Jump to content

Enicar 1145b oscillating weigth problem


gary17

Recommended Posts

Hi

guys

Just putting a enicar sherpa back together before cleaning it and i am a piece missing. Its the part that holds the oscillating weight in place. Its not a screw and the nearest thing to it on the worksheet is called a oscillating weight nut. Cousins say there's no such part. The number on the enicar worksheet is 1145b/1506. So i am stuck does any one know the name of the part i need to attach the oscillating weight to the movement.

or another solution

Pic 1 shows the movement side. that hole is were the oscillating weight goes. ( note slight lip  just above jewel)

Pic 2 is the above shot of the attaching part of the oscillating weight as is pic 3

Pic 4 shows the underneath of the oscillating weight that goes into the hole in the movement. The reception hole is on pic also

And pic 5 i have no idea why that's there but once again its the underneath part of the oscillating weight

It appears to me you put the weight to the movement and then you insert a screw type thing that much catch the lip(the lip above the jewel in pic 1) and hold the weight in position. But what would you call it. There is no screw thread in the weight or movement side. Or you would be screwing into the jewel. Could it be the oscilating weight bolt??( which cousins don't have) I do not even have a decent pic of the part.

any advice appreciated. i am sure someone has worked on these before or come across something similar. And with a bit of luck remembers what the part is called.

cheers

gary

IMG_20201123_184156.jpg

IMG_20201123_184218.jpg

IMG_20201123_184221.jpg

IMG_20201123_184242.jpg

IMG_20201123_184246.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, gary17 said:

Cheers

poljot i searched 1143/1506. Just seen the small writing on the worksheet.

Much appreciated thanks

gary

Right, 1143 is Manual wind, 1145b is automatic. This explains why you were not able to find that nut under 1143.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The stud is also missing. There should be a stud sticking up from the bridge. Put in from the bottom and up thru the bridge. Not sure what number it has . But check enicar document on cousisnuk on  enicar 1145 The stud is called 1496 and the nut 1506

Edited by rogart63
Link to comment
Share on other sites



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I have read some suggestions that it can cause wear , particularly on the fork horns of a fully treated pallet fork. I've had half a kilo of steriac acid powder on a shelf for almost a year now, might have a little play today with a heater and a jar.  I think its because it gets into their cleaning solutions Mike. Theirs or anyone else's that services the watch next time, or if they need to strip back and rebuild. Could preclean but thats all time for a pro.
    • As I'm only cleaning watches in small numbers at home, I pre-clean any significant deposits of old grease and oil before using the cleaning solutions. I scrape off deposits with pegwood and Rodico, and if really dirty, wash parts in naphtha with a brush.  So I'm happy using DX, but can understand why it's avoided by the pros.
    • I think attaching a nut to the lid to pull it off is the least destructive, any damage damage on the outside is going to an easier fix than any created when trying to push it out from the inside. Scratching up the inside of the lid , mainspring or arbor bearing will be risk. Just my opinion.
    • yes the things we read in the universe I did see some where it was either difficult to clean off or it contaminated the cleaning fluid there was some issue with cleaning. I was trying to remember something about grease where as opposed to a substance of a specific consistency they were suggesting it had a base oil with something to thicken it. That conceivably could indicate that the two could separate and that would be an issue. But there is something else going on here that I had remembered so I have a link below and the description of the 9501 notice the word that I highlighted? Notice that word appears quite a bit on this particular page like 9415 has that property all so they 8200 mainspring grease and that definitely has to be mixed up when you go to use it because it definitely separates. just in case you didn't remember that nifty word there is a Wikipedia entry. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thixotropy   https://www.moebius-lubricants.ch/en/products/greases I wonder if what you're seeing is the boron nitride left behind after cleaning. In other words it's the high-pressure part of the grease and it's probably embedding itself into the metal which is why it doesn't clean off and shouldn't be a problem?
    • Yes and no. I use Moebius 9501 synthetic grease and it is significantly runnier than the Moebius 9504 synthetic grease (and I assume Molykote DX) that I previously used. I haven't seen 9504 spread and it is in my opinion the best grease money can buy. However, my current method of cleaning doesn't remove it from the parts, so that's why I have decided to use the 9501 instead. I believe I read somewhere that Molykote DX too is difficult to clean off. Thinking about it, I'm pretty sure my 9501 grease which expired in June 2022 is runnier now than it was when it was new, but whether new or old it always needs to be stirred before use. So, that's why I treat the parts of the keyless works, cannon pinion, etc. with epilame. That was very thoughtful of you and something that had completely passed me by. Not sure what the epilame will do when it wears off in a non-oiled hole. Anyone?
×
×
  • Create New...