue can cause wear then thats not good, if I remember the conclusion was not proved entirely just a general assumption between watchmakers. The thread is out there somewhere, the same discussion is also old on a facebook group. Ive never used epilame H only information i have read and mentally stored about it mostly from Nicklesilver here and elsewhere ( the fork horns thing ), maybe the residue powder that is removed has some grinding effect ? So probably a good idea to limit its application areas to only the absolute necessary. Yes as far as i know epilame rubs off relatively easy, the technique of running the watch to make a groove through it first in the pallet stones where the lubrication is then placed. This i understand creates the barrier for the lube to sit up to. If i can find a good balance of pros and cons of its use then thats one process i can avoid by using a thixotropic lube on the stones. The epilame i would say allows for a more fluid lubrication to be used that would increase amplitude on low beat movements. The stearic acid powder is extremely cheap, the problem is the fuming process to coat parts, is not selective , the whole part has to treated in this method. If epilame residue can cause wear then thats not good, if I remember the conclusion was not proved entirely just a general assumption between watchmakers. The thread is out there somewhere, the same discussion is also old on a facebook group. If its a potential problem for amateurs to use then i would prefer not to take the risk .
    • Following on from my question about identifying screws in the AS2063 movement that basically fell out of the case in bits, I’m pleased to report that I’ve got it all back together, and the movement is running pretty well.    But… There’s something wrong with the keyless works and hand setting. It’s fine in winding and quickset date position - these work - but in hand setting position winding the crown turns the whole gear train.  I don’t really understand how it’s meant to work. It doesn’t have a traditional friction fit cannon pinion.  The second wheel is unusual with a pair of smaller pinions on it, which seem to interact with the barrel and the motion works.    Could this be the problem? I must admit I just cleaned it and popped it in place when reassembling the gear train. I’ve lubricated the pivots but didn’t do anything to the extra bits on the second wheel.    Does this make sense and is anyone able to figure out what I’m doing wrong? Thanks in advance, as always.    ETA - the parts list calls it the Great Wheel, not second wheel. 
    • You're thinking metal to jewel in general I guess. Maybe it would be a good idea to peg the pallet staff jewel hole on the main plate after the epilame treatment. I think that could work as it is my impression that the epilame doesn't sit very hard, but I could be wrong about that so feel free to educate me. I didn't remember that 9501 was thixotropic (thanks for the link). That would mean it's even runnier during impact (lower viscosity) so perhaps it's time I get some fresh grease as mine seems a bit too runny. What I have seen is a whitish surface after washing but it goes away if I scrub the surface with a brush in a degreaser (Horosolv). I don't think it embeds itself in the metal but sticks very hard to the metal. I don't worry too much about the cleaning solution. I just want perfectly clean parts and my solution can be replaced for little money (ELMA RED 1:9). Anyway, I quite often need "to strip back and rebuild" and scrubbing parts by hand isn't exactly the most stimulating part of a service. Just got confirmation that Moebius 9501 has a lower viscosity (68 cSt at 20° C) than 9504 (305 cSt at 20°). The viscosity of Molykote DX is 285-315 cSt at -25° to +125° C. I was surprised to see that the viscosity of Moebius 9010 (thin oil!) is higher (150 cSt at 20°) than my 9501 grease!
    • I’ve had a couple movements where it is clear the previous watchmaker was diligent with lubrication but the old epilam had turned to a fine white powder covering the pallet fork and keyless parts, which can’t be good for parts. I’m spare with epi since I don’t know how long it takes to degrade to that state…
×
×
  • Create New...