Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

While we are on the subject - It reminded of the my one radium watch, my Universal Geneve cal 267.  I've always wondered about how (and where) to store it. I had it sealed in plastic bag to contain the radon. But then I read about how that leads to contamination of all the contents by daughter decay elements. 😟

This morning I decided to remove the radium to make the watch more safely storable and wearable.  As usual, it came off easily with a wet bud.

I happen to have an old scrap spare dial from a cal 267, and found (under  microscope using a fine oiler) I could easily apply luminova to the numbers to look at least as good as the original. 

So my question is - What colour should I use. What was the original colour of radium paint? 

image.png.460343fdd078da42e75b02fccc40411e.png

Edited by mikepilk
Posted
  On 6/5/2024 at 2:59 PM, mikepilk said:

So my question is - What colour should I use. What was the original colour of radium paint? 

Expand  

I've got a bit of a collection of NOS vintage radium hands in pristine condition and they have a very mat dull lime green/yellow colour to them. I've tried taking photos of them, but the colour doesn't really show properly in them! They look more white in the photos, which they're not.

I tinted the second photo to get the colour of the lume right, although it all depends on your screen. The hand in the middle and at the top is the most like the colour

IMG_20240605_162445901.thumb.jpg.42552fa93326787f3d6aba987089957c.jpg

IMG_20240605_162255055_HDR.thumb.jpg.0c3369431fbc7f7b1f2badbc5aee0dc7.jpg

  • Like 1
Posted

Thanks, that's really useful @Jon.

The green lume I have looks pretty close to that. I have ordered some vintage tinting paste. I'll try the basic green with just a hint of the tinting paste to tone it down a touch. 

BTW  I like the burn marks left on the card by the hands 😯

  • Like 3
Posted

My student brought in his Geiger counter the other day and I put the tray of radium hands under it and the clicking got to a continuous crackle and some pretty high readings. That level of radiation is only problematic at close proximity. It's more the radon and breathing in dust when working with them that is the problem.

Radium exposure.pdfFetching info...

  On 6/5/2024 at 3:48 PM, mikepilk said:

BTW  I like the burn marks left on the card by the hands 

Expand  

Yeah, interesting effect of the radiation on the card. You get it on vintage watches that haven't been used in many years with a faint mark where the hand was

  On 6/5/2024 at 3:48 PM, mikepilk said:

I have ordered some vintage tinting paste

Expand  

Where do you get that from?

Posted

I'm probably over cautious when removing radium. I cover the work area with cling film and wear latex gloves and an N95 mask. All the disposables I use (cling film, gloves, buds, tissue, water, which I soak up with kitchen roll) get bagged in ziplock bag and binned.

I bought a "Pocket Geiger" a few years ago (they were developed for Fukushima) which plugs in to mobile and has an app. It only detects gamma, but It seems quite sensitive. 

  On 6/5/2024 at 3:55 PM, Jon said:

Where do you get that from?

Expand  

ebay

image.thumb.png.182fc33e610004a7750e62fcf4a67dc8.png

Posted
  On 6/5/2024 at 4:06 PM, mikepilk said:

I'm probably over cautious when removing radium. I cover the work area with cling film and wear latex gloves and an N95 mask. All the disposables I use (cling film, gloves, buds, tissue, water, which I soak up with kitchen roll) get bagged in ziplock bag and binned

Expand  

I do the same. There is no being too careful!

 

  On 6/5/2024 at 6:56 PM, Neverenoughwatches said:

Have you tried this trick with adding tea or coffee to colour lume Jon ?

Expand  

Yes, the results were not good. Using a water based organic material such as coffee with a solvent based lume is a recipe that ain't gonna work in my book. It is counterintuitive. I use various powder pigments to dull down the colour with the lume. Thanks for the link to the pigment you use @mikepilk

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Posted
  On 6/5/2024 at 7:08 PM, Jon said:

I do the same. There is no being too careful!

 

Yes, the results were not good. Using a water based organic material such as coffee with a solvent based lume is a recipe that ain't gonna work in my book. It is counterintuitive. I use various powder pigments to dull down the colour with the lume. Thanks for the link to the pigment you use @mikepilk

Expand  

Thats another strike for the youtubers then, thats where i had heard about it.

  • Haha 1
Posted
  On 6/5/2024 at 3:38 PM, Jon said:

NOS vintage radium hands

Expand  

One of the things that I find interesting with a vintage new old stock hands still mounted in the paper is the effect of the radium on the paper. In the image I snipped out you urge you can see it but maybe it's the lighting because usually the paper looks much more brown if it's been under radium hand it has a nice light burnt look.

image.png.81b6877a5ad3f0863d6a733af7b03a87.png

 

  • Like 1
Posted

NOS radium lume that has been protected from moisture/humidity is much greener than I would have expected, based on some well-wrapped example hand cards I’ve come across. Very similar to 1st generation “cold” lume and other glow-in-the-dark items from the 70’s and 80’s.

