Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I've been working on a DIY cleaning machine.  Ran my first movement through it tonight and it did a good job.  Parts came out clean and toasty dry.  Though, it was a new movement as my starting project, so the parts were pretty clean to begin with.  I'll next be running a vintage movement through it as a better cleaning test.

Here's a quick video of it in action, https://youtu.be/KrhK5E3GqVU

See photos below.

This is based on a lab stirring motor and controller unit.  Not perfect, but workable.  I used the timer on my phone instead of the one on the controller.  It is rated up to 3000 rpm.  I was trying to run at about 200-300 rpm, which is the speed knob barely on.  I would pull the basket up out of the liquid, but still in the jar, and spin at a faster rate to get out as much fluid before moving to the next station.

3D printed basket setup is originally from @muddtt with some minor tweaks that I made.  The jar brackets and dryer intake and exhaust parts were ones that I designed.  I used ABS plastic as it has good chemical and heat resistance.  STL files are available at https://www.thingiverse.com/thing:5905166.

The drying station is based on a 12V PTC car heater fan.  The brass mini baskets came out very toasty after about a 10 minute spin dry.  The plastic baskets showed no negative affect from the heat.  The 12V power supply does get pretty warm.  Fortunately, the dry cycle doesn't need to be long.  I only plug in the heater when that station needs to be used and then unplug (easier to rotate the turntable that way).

I got a small 12" x 12" sheet of aluminum from Home Depot and cut 3/4" wide strips to make baffles for the bottom of the jars.  The square-ish mason jars were helpful to keep those baffles from spinning, as long as you splay the fins out.  Hopefully, these are getting the water to circulate better through the basket layers.

I am a bit disappointed in the turntable.  At 14" in diameter, it is large enough to have a wash and 3 rinse stations.  The problem is the rotating base is such a small diameter that it is tipsy if not loaded evenly.  I'm looking at getting a bigger rotating base for just a few bucks.  You could go with a smaller turntable if you just want 2 rinse stations.

I have just under $200 into this setup.  Of course, you don't have to use a turntable (just manually swap out jars), or dryer station (use a hair dryer) to go even more budget.  If you don't have a 3D printer, you could mount a stainless mesh basket to the metal spindle that comes with the stirring motor (not used in my setup).

At some point, I would like to try an automated design.  Maybe repurpose a 3D printer.  For giggles, I was able to easily fit 3 mason jars and my drying station on my Ender 3's bed.  Mount a stirring motor to the X-Z axis gantry.  Maybe repurpose the hotend heater, thermocouple and fan to make a drying station.  3D printed brackets to hold the jars and drying station in place on the bed.  Arduino or Raspberry Pi to control it all.  Not sure if anyone is interested in collaborating on such a project.

61e9ZfXW+-L._AC_SL1500_.jpg

20230307_182128.jpg

20230311_172857.jpg

Edited by gpraceman
  • Like 7
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, RichardHarris123 said:

I think the jars would benefit from the addition of baffles to generate eddies in the fluid. 

I do have a star shaped baffle in the bottom of each jar.  You can see that in the video.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, RichardHarris123 said:

Baffles on the sides, the jars would have to be bigger though. 

That would be tough to do with these jars.  The bottom baffles do at least help break up the vortex, which should be inducing some turbulence.  Many of the vintage machines that I have seen have the bottom baffles.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, gpraceman said:

That would be tough to do with these jars.  The bottom baffles do at least help break up the vortex, which should be inducing some turbulence.  Many of the vintage machines that I have seen have the bottom baffles.

Interesting, I thought they reversed. That would be a good solution, software to slow/ stop the rotation and then reverse it. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, RichardHarris123 said:

Baffles on the sides, the jars would have to be bigger though.

Baffles on the size the jar come in two forms that I've seen. In one there is the star shaped thing on the bottom and one protruding arm of going up the side just to break up the fluid a little bit. Then on the modern elma  machines they have what looks like a peculiar Screen that looks peculiar but is doing the same thing let me see of him find a picture. Notice there is a band at the top of the mesh or whatever that is. And along the top there is a rectangular openings that's to tell you how full the fill the jar.

