Jump to content

Gucci 9300


Dylan123

Recommended Posts

Hello there, I have recently acquired a gucci 9300 watch. It's a chronograph and as far as I can see looks akin to other pictures of this watch on the internet. None of the hands are moving however I think that  this Is due to the fact that it hasn't been worn/serviced/touched for a few years. I have purchased a watch repair kit and am thinking of replacing the battery and maybe adjusting the links. Any advice on this, what battery to use, things to look out for ect. 

Any help greatly appreciated thanks for your time,

Dylan.

15802471240376143743569710015716.jpg

15802471464391708073662901589794.jpg

15802471772014888296664066406352.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, Dylan123 said:

Any advice on this, what battery to use, things to look out for ect. 

Any first brand battery is fine. Being it a quartz watches there are chances that it will not work anyway due to the module being faulty. Work carefully to not lose or damage parts. There is many many videos you can watch on the internet. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, Dylan123 said:

Do you know what type of battery?

Begin by opening it (ideal for beginners is a lever-type snap case back opener). You may also need a small press to close it. Then identify the battery which is easy to obtain at electronic stores or even online. If the time and cost associated with the above is excessive then I recommend that you continue having a watch shop to do that for you.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi Dylan one can only second the advise given by jdm , the only way to find the battery type is to open the watch,  check the battery terminals for corrosion, A green crystaline deposit. If the watch has been stored with the battery in there is always the possibility of it leaking due to age.      All the best

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I have read some suggestions that it can cause wear , particularly on the fork horns of a fully treated pallet fork. I've had half a kilo of steriac acid powder on a shelf for almost a year now, might have a little play today with a heater and a jar. 
    • As I'm only cleaning watches in small numbers at home, I pre-clean any significant deposits of old grease and oil before using the cleaning solutions. I scrape off deposits with pegwood and Rodico, and if really dirty, wash parts in naphtha with a brush.  So I'm happy using DX, but can understand why it's avoided by the pros.
    • I think attaching a nut to the lid to pull it off is the least destructive, any damage damage on the outside is going to an easier fix than any created when trying to push it out from the inside. Scratching up the inside of the lid , mainspring or arbor bearing will be risk. Just my opinion.
    • yes the things we read in the universe I did see some where it was either difficult to clean off or it contaminated the cleaning fluid there was some issue with cleaning. I was trying to remember something about grease where as opposed to a substance of a specific consistency they were suggesting it had a base oil with something to thicken it. That conceivably could indicate that the two could separate and that would be an issue. But there is something else going on here that I had remembered so I have a link below and the description of the 9501 notice the word that I highlighted? Notice that word appears quite a bit on this particular page like 9415 has that property all so they 8200 mainspring grease and that definitely has to be mixed up when you go to use it because it definitely separates. just in case you didn't remember that nifty word there is a Wikipedia entry. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thixotropy   https://www.moebius-lubricants.ch/en/products/greases I wonder if what you're seeing is the boron nitride left behind after cleaning. In other words it's the high-pressure part of the grease and it's probably embedding itself into the metal which is why it doesn't clean off and shouldn't be a problem?
    • Yes and no. I use Moebius 9501 synthetic grease and it is significantly runnier than the Moebius 9504 synthetic grease (and I assume Molykote DX) that I previously used. I haven't seen 9504 spread and it is in my opinion the best grease money can buy. However, my current method of cleaning doesn't remove it from the parts, so that's why I have decided to use the 9501 instead. I believe I read somewhere that Molykote DX too is difficult to clean off. Thinking about it, I'm pretty sure my 9501 grease which expired in June 2022 is runnier now than it was when it was new, but whether new or old it always needs to be stirred before use. So, that's why I treat the parts of the keyless works, cannon pinion, etc. with epilame. That was very thoughtful of you and something that had completely passed me by. Not sure what the epilame will do when it wears off in a non-oiled hole. Anyone?
×
×
  • Create New...