  • Like 1
Posted
  On 6/5/2024 at 8:12 PM, JohnR725 said:

One of the things that I find interesting with a vintage new old stock hands still mounted in the paper is the effect of the radium on the paper. In the image I snipped out you urge you can see it but maybe it's the lighting because usually the paper looks much more brown if it's been under radium hand it has a nice light burnt look.

image.png.81b6877a5ad3f0863d6a733af7b03a87.png

 

Expand  

I wonder did anyone noticed you chose a luminous green color to highlight the burn. 

Posted
  On 6/5/2024 at 7:08 PM, Jon said:

Using a water based organic material such as coffee with a solvent based lume is a recipe that ain't gonna work in my book.

Expand  

My worry is that coffee or other "edible" pigments will be hydroscopic, and encourage mould and rust to form. This happens to some degree with older lume anyway, but I think small amounts of acrylic paint or pigment powders might be a safer option.

  • Like 2
  • 1 month later...
  • 1 month later...
Posted

I was googling to find out when Timex stopped using radium, and if they ever used tritium or had some other compound (I have a 1966 model with crumbly lume dust but it doesn't look like radium at all).

I found no conclusive info, only reddit speculation and this unhelpful response from the Google AI, telling me Indigo™ was in use since the 60s.

Screenshot_20240907-210214.png

Posted (edited)

The trouble with AI is that it is not always very well informed.
For what its worth, Indiglo is a non radioactive dial illumination system.

Here is ChatGPT's take on Indiglo.
 

  Quote

Timex Indiglo is a type of electroluminescent technology used in Timex watches to provide backlighting for the watch dial. It was introduced by Timex in 1992 and became one of the brand’s signature features.

Here’s how it works:

Electroluminescence: Indiglo uses an electroluminescent panel behind the watch dial. When activated, an electrical current passes through the material, causing it to emit a bright, even glow. This allows the entire dial to be illuminated, making it easy to read the time in low-light or dark conditions.

Activation: The backlight is typically activated by pressing a button on the side of the watch, often the crown or a dedicated button.

The Indiglo feature became extremely popular for its practicality and simplicity, and it remains one of the most recognizable aspects of Timex watches today. The technology has been applied to various Timex models, from analog to digital watches.

Expand  


.. and with a little prompting, here is what it knows about Radium dials dumped by Timex Dundee.

  Quote


Based on the documents from the National Records of Scotland, it appears that in 1949, the now-defunct Dundee firm UK Time, a forerunner to Timex, arranged a deal with local fishermen to dispose of 35,000 luminised dials coated with radium by dumping them in the Tay Estuary. This practice reportedly continued for another eight years, with an estimated 5,000 dials being dumped annually until the dumping was shifted to the UK's official disposal site at Beaufort’s Dyke.

Expand  

So in other words, Timex dumped a lot of radium dials over an extended period into the Tay Estuary, the North Sea and ultimately into the Irish Sea/Celtic Sea/North Atlantic. As to how much of  hazard they actually pose, that is debatable. Not much, unless you happen to be extremely unlucky, and eat a fish that ate a lume flake that Timex made.

... and finally what it knows about Timex Tritium dials.

 

  Quote

Yes, Timex, like many watch manufacturers, used tritium in some of its watch dials, particularly during the mid-20th century, after radium was phased out due to its health risks. Tritium is a radioactive isotope of hydrogen that was widely adopted as a safer alternative to radium for creating luminous watch dials.

Here’s how tritium was used in Timex watches:

Luminous Paint: Tritium was mixed with a phosphorescent material to create luminous paint. This paint would glow in the dark without needing exposure to light, allowing the watch dial and hands to be visible in low-light conditions.

Safety: Tritium is much less radioactive than radium and does not pose the same severe health risks because the radiation it emits (beta particles) cannot penetrate the skin. It was considered a safer option for luminescent watch dials.

Decline in Use: Over time, the use of tritium in watch dials has declined due to advancements in safer and more durable luminescent materials like Super-LumiNova, which are non-radioactive.

Tritium is still used in some modern watches, particularly in tactical or military timepieces, but its use is more regulated, and the amount of tritium used is much lower than in earlier decades.

Expand  

This makes perfect sense. If you really want to know what was on your watch dial however, try measuring the activity with a geiger counter. Rather counter-intuitively if it is still quite "hot" then it is probably Radium, but if it is only sightly "hot", then it may be tritium, and if it doesn't even register, then it is probably one of the many non-radioactive luminous paints.