Amusements for cleaning machines over the years. For instance square jar versus round jar. Yes I've had people are heard people argue that a square jar means the fluid won't rotate and it will clean better. Then a course in around jar where you could actually get the fluid to spin conceivably with the item in the jar etc. So in addition to having a baffle there's other ways to deal with this. Like spinning a certain amount of time stopping and then going in the opposite direction I've seen cleaning machines do that. Then the cleaning machine that I got the images from the users manual I know someone who just purchased one and he was concerned because the motor didn't seem to be spinning quite right? At the slowest speed what he noticed was its pulsating. I think basically what is doing it spins and stops for just a moment and then it starts again. I'm guessing this is so that the fluid will flow better so when you stop the fluid will not stop and come through better that's another idea for this problem.

Then something I don't know about the little tiny baskets? I don't know what the propeller like thing how much up-and-down motion you're going to get. Because that would be the only way the fluid goes through the baskets in your case. They do make other baskets that are wire mesh and then they just have a top which is also mash you can get more fluid through them unfortunately there astronomically expensive brand-new. I must go attaching an image in fact everything in the pictures that I've attached is very expensive. Which of course is why we like our DIY stuff

cleaning machine jar with the insert.JPG

cleaning machine baskets elma.JPG

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, RichardHarris123 said:

Interesting, I thought they reversed. That would be a good solution, software to slow/ stop the rotation and then reverse it. 

Some machines will reverse direction.  I was going for a pretty bare bones setup.  There is a motor controller board that can be added to this system that can be programmed to reverse the motor after some time (and then back again), but that adds to the cost and the complexity.

3 minutes ago, JohnR725 said:

Baffles on the size the jar come in two forms that I've seen. In one there is the star shaped thing on the bottom and one protruding arm of going up the side just to break up the fluid a little bit. Then on the modern elma  machines they have what looks like a peculiar Screen that looks peculiar but is doing the same thing let me see of him find a picture. Notice there is a band at the top of the mesh or whatever that is. And along the top there is a rectangular openings that's to tell you how full the fill the jar.

Amusements for cleaning machines over the years. For instance square jar versus round jar. Yes I've had people are heard people argue that a square jar means the fluid won't rotate and it will clean better. Then a course in around jar where you could actually get the fluid to spin conceivably with the item in the jar etc. So in addition to having a baffle there's other ways to deal with this. Like spinning a certain amount of time stopping and then going in the opposite direction I've seen cleaning machines do that. Then the cleaning machine that I got the images from the users manual I know someone who just purchased one and he was concerned because the motor didn't seem to be spinning quite right? At the slowest speed what he noticed was its pulsating. I think basically what is doing it spins and stops for just a moment and then it starts again. I'm guessing this is so that the fluid will flow better so when you stop the fluid will not stop and come through better that's another idea for this problem.

Then something I don't know about the little tiny baskets? I don't know what the propeller like thing how much up-and-down motion you're going to get. Because that would be the only way the fluid goes through the baskets in your case. They do make other baskets that are wire mesh and then they just have a top which is also mash you can get more fluid through them unfortunately there astronomically expensive brand-new. I must go attaching an image in fact everything in the pictures that I've attached is very expensive. Which of course is why we like our DIY stuff

cleaning machine jar with the insert.JPG

cleaning machine baskets elma.JPG

Hmm.  I wonder if I could some up with something 3D printed for the side of the jar.  I'd have to think on that one.  It would be difficult to insert something like that into the jar (like assembling a ship in a bottle).

I did try with and without the bottom baffle and the baffle did reduce how far up the jar sides that the liquid would climb, so it does seem to be doing some whirlpool busting.

I do think the propeller vanes on the lid are forcing liquid through the basket.  As those are directional, reversing the motor may not be too effective, other than making some brief turbulence.

8 minutes ago, RichardHarris123 said:

Stir the liquid instead of the basket?

Screenshot_20230320_202044_Chrome.jpg

I've seen such a stirrer discussed and people were not liking the magnetic issue when it comes to watch parts.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, RichardHarris123 said:

We need to model the fluid dynamics to find the optimum arrangement.  Without suitable software, we would have to rely on empirical evidence. 

