Jump to content

Beat error problem


Recommended Posts

Slightly Bent pivot, cracked balance pivot jewel, too much side shake, hairspring coils sticking......It’s normal to see beat error and amp drop in the 4 positions other than DD and DU just because of gravity. But I would agree 8ms is a lot. Do you hear any galloping in the pallet or metal on metal sound when holding in that position. Problem could be in the escapement too. Hold it up to your ear and listen, move your head from side to upright and listen for a change in the tick. this how the old schoolers did it back in the day before all this fancy schmancy electrical equipment we use today. Lol I still do this even though I have a timegrapher.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If there's any extra sounds I would imagine the time grapher would display some rather dirty lines. But in my case there is one extremely clean line, and when I change over to a hanging position, the line separates into 2 very clean lines with the gap growing wider and wider until the beat error reads 8 or so.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ok this was on me. The beat error in the flat position was not in fact 0 but actually somewhere around 5 or 6.  I hadn't bothered to check the actual number and adjusted the beat error just looking at the lines. I hadn't thought about the possibility that I can make it so the lines can go off screen, appear on the opposite side, converge and give the illusion of perfect beat. Watch is now behaving normally after correcting this simple mistake. I spent the entire afternoon re-servicing the movement just to find this out.:fpc:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, CaptCalvin said:

Ok this was on me. The beat error in the flat position was not in fact 0 but actually somewhere around 5 or 6.  I hadn't bothered to check the actual number and adjusted the beat error just looking at the lines. I hadn't thought about the possibility that I can make it so the lines can go off screen, appear on the opposite side, converge and give the illusion of perfect beat. Watch is now behaving normally after correcting this simple mistake. I spent the entire afternoon re-servicing the movement just to find this out.:fpc:

Lol it happens. I def thought that was weird to go from 0-8 I would believe 5-8 though. Glad you figured it out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't suppose you want to give us a clue of how much amplitude you lost? Typically when amplitude goes superlow everything else flies out the window and is not a problem until you get the amplitude backup to at least 200°.

Then if you using the Chinese like the 1000 machine it has a rollover error so if you go past about 4 ms on the graphical display then graphically it's not going to look right you need to look at the numbers. We've discussed this somewhere else in the discussion group before several of us tried experiments. So this is why usually you want to go with the numbers they are usually right unless you go to an extreme and then they can rollover also although usually they just go to zeros

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, JohnR725 said:

I don't suppose you want to give us a clue of how much amplitude you lost? Typically when amplitude goes superlow everything else flies out the window and is not a problem until you get the amplitude backup to at least 200°.

Then if you using the Chinese like the 1000 machine it has a rollover error so if you go past about 4 ms on the graphical display then graphically it's not going to look right you need to look at the numbers. We've discussed this somewhere else in the discussion group before several of us tried experiments. So this is why usually you want to go with the numbers they are usually right unless you go to an extreme and then they can rollover also although usually they just go to zeros

 

I don't remember what it was but I'm pretty sure it was in the 250-280 range. Nothing that would be alarming.

39 minutes ago, oldhippy said:

Check the endshake. Then go all though the above what other members have suggested. 

It turned out to be a very simple mistake on my part as I have explained in my last post. There was nothing wrong with the movement.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, JohnR725 said:

I don't suppose you want to give us a clue of how much amplitude you lost? Typically when amplitude goes superlow everything else flies out the window and is not a problem until you get the amplitude backup to at least 200°.

Then if you using the Chinese like the 1000 machine it has a rollover error so if you go past about 4 ms on the graphical display then graphically it's not going to look right you need to look at the numbers. We've discussed this somewhere else in the discussion group before several of us tried experiments. So this is why usually you want to go with the numbers they are usually right unless you go to an extreme and then they can rollover also although usually they just go to zeros

 

This has caught me out before - one line had rolled over and looked to converge.  I use a Weishi 1000 Timegrapher.

Now I always do a visual check on the alignment of the impulse jewel with banking pins and pallet/escapement jewels whilst assembling the movement. I can usually get it within 1 ms that way.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, mikepilk said:

Now I always do a visual check on the alignment of the impulse jewel with banking pins and pallet/escapement jewels whilst assembling the movement. I can usually get it within 1 ms that way.

If everybody would do that they would save a lot of time on the timing machine. Seeing as how the modern watch with the floating stud if you only looking at the timing machine you can easily go right past where you're supposed to be a then ponder why the watch never goes in beat.

1000 timing machine is a great machine you just have to pay attention that the numbers agree with the display and visually agree with the watch.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 hours ago, CaptCalvin said:

If there's any extra sounds I would imagine the time grapher would display some rather dirty lines. 

Not really. I had a case of a pallet bridge slight rubbing and lines were quite straight but timing was unstable. Only listening and looking at the waveform helped in diagnosing the problem. The importance of doing that was pointed out to me by Master Mark.

Link to comment
Share on other sites



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • These types of hairsprings become weak with age and very fragile. Which I expect it is that giving you trouble, and that wheel is not the correct one, if it were not bent I don't think the movement would run as the teeth are not the correct height. The problem you have is price which depends on you. It can be repaired but is it worth it to you, because there is little value in the clock. A wheel can be made and hairspring replaced. Or hang on to it and keep looking on ebay which is your best bet for replacement parts or even a complete movement but it will be like finding a needle in a haystack. 
    • I did that also for a few movements - well, mainly in/around the train jewels. I made big efforts to epilame the mainplate WITHOUT getting Epilame into the Pallet fork jewels (where it's not supposed to be, right?). I made litte barriers with Rodico around that jewel and used drops from a syringe to apply on the rest.  However, I've now stopped doing this. For three reasons: 1. It's a hassle and consumes more of this liquid gold. 2. I didn't see the need when using HP1000/HP1300 lubricants and grease for most part. The two places where I'd use 9010 (i.e. escape wheel and balance) receive Epilame in specific places... or the cap-jewel-setting of the balance suspends the oil sufficiently be capillary action (see my "conflict" about using Epilame on the balance jewels).  3. Lastly, and here I really wonder about yours and others' experiences: I felt that applying Epliame to the train jewels left them looking hazy (borderline dirty) compared to the (painstakingly achieved) sparkly clean results of my cleaning process. I just can't help but think that the Epilame residuals would mix with the oil and cause more friction/wear. I don't know.    simple: it'll stay there. It won't move any further. That's exactly what is happening if you epilame a cap stone. You end up placing the 9010 right on top of the epilame and the oil will sit nicely on that spot.
    • There are some parts on Ebay for the seiko 6020A, it may just be a waiting game for someone to strip one down, NOS will be more scarce . K would strip your movement down to the module then start looking at other seiko movement to see if that coil is used, then seek out a seiko part dealer. Also Retrowatches youtube owner Mike may give you some advice try him on his site . He also hangs around amateur watchmaking groups.
    • I would agree, in order to work harden something you need to exceed it's yield strength when it moves from the elastic zone to the plastic zone and you get permanent deformation and work hardening which is fairly close to its failure point, relatively speaking and dependent on the material/alloy of course. In theory you can load something constantly within its elastic range and not suffer work hardening issues.
    • Probably easier to get a complete new movement - but CousinsUK list it as discontinued. Maybe someone on here knows a substitute movement ?
×
×
  • Create New...