Jump to content

Beat error problem


Recommended Posts

Slightly Bent pivot, cracked balance pivot jewel, too much side shake, hairspring coils sticking......It’s normal to see beat error and amp drop in the 4 positions other than DD and DU just because of gravity. But I would agree 8ms is a lot. Do you hear any galloping in the pallet or metal on metal sound when holding in that position. Problem could be in the escapement too. Hold it up to your ear and listen, move your head from side to upright and listen for a change in the tick. this how the old schoolers did it back in the day before all this fancy schmancy electrical equipment we use today. Lol I still do this even though I have a timegrapher.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If there's any extra sounds I would imagine the time grapher would display some rather dirty lines. But in my case there is one extremely clean line, and when I change over to a hanging position, the line separates into 2 very clean lines with the gap growing wider and wider until the beat error reads 8 or so.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ok this was on me. The beat error in the flat position was not in fact 0 but actually somewhere around 5 or 6.  I hadn't bothered to check the actual number and adjusted the beat error just looking at the lines. I hadn't thought about the possibility that I can make it so the lines can go off screen, appear on the opposite side, converge and give the illusion of perfect beat. Watch is now behaving normally after correcting this simple mistake. I spent the entire afternoon re-servicing the movement just to find this out.:fpc:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, CaptCalvin said:

Ok this was on me. The beat error in the flat position was not in fact 0 but actually somewhere around 5 or 6.  I hadn't bothered to check the actual number and adjusted the beat error just looking at the lines. I hadn't thought about the possibility that I can make it so the lines can go off screen, appear on the opposite side, converge and give the illusion of perfect beat. Watch is now behaving normally after correcting this simple mistake. I spent the entire afternoon re-servicing the movement just to find this out.:fpc:

Lol it happens. I def thought that was weird to go from 0-8 I would believe 5-8 though. Glad you figured it out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't suppose you want to give us a clue of how much amplitude you lost? Typically when amplitude goes superlow everything else flies out the window and is not a problem until you get the amplitude backup to at least 200°.

Then if you using the Chinese like the 1000 machine it has a rollover error so if you go past about 4 ms on the graphical display then graphically it's not going to look right you need to look at the numbers. We've discussed this somewhere else in the discussion group before several of us tried experiments. So this is why usually you want to go with the numbers they are usually right unless you go to an extreme and then they can rollover also although usually they just go to zeros

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, JohnR725 said:

I don't suppose you want to give us a clue of how much amplitude you lost? Typically when amplitude goes superlow everything else flies out the window and is not a problem until you get the amplitude backup to at least 200°.

Then if you using the Chinese like the 1000 machine it has a rollover error so if you go past about 4 ms on the graphical display then graphically it's not going to look right you need to look at the numbers. We've discussed this somewhere else in the discussion group before several of us tried experiments. So this is why usually you want to go with the numbers they are usually right unless you go to an extreme and then they can rollover also although usually they just go to zeros

 

I don't remember what it was but I'm pretty sure it was in the 250-280 range. Nothing that would be alarming.

39 minutes ago, oldhippy said:

Check the endshake. Then go all though the above what other members have suggested. 

It turned out to be a very simple mistake on my part as I have explained in my last post. There was nothing wrong with the movement.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, JohnR725 said:

I don't suppose you want to give us a clue of how much amplitude you lost? Typically when amplitude goes superlow everything else flies out the window and is not a problem until you get the amplitude backup to at least 200°.

Then if you using the Chinese like the 1000 machine it has a rollover error so if you go past about 4 ms on the graphical display then graphically it's not going to look right you need to look at the numbers. We've discussed this somewhere else in the discussion group before several of us tried experiments. So this is why usually you want to go with the numbers they are usually right unless you go to an extreme and then they can rollover also although usually they just go to zeros

 

This has caught me out before - one line had rolled over and looked to converge.  I use a Weishi 1000 Timegrapher.

Now I always do a visual check on the alignment of the impulse jewel with banking pins and pallet/escapement jewels whilst assembling the movement. I can usually get it within 1 ms that way.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, mikepilk said:

Now I always do a visual check on the alignment of the impulse jewel with banking pins and pallet/escapement jewels whilst assembling the movement. I can usually get it within 1 ms that way.

If everybody would do that they would save a lot of time on the timing machine. Seeing as how the modern watch with the floating stud if you only looking at the timing machine you can easily go right past where you're supposed to be a then ponder why the watch never goes in beat.

1000 timing machine is a great machine you just have to pay attention that the numbers agree with the display and visually agree with the watch.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 hours ago, CaptCalvin said:

If there's any extra sounds I would imagine the time grapher would display some rather dirty lines. 

Not really. I had a case of a pallet bridge slight rubbing and lines were quite straight but timing was unstable. Only listening and looking at the waveform helped in diagnosing the problem. The importance of doing that was pointed out to me by Master Mark.

Link to comment
Share on other sites



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Yeah ive watched that a few times before,  i couldnt find my old school dividers to scribe it up 😅 Yep thats the guy i bought a roll from .
    • Yes, "Sold out" is difficult to understand. There doesn't seem to be a lot going on. It's been nine months since any new video was published on the Watch Repair Channel. The Level 4 course on watchfix.com has been in progress for what feels like forever (several years!?). Maybe Mark's enterprises aren't doing well or perhaps already so profitable there's nothing much to motivate him for more material. Or, perhaps these days he's more into crochet. The real reason is probably something entirely different but it would be nice/interesting to know. I don't mean to sound gloomy or pessimistic, but I wouldn't be surprised to be met by an HTTP 404. Every day feels like a gift. Speaking of watchfix.com I've been postponing the "Level 5: Servicing Chronograph Watches" course for a very, very long time. Anyway, I just enrolled on it so it's going to be very interesting to see the videos. I must say, IMO there's nothing really that can compete with Mark's courses when it comes to presentation and video quality. It's simply world-class and makes me associate with some really expensive BBC productions.
    • Steel has some funny properties, or at least counterintuitive. The modulus of elasticity is effectively (not exactly, but close enough) the same for steel that is annealed and hardened. What changes is the point of plastic deformation* . If the movement of your spring doesn't pass that, it should work fine. It looks a little thick, I would thin it a bit maybe from the main body out about halfway, maybe 10-20% thinner (not in thickness, along its form). But if it works it works!   *So- if you have two bars of the same steel, one annealed, one at 600 Vickers (general hardness watch arbors might be), clamp them to a table so the same length is hanging out, and put a weight on the ends, they will bend the same amount. But if you continue to add weight, then remove it, at a point the annealed bar won't return to its original straightness. That's the point of plastic deformation. But up to that point, as springs, they are the same. However- their wear characteristics will be very very different. And getting the hardened bar past its point of plastic deformation takes a lot more effort.
    • @JohnR725 now that you've mentioned it. This is actually the second aftermarket spring (same place and brand) I ordered as the first one broke. The eye on which the arbor pulls on, broke off on the first spring after the first wind, and also it was a bit to large for the arbor. Looked like on one the second picture in the 2nd group. The second one was exactly the same, I had to bend it a bit, to give it a more prominent curve to the end of the spring so that the arbor catches the eye.  Also I believe both were 5-10mm shorter. Not that I writing that, I feel a bit dumb, as the spring might actually been the problem all along, although its advertised as a substitute to the original...     
    • The CS70 is the only one they show as annealed.  A further search on ebay, I found CS75 and CS100 annealed carbon steel strips  e.g. https://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/314072784422
×
×
  • Create New...