Jump to content

Pallet Fork Knocking The Bridge


Recommended Posts

Hi, was wondering if someone could help me. I have started to learn to service mainly Omega manual and automatic watches. I have serviced around 4 now and starting to get a feel for the basics (also passes level 1,2 and 3 along with a few level 4 videos) . However, i have an issue with a 564 calibre movement. The watch was working well until i laid my hands on it! i placed the pallet fork bridge onto of the pallet fork, however the fork is now hitting the bridge. I can see that both of the top and bottom pinions are fitted still. The jewel hole pivot doesn't seem to of been enlarged. Can anyone kindly advise please? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm not sure if i understand the problem right but the only way the pallet fork can hit the pallet bridge is if some of the pivots broke off, the fork isnt in the jewels, the jewels are gone or bad or one or two banking pins broke off.
Image3.thumb.jpg.cc0572b4d9ef6676c80ff92d4847681e.jpg

Edited by HSL
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just to make sure, you can see that both upper and lower pivots of the fork arbour are inside jewel holes, in which case the frok should jump from side to side, or dose the fork hit on the mainplate. If all is installed properly and fork still hit the banking pins, pallet must have moved somewhat outward in fork slots, shellac may have been lost during cleaning, or the fork is badly bent. Can you check the side shake on fork arbour, careful pivots break easy, you will find how easy once you break one. As said more data is needed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

From the few pictures I can find on the web, it honestly looks as if this movement does not rely on traditional banking pins. It looks as if the jeweled pivot is cut into a recess in the bridge so that the pallet rides up into the bridge itself. There is semicircular cutout that looks to perform the function of the banking pins. This is all conjecture without having one in hand or clear closeup photos. Check the bridge below for reference. The assembled movement is a screenshot, sorry it's out of focus, but hopefully you get the idea of my theory from these photos.

1218756464_s-l500(2).jpg.cf2e78ee6320566551ab41bd966e8144.jpg

20200421_075937.jpg.25d90278af45b28cf6a948d672c0be3d.jpg

Edited by FLwatchguy73
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, FLwatchguy73 said:

Finally found a pic of the bridge upside down, Now you can clearly see the cutaway and logically the points within the semicircular cutout that could perform the same function as banking pins.

Sometimes one read to fast and this pop into my mind too (when i read the question again) .. Here is one GPRS royalty free picture of it from me too..

IMG_20200421_175140.thumb.jpg.a7352c7e14160be1b0d884a89bd1155a.jpg

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • You need to know at least the basics. Then the questions that You ask will begin to make sense. From what is seen on the video, the gear train and escapement look fine, but the balance doesn't rotate free. I can suppose that the thin gold colored shim that must stay under the balance cock is not in place.
    • Yes, there are a lot of shapes and all of them are used in different cases. The one in Waltham A11 is one of the most spreaded and is what I have shown in the beginning. Of course, the radius of the final curve will depend on the distance between the hole in the stone and the regulator pins on the cock
    • I just found these. They don't really grab my eye at the moment, but having seen the change in some of the watches on here, before & after, the results have been pretty impressive. https://www.ebay.com.au/itm/196382906131?itmmeta=01HXBSJJXDB5J6H916ARJP9PHE&hash=item2db9555713:g:REwAAOSwUNdmOYAZ&itmprp=enc%3AAQAJAAAAwOAlUO3a1pAUX60Y8gUeXMPriraj5e7rkBNH2EA6cIUH7kb7hzoq6jRmOsYOQazk9R%2FteDESr1e50Asabv2tbJyDM%2FVODtmrAScFS4jPhHdgu6Jvt%2BFuRGBijpTkPl4NiK%2FDGr6qztc1Ujb33Tt6YdaUztOH9R1y9XJbwjH0puPDy8m0ilYcal7Vphcp7d59DLtBliNnbqfxfWhxdia2xMRyHYFHzR0Rg7NqB1z4xQGMZb73MAG4QBiF9FMkrII88Q%3D%3D|tkp%3ABk9SR_KuyvnqYw
    • I agree, it's getting harder and harder to find anything that meets the brief other than complete junk, or fake/frankenwatches. I would be in favor of raising the limit so people can continue to enjoy the challenge of resurrecting these low cost watches to their former glory and allowing the watchmaker the ability of practicing new skills without the worry of breaking the bank if all doesn't go to plan. Now all we need to do is settle on a value - maybe base the value on a standard currency so we are all playing by the same rules ($, £, €...?) Unless anyone minds I could start a poll and we could all vote on currency and value... let me know!
    • Same for me, but this is the first time I use the Bestfit. I understand that, for a 17-3/4 caliber, I have to consult page 150, but I can't find any resemblance. Thank you for all your research. I learn a little more each time I use this forum 😀
×
×
  • Create New...