Jump to content

Shellac to fasten crystal?


Recommended Posts

I have an old watch with a sapphire crystal that appears to have been fastened with shellac. I’m assuming that was factory work in 1925. The crystal has been taped on while the watch sat in a drawer over the last 50+ yrs.

does anybody still flow shellac into the crystal bed on the case? Obviously, there are better choices today, but how big of a deal is the originality of this on an old expensive watch?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not sure when the first sapphire watch crystals became available, 1925 seems too early as the process for creating synthetic sapphires was first developed  after 1910.  Rolex didn't start using them for watch crystals until 1970, so if this was factory work it would predate this by 45 years.

Otherwise there were watches made with natural sapphire crystals also. Must be quite the watch. Can you post a photo?

Do you think the shellac was applied as a thick varnish adhesive, or flowed with heat? Seems like shellac would be a logical adhesive choice for 1925.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Woolshire said:

I have an old watch with a sapphire crystal that appears to have been fastened with shellac. I’m assuming that was factory work in 1925. 

I'm in agreement with the above posting 1925 seems a bit early for a sapphire crystal are you sure it's not glass? Then doubtful it was shellac I don't think I've ever heard of that being used to glue with a crystal. Then they do make glue for crystals but the most common thing now is epoxy glue.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, Woolshire said:

real sapphire

If you touch a sapphire crystal it will have a cold feeling. It's better at conducting heat then glass.

Looks like from Wikipedia your right synthetic sapphire came into existence In 1902.

 

6 hours ago, Woolshire said:

old expensive watch

Out of curiosity what is the name of this watch?

 

Unfortunately it's a little early but at the link below you'll find a catalogue of 1899 of watch supplies and optical supplies. Conveniently on the crystal page it doesn't say how they're fastened. But in the optics section of course there is optical cement for gluing lenses together which conceivably was used here.

https://archive.org/details/20thcenturycatal00purd

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Here's a link that might find interesting.  It was helping with my memory I was trying remember this Canada Balsam. Basically early glue for lenses  and you look at what it is  kinda like a weird form a shellac in a way  very likely what they might've been using.

http:// [Search domain wp.optics.arizona.edu/optomech/wp-content/uploads/sites/53/2016/10/ClementsTutorial1.doc] https://wp.optics.arizona.edu/optomech/wp-content/uploads/sites/53/2016/10/ClementsTutorial1.doc

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Canada_balsam

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wow...thanks for the detective work and info! The watch is a Patek. I’m thinking if anyone used sapphire for crystals, it would be them.

I did get the goo off the crystal and case, using just a small amount of naphtha. Didn’t disturb any patina, at all. I also got the old dried shallac-like stuff off with just a softened toothpick.

 I’m pretty sure the crystal is sapphire and original. 
I am still wondering about the best way to glue it. It fits nicely, but not going to stay in without glue. I know the likely best option is clear epoxy, but am wondering if figuring out exactly what was used at the factory (and if using that) falls into that whole originality concept.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, JohnR725 said:

Looks like from Wikipedia your right synthetic sapphire came into existence In 1902.

Unless my wikipedia reading is incorrect, 1902 is for  synthetic rubies, these would have been small red crystals. They achieved blue sapphire in 1911, again gem-sized, but not gem-quality. I really don't think they had the abilities to create watch-sized optical quality crystals until much later. Depends on the size of the watch, of course. But if it's optically clear and not tinted at all, I'd be suspicious. I'm pretty sure I've seen a photo of a watch covered by a polished natural crystal, but very old and not very clear.

I suspect the advancements enabling watch crystals to be made with synthetic sapphire came from the semiconductor industry, which would correlate with their wider introduction starting in 1970 on the beta21 quartz models.

