Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Similar Content

    • By peejaywk
      Hello,
          I'm new to the watch repair and came across the watch repair videos whilst browsing YouTube. I've been through the free introductary lessons and once I have some basic equipment in place I plan on subscribing to the level 1 course.
         I became intersetd in watch repair as I picked up a couple of non-running Ingersoll Triumph pocket watches and started to investigate how I could get them up and running again. Hopefully they will be running smoothly again soon.
       
      PeeJay
    • By Giannifive
      Hi all.  I have a question about the fragility of hairsprings.  I’m completely new to watch repair, and have started by regulating my mechanical watches (Seiko 7S26 and Orient F6922 movements).  While adjusting the rate with a wooden dowel oriented parallel to the balance wheel, I have accidentally lightly grazed the hairspring.  It was enough pressure to stop the balance wheel, but there appear to be no negative consequences.  Both watches keep great time and have good positional accuracy.  And according to my timegrapher the beat error and amplitude were not affected.
      So should I just chalk this up to good luck?  Or could there be lurking damage I’m not seeing?
       
    • By SteveT
      Hi guys,
      I'm Steve from Australia. I'm a complete n00b at this hobby but after stumbling across a few youtube videos, I found my way here. This looks like too much fun, to not have a go at my self. I have never pulled apart a watch movement before - the extent of my tinkering is putting the hands back on a watch that was dropped. I have always replaced my own watch batteries*, ever since I have ever owned a watch in my teenage years, I'm now 41. My back ground is in Electronics Engineering, I've been doing it since I joined the Navy at the age of 16, so I'm no stranger to pulling stuff apart, and soldering surface mount components. Although watch repair would be more fiddly I would imagine.
      So I guess my first question is, what project do I get my feet wet with?
      1.  a working pocket watch movement 
      2. try and fix a dead pocket watch 
      3. quartz watch working or not, is that easier than a mechanical?
      4. just a watch movement 
      5. dive right in and have a go at a simple mechanical (no date / calendar) 
      Looking on ebay it seams that even a dead watch is more expensive than a brand new cheap chinese mechanical watch (as low as $AUD 2, free shipping) .. It gives a whole new level to the old saying "As mad as a two bob watch!"
       
      * by batteries I really mean cells. By definition a battery is a collection of "voltaic cells" (joined together in a single case). The coin cells in a watch are single cells.
  • Recently Browsing

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • As I indicated above I did email the best pictures that I could see of all the pictures and I'm pasting the answer below. To really go beyond we need better pictures. Then the definition a better pictures is the impossible picture? There's a reference to the roller table which is totally invisible at all these pictures. In the early days of lever escapement's there are lots of variations of things. So the roller table located underneath everything engaging with the lever might have something clever. If your watchmaker with a loop it's easy enough to look in. Photographing that would be quite a challenge unless you knew exactly what you're doing. Then attempting to remove the balance wheel would not recommend unless you have experience with watches of this type. As because removing the balance bridge does not allow you to remove the balance wheel without underpinning the hairspring. Typically the hairsprings are pinned to the main plate. You will notice the reference to conversion to lever escapement. As technology changed the early movements would transition into newer movements. So basically they will take their older movements and start to add bits and pieces of newer technology on to them rather than making an entirely new watches.     As for the fusee, I really can't make out any details about the escapement from those poor photos. It looks like a standard lever escapement but it has a verge style balance cock. The case marks look like London, 1830. This would be way too early for a standard lever escapement. Perhaps it started out its life as a verge and was converted to a lever at a later date. I'm pretty sure that the signature is James McCabe - a well known and collectible watchmaker. It would be interesting to see more details of the roller table. This could, for example, be a Massey lever. Better pictures would help.
    • Thank you aac58😊👍🏻
    • Hi    according to the list its a 108   manufactured in 78.  manual attached.      cheers 108 (2).pdf
    • Thanks watchweasol. I've had another look and it says the following at the bottom of the dial: Great Britain "46562 10878" JerseyMo, the plucky little watch isn't done yet. The auto-winding is definitely working. I've been checking in on it periodically and giving it a shake. It's ticking away as it should and the date advances, even if it's running about 12-15 mins slow over roughly a 12 hour period. I've warmed to it for sure. The bean counters can't mark this one off their spreadsheet just yet. Hello again Poljot. Is the "sophisticated" click just a piece of bent metal engaging the teeth? I think I'll have to investigate further and report back, after I've cleaned the DNA and grime from around the case back before I open it!  
    • Good evening guys! So after work right behind watchmaking desk. I did exactly as I sad. Once I’ve put it together and tiny tweak, here is result from all mighty Weishi No 1000. Think I leave it that way. One more time thanks for all inputs. Cheers
×
×
  • Create New...