Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I have a nice old Elgin 7j (Model 291) pocket watch which I've just resurrected.  It's running a little fast and possibly the reason is that upper bushing for the escape wheel is a little bit egged.  I'm going to have to replace it.  The question is how?  Should I find a jewel which fits and make a setting?  Or should I make a brass bushing.  I say brass because the original bushing is just the plate itself and so is plated brass.  The lower bushing looks fine.  Should it be replaced too?  Any suggestions?

P1030316.JPG

Posted

i sugest replacing the mvt..in the old days,when men wore the watch in a vest pocket,,  that is what they did.  the case is very nice.   vin

Posted
9 hours ago, vinn3 said:

i sugest replacing the mvt..in the old days,when men wore the watch in a vest pocket,,  that is what they did.  the case is very nice.   vin

It is a nice case.  A "fold out".  I've been refurbishing it.  It's got a plastic crystal which I think I'll replace with a vintage glass one.  As for replacing the movement itself, I'd be interested in upgrading the quality if I can find one.  Not sure which Elgin 16s movements will fit in the case.  Naturally if I do repair it I know I'll never get back the investment of time.  I do them largely to practice my skills.  I could re-jewel it but I think I'll practice turning a bushing instead.  I can see already that the movement is very forgiving.  The escape wheel pivot hole is pretty egged.  I put it together and let it run for a day and it kept time--not great but surprising, nonetheless.  Re-bushing will probably reduce the positional errors somewhat; though I'm not very experience in this area.  Thanks for your comment.  Doug

Posted
9 hours ago, watchweasol said:

Hi   If you are going to repair the watch I should use a brass bush as that keeps the watches integrity, thats what the old guys would have done.

I think you're right.  I need to practice my lathe skills anyway so I'll give a try at turning a bushing.  Thanks for the comment.  Doug

Posted

A bushing will be fine. What will be tricky is getting the hole open large enough for one without drifting its position. The best way to do it would be in a faceplate using a cross slide to bore the hole. Lacking that, you can  drill it, smaller than desired, and correct any error in concentricity with a round file comparing with the original oil sink. You'd want to be close to the edge of the oil sink by now, and can now ream it out with a jeweling tool and turn up your bushing to fit. As it's the upper hole, it's quite a ways away from the wheel itself so a small error in placement won't have much effect if any. It's way more critical on the lower one which is right next to the wheel.

  • Thanks 1
Posted
18 hours ago, watchweasol said:

Hi   If you are going to repair the watch I should use a brass bush as that keeps the watches integrity, thats what the old guys would have done.

    the "old guys would go to the jeweler" and have a NEW movement installed.  now there are no new mvts.!  i have my grand father's pocket watch.  vin

Posted
9 hours ago, DouglasSkinner said:

It is a nice case.  A "fold out".  I've been refurbishing it.  It's got a plastic crystal which I think I'll replace with a vintage glass one.  As for replacing the movement itself, I'd be interested in upgrading the quality if I can find one.  Not sure which Elgin 16s movements will fit in the case.  Naturally if I do repair it I know I'll never get back the investment of time.  I do them largely to practice my skills.  I could re-jewel it but I think I'll practice turning a bushing instead.  I can see already that the movement is very forgiving.  The escape wheel pivot hole is pretty egged.  I put it together and let it run for a day and it kept time--not great but surprising, nonetheless.  Re-bushing will probably reduce the positional errors somewhat; though I'm not very experience in this area.  Thanks for your comment.  Doug

   there are many used mvts. out there.  elgin had a 21 jewel one in their "rail road watch"  would fit in your warch. vin

  • Like 1
Posted

Regardless, something has to be done about that bushing. You aren't doing that movement any favors in running it that way. Egg shaped holes mean misaligned shafts, misaligned shafts mean misaligned gears, and a cascade of new problems.

  • Like 1
Posted
37 minutes ago, yankeedog said:

Regardless, something has to be done about that bushing. You aren't doing that movement any favors in running it that way. Egg shaped holes mean misaligned shafts, misaligned shafts mean misaligned gears, and a cascade of new problems.

You're absolutely right!  I just let it run a short while.  It's now disassembled and I'm making ready for repair.  

Posted
7 hours ago, nickelsilver said:

A bushing will be fine. What will be tricky is getting the hole open large enough for one without drifting its position. The best way to do it would be in a faceplate using a cross slide to bore the hole. Lacking that, you can  drill it, smaller than desired, and correct any error in concentricity with a round file comparing with the original oil sink. You'd want to be close to the edge of the oil sink by now, and can now ream it out with a jeweling tool and turn up your bushing to fit. As it's the upper hole, it's quite a ways away from the wheel itself so a small error in placement won't have much effect if any. It's way more critical on the lower one which is right next to the wheel.