Interestingly, with all the writing on watches out there, I can't find a good article on the history of using sapphire crystals in watches. Good subject for someone to write an article.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, KOwatch said:

Unless my wikipedia reading is incorrect, 1902 is for  synthetic rubies, these would have been small red crystals. They achieved blue sapphire in 1911, again gem-sized, but not gem-quality. I really don't think they had the abilities to create watch-sized optical quality crystals until much later.

I was trying to be agreeable and cheerful not my usual critical negative self. Out of curiosity I asked at work today because we put a lot of sapphire crystals in For the fun of it I asked my boss. Perhaps the 70s and that would be 1970s not 1870s.

There is another alternative perhaps?  Another possibility would have been quartz optical grade quartz crystal. I'm pretty sure that larger pieces of natural stone. Zero idea when they synthesized quartz.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sapphire watch crystals may have come about as a bye product of the defence industry. Single crystal sapphire was grown to use as sensor windows for infrared sensors and missiles, due to it's toughness and being translucent to infrared.  

So possibly created late 50's - 60s, but the military wouldn't want it out in general use. My guess would be no earlier than the 70's ?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am familiar with the Patek website.  I’m guessing they won’t tell me anything about the glue they used then or now. But, good thought and I will submit a question.
This sure looked like shellac. However, I would think that they would have used something more colorless. Maybe this was colorless back then????

It sounds like we’re not sure what was used originally. Fish glue or potentially a rubber-based glue...or a near-colorless shellac ?‍♂️

As for current times, clear epoxy is commonly used. UV glue and G-S are also popular. Since this isn’t something that seems to be a “originality” issue, I need to choose one that will hold the darn thing on, and move forward.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Hello, I am about 5 months into watchmaking and I love it!   The attention to precise detail is what really attracts me to it. (and the tools!) I am working on a 16 jewel 43mm pocket watch movement.   There are no markings besides a serial number (122248) .  The balance staff needs replacement. The roller side pivot broke off.  I successfully removed the hairspring using Bergeon 5430's.  I successfully removed the roller using Bergeon 2810.   Did i mention I love the tools?! I removed the staff from the balance wheel using a vintage K&D staff removal tool  with my Bergeon 15285 (that's the one that comes with a micrometer adjustment so it can be used as a jewel press as well as a traditional staking tool...it's sooooo cool...sorry..  can you tell i love the tools?) No more digressing..  I measured the damaged staff in all the relevant areas but I have to estimate on some because one of the pivots is missing. A = Full length  A= 4.80mm  (that's without the one pivot...if you assume that the missing pivot is the same length as the other pivot (I'm sure it's not)  then A = 5.12 mm...(can I assume 5.00mm here?) F=  Hair spring collet seat  F=  .89mm   (safe to assume .90 here? .. I am sure that my measurement's would at least contain  .01 mm error ?) G = balance wheel seat  G = 1.23 mm  (1.20mm?) H  =  roller staff  H =  .59mm  (.60 mm?) B  = bottom of the wheel to roller pivot   B  = 2.97mm  (3.00 mm?)     here I am estimating  again because this pivot is missing. So my friends, and I thank you profusely,  can you point me in the right direction as to how to proceed? Do i buy individual staffs?  or an assortment?   Since I don't know exactly the name of the manufacturer, will that be a fatal hindrance?   Tbh, I'm not even sure what country of origin this movement is. Thank you!    
    • Thats why i asked that question earlier, what happens if lubrication is placed directly on top of epilame ?  As opposed to walled within its non epilamed area . I'm not saying its right, i have no idea , just asking questions. 
    • thinking of where epilam should be removed did you know there was a patent that covers this? At least for the escapement I'm attaching it. GB1057607A-1 epilame.pdf
    • Back home...printing now.  Will report results
    • Oh well, if Master @nickelsilver says it's the way to go, then it is the way to go! I stand corrected! 🫡 Are there any other places where you're supposed to remove the epilame from the contact point of rubbing? I don't think so! Thanks for the effort @Neverenoughwatches, much appreciated! 🙂👍
×
×
  • Create New...