Jump to content

Deviations on timegrapher measurements


Darak

Recommended Posts

2 hours ago, CaptCalvin said:

@jdm What he means is that he needed to fully open the regulating index for the slot at the bottom to line up with the hairspring in order for the hairspring to come free of the regulator index.

Well, as mentioned above that is not needed. What is moved is the entire regulator arm, but not the index.
From the Technical Guide:

remove-HS.thumb.PNG.ac3ea1b8b30f4d60d8b9657ef7b76e77.PNG

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I wanted to add that removing and (even more) installing this type of hairsprings is a delicate task.

So the OP as a beginner did well in doing that without damage, no matter the exact steps he followed. 

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, jdm said:

Well, as mentioned above that is not needed. What is moved is the entire regulator arm, but not the index.
From the Technical Guide:

remove-HS.thumb.PNG.ac3ea1b8b30f4d60d8b9657ef7b76e77.PNG

I would say it's pretty needed, especially on the reinstall. Think about how difficult it would be to try to get the endcurve back through the slot if it was turned. The manual shows it fully opened in all steps. I think it just neglected to specify. Kudos to OP for taking this initiative.

Edited by CaptCalvin
Link to comment
Share on other sites

That is quite a new concept, "practice on fine pieces because the cheap one may get you disappointed"? 

The focus in learning should be about developing dexterity, using the correct techniques and fully understand how parts typically function and behave when manipulated. Not going for quick satisfying results on valuable pieces.

So, my vote goes to getting cheap old Swiss, or Seiko, or new Chinese, depending on student's preferences. 

To this effect the OP going to his own nice watches right away has been a risk taking, but so far he managed to do good. I'd recommend anyway he gets a neglected Seiko 5 to further practice, simply because skill developing is based on repetition, and repeated manipulation is detrimental to a mov.t.

Ok. Such is democracy we each have our thoughts opinions and are entitled to voice them.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites


"Don’t waste time trying to learn on cheap movements", I heard you, but I'm very new to this watchmaking hobby, even I can do very very tiny electronic SMD hand soldering, it doesn't mean I want to risk myself or a friend expensive timepiece, still need to train my dexterity ,new techniques and confidence
 
DarakC0376ACE-A469-4C28-AFCC-7FD5843A4A62.thumb.jpeg.d4e9c3b7500feaefcf3c55e1931a82f3.jpeg


Hello Darak, apologies for taking a while to respond to you, I have been away working. I was very lucky to have met a professional Horologist who lives near to me and spares time for me to learn from him. Prior to meeting this gentleman I spent 4 years as a self taught diy Horologist tinkering with cheap or dysfunctional movements I bought off eBay, usually £1 to £3 a pop. Yes, they taught me manual dexterity and manipulation of parts, I even managed to reform a few damaged hairsprings, to a degree. The best advice I was given by the professional Horologist , (and hence I passed it onto you) was to learn on movements of quality, ones which are runners.

JDMs response is I hope purely flippant. Of course most would not interpret my advice as “all newbies should start by only tearing down fine omega or Rolex time pieces”.

It is possible to find working, albeit uncased ETA or AS movements for example on eBay for as little as £5 to £10. The movement should be running beforehand. Stripping, cleaning, rebuilding and lubricating a non running watch yields no lessons learned or sense of achievement if the movement still turns out to be a non runner. I have learned horology is a journey and not a destination, and for me it was important to gain confidence through success.

Kind regards
Deggsie


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
11
6 minutes ago, Deggsie said:

Hello Darak, apologies for taking a while to respond to you, I have been away working. I was very lucky to have met a professional Horologist who lives near to me and spares time for me to learn from him. Prior to meeting this gentleman I spent 4 years as a self taught diy Horologist tinkering with cheap or dysfunctional movements I bought off eBay, usually £1 to £3 a pop. Yes, they taught me manual dexterity and manipulation of parts, I even managed to reform a few damaged hairsprings, to a degree. The best advice I was given by the professional Horologist , (and hence I passed it onto you) was to learn on movements of quality, ones which are runners.

JDMs response is I hope purely flippant. Of course most would not interpret my advice as “all newbies should start by only tearing down fine omega or Rolex time pieces”.

It is possible to find working, albeit uncased ETA or AS movements for example on eBay for as little as £5 to £10. The movement should be running beforehand. Stripping, cleaning, rebuilding and lubricating a non running watch yields no lessons learned or sense of achievement if the movement still turns out to be a non runner. I have learned horology is a journey and not a destination, and for me it was important to gain confidence through success.

Kind regards
Deggsie


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

Hi Deggsie,

 

Thanks for your kind reply, I'm very jealous that you have someone can learn from, I'm learning by watching YouTube videos or community like here,  but still, I think I learn a lot good tips so far.

 

Darak

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Don’t be jealous. My trainer keeps saying how it is important to make mistakes... that’s how you learn. But I wasn’t learning by practicing on broken cheap movements. [emoji53] Also he keeps saying don’t rush to be successful. Horology takes a lifetime to learn.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 4/18/2019 at 6:46 AM, Darak said:

And yes, I always measure in six positions, and every time I change positions, I'll take it off and move the watch around, but this makes me think, some watchmaker uses auto timegrapher, means the timegrapher will move between positions by itself, does this means take the watch off and move it around is not necessary? 

Is not necessary, just wait 30 seconds between positions.

 

On 4/29/2019 at 11:59 PM, Deggsie said:

It is possible to find working, albeit uncased ETA or AS movements for example on eBay for as little as £5 to £10. The movement should be running beforehand.

Actually I don't think that's so easy to find these cheap as you say. If you want to show things to other member feel free to post links, that is absolutely allowed by forum rules as long isn't your sale. 

Incidentally the OP here, like many others, like Seiko. From what Darak posted so far I'd say that he's finding his way pretty good. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Mark keeps a close eye on his forum. I'm sure if you asked him he will reply, he might not do it right away but you will receive his answer.  
    • I kind of think the same, the surface under the oil is the same as the surface around the oil. Can epilame both repel and attract , that doesn't quite make sense in simple terms, but is it more complicated than that.
    • I agree with @JohnR725. Oil on an epilamed surface is essentially the same as water on a waxed surface. The same physical properties are at work (surface tension vs. adhesion). 
    • I think we all get a lot out of this group, and it has been pivotal in my development by the sharing of knowledge, experience and learning from more seasoned experts such as @JohnR725 and others (you know who you are!) as well as fellow novices. I think that having a backup communication plan in reserve so that if there is a future problem just makes good sense. I don't think anyone is trying to undermine the forum, but if something unthinkable happens, like the Ranfft website for example, then it would be good if those who are willing can still keep in contact. Speaking personally, and I know I risk a charge of heresy, it would be good if Mark could be a little more visible in this forum, and maybe give any insight from time to time on the future/progress of forum and instructional videos etc. even if its just to confirm the status quo. I appreciate he is a busy man with a full time job, but so are most of the rest of us and to post a few lines every now and then shouldn't be too much to ask to reassure the restless villagers. Best outcome for me would be a message saying something along the lines of: "Hi guys, all good, no planned changes... enjoy the forum, will message again next month!" Just my two cents.
    • A nice looking watch !! Did you try 9010, instead of the 9415, on the pallet jewels / escape wheel? And if you did, did you notice a difference?
×
×
  • Create New...