Unfortunately, Computational Fluid Dynamics was not a course that I did well in for my Aerospace Engineering degree.  That and I forgot all of the formulas from all those years ago.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, gpraceman said:

Unfortunately, Computational Fluid Dynamics was not a course that I did well in for my Aerospace Engineering degree.  That and I forgot all of the formulas from all those years ago.

I have a degree in chemical engineering, I've forgotten most of the formulae too but they wouldn't help us.  A model or experiment is the only option.  The problem with experimentation is we would require standardised items to clean, to compare the results.  Probably more difficult than the fluid dynamics.  We would also need holes in the samples to represent jewels etc.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 3/21/2023 at 12:35 AM, RichardHarris123 said:

We need to model the fluid dynamics to find the optimum arrangement.  Without suitable software, we would have to rely on empirical evidence. 

Ha ha - I remember an old professor saying that when he died he is going to ask God to explain 2 things, the first is quantum mechanics, and the second is CFD.... he said he was  hopeful about the first, but not the second.

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I imagine the baskets spinning back and forth in the jar is so chaotic that a CFD model isn't going to tell you much about the differences.

Experimental results seems better.  But how to get standardized dirty parts and then get an empirical evaluation of how clean they got?

Maybe use a proxy for cleaning.  Some kind of pill, that dissolves in water or a cleaning solution, but not too fast.  Probably lots of existing things that do this.  Sugar cube or pearl sugar?  Salt tablet?  Calcium Carbonate pill (.e.g Tums)?

Mass them before and after.  Probably need do that dry.  The more mass lost, the better it was "cleaned".

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, xyzzy said:

But how to get standardized dirty parts and then get an empirical evaluation of how clean they got?

Maybe somebody's already thought of the problem?

Notice at the link below where they have technical documentation. Under the freedom machine is a reference to an Omega cleaning. In other words there proud to say that their machine can clean as well as Omega Is specifying.

http://lititzpp.com/documentation.php

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I can share something I found when I was building my cleaning machine, about the effects of baffles and fluid dynamics pictures.

Myself use the star shape baffles like @gpracemandid, it works well.

With keywords you can find a bunch of videos on youtube, two videos you can take a look about how it works: 

 

 

S__47423495.thumb.jpg.92d27d15e138d55449683f85442e45c9.jpg

S__47423497.thumb.jpg.5c844639ede40f4539d97aa1c3d01c1c.jpg

Edited by Trey
  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Very informative thread! After reading through, I ordered a lamp from Amazon. Under $49 US (£39) tax shipping and delivered in 6 hours, yep! This one has 5 intensity levels and 5 color settings from 3200 to 6500. I use a binocular microscope and have the gooseneck lamp in case I need directional light. Don't mind the clutter of watches, those are usually moved off the bench when working on a watch. This really lights up the area nicely. The ring of leds on the binoculars is fairly cool when compared to the new lamp. I like it because once set it returns back to the setting when turned off and back on again.
    • So fsr as assembly, I don't think you would find 5646 different from 5606, just that GS is 36000 beater. No unknown chalange is there as long as the escapement reamins undameged. Rgda
    • no, I have no alternatives and don't know of any. I've bought Mobius and that's all I have. 9010, 9104, 941, D5, 8000 and Moly-Kote.
    • I've just had the wood stove door seal replaced. I was hoping not to need to do that again for a few years. In the name of science I can't say I'm not tempted. I mean how dangerous can it be? Says the man who encouraged his friend the plumber to use phosphoric acid to dislodge the solidified sodium hydroxide that had blocked the bath U bend. We did take that outside first though, and yes, adding concentrated phosphoric acid to sodium hydroxide crystals and drain sludge is as bad an idea as it sounds.. so we did it several times, laughing like delinquent school boys until the explosions of brown goop stopped. The operation was a success, but sadly the patient died (or rather, melted), and we had to replace the U bend anyway.  Children, please don't try this at home.
    • I don't usually fancy the yellow crystals but it seems to work with that dial... ...and you can't set fire to it unless you share video. I speak for all of us...
×
×
  • Create New...