Thanks!  I'm not experienced enough to envision how to use a faceplate and cross slide to bore the hole.  Do you have any pictures so I can see how it works?  I have a Seitz jeweliing tool and I was just going to use one of the reamers to bore out the hole in the plate.  I've measured the diameter and think a number 230 reamer will work (actually 2.99 mm).  I plan to turn down some brass stock to 2.30 mm.  Then I plan to drill a hole (size 24 as near as I can tell) a little undersized.  Measuring the thickness of the plate will tell me how thick the bushing needs to be and I'll part it at that thickness.  For me the tricky part will be fitting it into the hole.  I'll need to get the outside diameter right so I won't have either a loose or overly tight fit--my lathe skills aren't all that great so I may have to make several attempts.  Then I plan to use a small broach to bring the hole to the proper diameter.  Check for end shake and side shake.  Spin it in place and then in train with the other wheels.  If it spins okay and all looks properly righted I assume it will be okay.  How does that sound?  Thanks again!  Doug

Posted

Hi   Lacking a lathe or bushing tool that sounds ok  just take great care in getting the hole  round and vertical. It is always stated in the books to work from the reverse side when bushing as the broaches/reamers are  tapered therefore when the bush is pressed in its a tight fit. I bush clocks by hand after drilling out the plate using a drill press undersized then finish with a broach. The bush should be level with the front plate and countersunk for an oil sink, any finishing done on the reverse side, patience and care are the watch words here.  Spinning it in place with its adjacent wheel and checking for depth and freedom before fitting the rest of the train is a must.



  • Similar Content

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I must be going nuts !! I checked the parts list to get a part number and see that there is no screw shown. Only a rotor assembly. I checked the rotor I removed and the screw is part of the assembly. What a stupid error Regards to all, Dave
    • This would have been seen before the fork and balance were even fitted if you carried out a test on the train wheel as a matter of course.  
    • With the amphibia there's also the gasket in the screw-in crown. If memory serves a correct seal for the back of the case is tricky to find as well, but maybe that's because mine are vintage. The newer cases are larger I think. 
    • As others have pointed out we discussed this subject in great lengths multiple times on multiple discussion groups. Then we have a subject that has too many variables and generalizations that make all the different things seem like one common removing staffs when it's not. There are variety of balance wheels specifically designed to be hard enough to withstand knocking or pushing a staff out. Rolex has one that the only way the staff is coming out is by pushing it out enough pressure is applied the river breaks with a very satisfying pop. This is because they hairspring cannot be removed until the staff is pushed out through. Then of course Rolex has a nice set of tools just for this purpose. A variety watch companies like Elgin made a balance wheels specifically designed to be hard enough to withstand knocking the staff have. For instance that principle is applied with jeweling tool you mention and here's the complete article down below that explains the procedure. Then of course there are variety watch companies Elgin And Hamilton that specifically designed balance staffs designed to be knocked out because the riveting shoulder is supposed to break. That of course would be the original staffs and probably the aftermarket do not have such features.   One of the problems with all of these tools would be the balance staff itself and of course whatever the balance wheel is made of. Personally I like the rule of if you're knocking the staff out and you gently tap with the hammer and it doesn't just pop out then you do not drive it out you do have to use a lathe. Because for variety of reasons staffs that are perhaps over riveted not quite the right size soft balance arms etc. driving a staff out that doesn't really want to come out it's not your best interest to do that.   A variety of American companies used friction fit staffs. For instance here's an example of Waltham Here's something interesting from Hamilton a specific type of 992 with a specific type of hairspring. Normally the Hamilton friction staff's do not have a groove to indicate such. Such as the Hamilton 992B or the Hamilton deck watch but they only have one staff which is friction. This particular staff has been marked because if you read carefully I suspect originally it might not have had a friction staff this was basically an upgrade. I know I've seen in the staffing assortments the blued hubs as a replacement components.    Then I'm attaching a PDF of Hamilton's thoughts on replacing balance staffs. Notice either the hub where the river can be cut away they don't have a preference it's whatever you like. Plus they mention the staff that is designed to break away. Although I have a suspicion you'll probably never see one of those as it would have to be an original staff and I suspect none of the after markets would have that feature. Hamilton technical data number 129 replacement of broken balance staffs.pdf
    • Thanks for shedding light on the exact problem — you're right, it's the centre tube, not the cannon pinion. That was the issue, and after tightening the centre tube, everything now sits correctly. The train bridge can be fully tightened and all the wheels run freely. I haven’t tested the pallet fork yet as I haven’t refitted it, but I’ll be doing that shortly to confirm if the issue is entirely resolved. @Neverenoughwatches Sorry for misusing the term earlier.
×
×
  • Create New...