Jump to content

Help identifying pocket watch movement


Recommended Posts

Yes back then as well still now some casers and retailers insisted and maybe paid more to get complety sterile mov.ts. 

Others paid more to have some modifications made to the bridge layout and then apply their markings. 

There were no reliable sources of information outside industry circles and perhaps few precious illustrated parts catalogue.

Buyers were left either buying big names otherwise hanging to the word of the jeweller telling and selling them whatever he wanted.

It was a very competitive and profitable market for a necessary item, the equivalent of a smartphone today. 

 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Look at cortebert as suggested earlier looks similar but all the ones i have looked at the balance bridge curves to right where's this kinda curves left ?

Thanks oldhippy, I will post photo of keyless work tomorrow, hopefully will shed some light 

Many thanks 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Russian Malnija amd marathon are said to be copied off of cortebert, but Russian put long reference number on their movements, I wonder if anyone else copied this  cortebert design.

Malnija 3602 came in 16 and 18 jewels out of two factory, which furthure complicates things.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, oldhippy said:

Should be able to i d it by the keyless work under the dial. We need to see a photo of the complete keyless work

We need the diameter of the movement measured on the dial side. Then a picture of the dial side. The only minor catch is the bestfit book which is the standard reference to look for these things I have a suspicion favors watches imported into the US and that one was not. In other words there is no import codes on the watch.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, BillF said:

Have done bit of googling for marks and fond swiss makers marks

The AM triangle - A. Michel

TR in shield - Ebauches trust

Cant fins anything about these though can anyone help ?

Thanks 

Both A-Michel and Adolf shields are brand watchmakers, I wonder if this could be a joint production.

I would focus on A shield .

What do you need the caliber No for, do you need a part? 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's still a long shot because of the age but we could use the fingerprint system from the setting parts but we need a size which I don't see? The reason I need a size is because without a size I have to go through each of the sizes looking to see if anything matches. On the other hand how many to look at?

https://blog.esslinger.com/watch-size-ligne-conversion-chart/

The fingerprint system is by size of the movement which is why asked. If this had been a smaller size there would be so many images I wouldn't of wasted my time. Fortunately the setting parts unique enough that I can skim through relatively quickly until I got to 17. You get the pick and choose which one you like the best. If you had the physical bestfit book and I don't know about the PDF I'm assuming they scanned it properly. If you had the physical PDF book than the part would exactly fit on the book. So each one of those should be different you have more than one to choose from. Then it was really helpful you got one of the names right.

fingerprint 17 L.JPG

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

59 minutes ago, BillF said:

Have looked at them and there appears to be 4 that are the same unfortunately the file downloads as jpg and not to scale so cannot lay over to see sizes :0(

 

Out of curiosity would you just like to have the stem numbers and not know how I came up with them?

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, BillF said:

Stem numbers would be great and would be nice to know how you came up with them also as good to learn :0)

I've never actually tried to print the pages in the book to see if the PDF is properly scaled or not. You have to get the setting roof right and you have to have the right size piece of paper. But still we should build a look at your setting parts look at the images see if anything matches. Then the next step would be to look in the book and see if those numbers come up with a stem number. But I can't do that because I am having a hard time reading which one you thought it was no numbers listed so okay let's have you do that step. I snipped out the sections of the book that have the 17 sized watch you'll notice there is actually several stems so it be helpful to know which movement you think it is.

Then of course still the other way to do this is if we knew the size of your old stem? This is because in addition to the book telling you which stem  for your model number it also lets you look up stems by size. Or if there was a confusion you can look up by size and see which one it is.

pocket two.JPG

pocket one.JPG

bestfit stem measurements.JPG

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Hello, I am about 5 months into watchmaking and I love it!   The attention to precise detail is what really attracts me to it. (and the tools!) I am working on a 16 jewel 43mm pocket watch movement.   There are no markings besides a serial number (122248) .  The balance staff needs replacement. The roller side pivot broke off.  I successfully removed the hairspring using Bergeon 5430's.  I successfully removed the roller using Bergeon 2810.   Did i mention I love the tools?! I removed the staff from the balance wheel using a vintage K&D staff removal tool  with my Bergeon 15285 (that's the one that comes with a micrometer adjustment so it can be used as a jewel press as well as a traditional staking tool...it's sooooo cool...sorry..  can you tell i love the tools?) No more digressing..  I measured the damaged staff in all the relevant areas but I have to estimate on some because one of the pivots is missing. A = Full length  A= 4.80mm  (that's without the one pivot...if you assume that the missing pivot is the same length as the other pivot (I'm sure it's not)  then A = 5.12 mm...(can I assume 5.00mm here?) F=  Hair spring collet seat  F=  .89mm   (safe to assume .90 here? .. I am sure that my measurement's would at least contain  .01 mm error ?) G = balance wheel seat  G = 1.23 mm  (1.20mm?) H  =  roller staff  H =  .59mm  (.60 mm?) B  = bottom of the wheel to roller pivot   B  = 2.97mm  (3.00 mm?)     here I am estimating  again because this pivot is missing. So my friends, and I thank you profusely,  can you point me in the right direction as to how to proceed? Do i buy individual staffs?  or an assortment?   Since I don't know exactly the name of the manufacturer, will that be a fatal hindrance?   Tbh, I'm not even sure what country of origin this movement is. Thank you!    
    • Thats why i asked that question earlier, what happens if lubrication is placed directly on top of epilame ?  As opposed to walled within its non epilamed area . I'm not saying its right, i have no idea , just asking questions. 
    • thinking of where epilam should be removed did you know there was a patent that covers this? At least for the escapement I'm attaching it. GB1057607A-1 epilame.pdf
    • Back home...printing now.  Will report results
    • Oh well, if Master @nickelsilver says it's the way to go, then it is the way to go! I stand corrected! 🫡 Are there any other places where you're supposed to remove the epilame from the contact point of rubbing? I don't think so! Thanks for the effort @Neverenoughwatches, much appreciated! 🙂👍
×
×
  • Create New...