Also if it is still luminous, then it is probably not radium, as the zinc compound in radium dials is almost always spent, so they no longer light up. The radium on the other hand will be just about as radioactive as it ever was, so don't make the mistake of thinking that since it is no longer luminous, it is no longer radioactive, this is not the case.

Edited by AndyHull
  • Like 2
Posted (edited)

The combined lume from their total 75000 dumped dials must work out to about three shot glasses full of radium paint. I have reached the stage where I do need to get a Geiger counter, while the lume on this particular dial does glow for about 3 seconds after hitting with a powerful UV light. On the other hand, it is only 58 years old as opposed to the spent and blackened radium dials from the 1940's I would never expect to glow at all.

  On 9/8/2024 at 8:07 PM, AndyHull said:

Here’s how tritium was used in Timex watches:

Expand  

It would be nice if ChatGPT supplied a source citation for literally any of its essay on Timex and tritium because it reads a lot like it gave you a description of what tritium is and how watch companies used it, decided Timex is a watch company and thus also used tritium.

  On 9/8/2024 at 8:07 PM, AndyHull said:

The trouble with AI is that it is not always very well informed.

Expand  

And the trouble with Google search as of a couple months ago is that you cannot perform one without it spouting the AI nonsense at the top. It's Indiglo blurb was a wrong response to a question I didn't ask, by a party I didn't want to hear from.

Edited by mbwatch
  • Like 1
Posted (edited)

Don't ever loose sight of the fact that "artificial" can also mean "affected or insincere", and so long as you bear that in mind when reading the response of the likes of CharGPT, you are less likely to stray into the minefield of believing everything they come up with.

Edited by AndyHull
Posted
  On 9/9/2024 at 8:58 PM, AndyHull said:

Don't ever loose sight of the fact that "artificial" can also mean "affected or insincere

Expand  

Tell me about it. My day job is in academic libraries where information literacy is being steamrolled gen-AI tools.

Posted
  Quote

On two occasions I have been asked, "Pray, Mr. Babbage, if you put into the machine wrong figures, will the right answers come out?" ... I am not able rightly to apprehend the kind of confusion of ideas that could provoke such a question.

— Charles Babbage, Passages from the Life of a Philosopher

Expand  

Ever was it thus, it seems.

  • Like 4

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Haven't handled a Rolex in a long time but that's not natural. If the barrel is still useable then just grease as normal.
    • Do you have the service manual for 3135 as it would explain the procedure then in the absence of that the current procedure for modern mainsprings would be breaking grease on the outer wall as it's an automatic watch. The mainsprings are considered prelubricated no lubrication is required. Then the arbor is lubricated with a suitable lubrication. Typically the only time you see well I haven't ever seen anything quite like that Rolex but Seiko watches often the barrel is filled with some sort of I believe graphite-based lubricant. Or if too much breaking grease was applied in it leaks out but that would be a heck of a lot of breaking grease. I wonder if the black would be molybdenum disulfide? There is a variation of 8200 Quite remember the number were a little bit of molybdenum disulfide Which is a really nice high-pressure powder is mixed in with the eighth 200 and maybe they applied a heaping quantity of that?
    • The watch is from 1990 and was serviced just once around 20 years ago. No idea if the mainspring barrel was ever opened or changed before now.
    • Interesting but I think we have a problem here? We probably need to split hairs on a definition problem. For instance take a real Rolex movement put it in a real Rolex case but not the one it came in take a real dial real hands and make up a watch that is 100% real and what exactly is this? If you send your Rolex in for servicing and anything's been changed at all from what it was when it left the factory Rolex will be unhappy and remove all offending components. This does become a problem of people changing things because they think it's their watch and they want to have a different dial Lord diamonds the bezel or whatever words Rolex sees all of this as evil and bad as far as a Intel Rolex only things the watch is legit if everything is exactly what it was when it left the factory and nothing's been changed including the stem everything asked me Rolex original or their very unhappy about its existence. Then you think about a fake watch what is its real purpose? Well its real purpose is to make money for somebody and fool the customer. So all the watch has to do is look pleasant on the outside and inside can be anything. Typically nobody's going to see inside. So typically anything that's not legit counterfeit movement etc. why would someone spend so much time and effort making it look just like a real Rolex when there's no need to? Unless of course you have one or two movements to impress somebody with this is what's inside your watch but even that is problematic Now we don't end up with I've interesting problem that troubles me where I work. The owner will offend a cage your watch by looking at it carefully with a microscope the timing machine etc. and he will point out all the things that he feels are not appropriate correct or whatever for your watch. But in my example above of mixing and matching legitimate Rolex parts he wouldn't necessarily be able to tell. The problem I have with this is it often times things like his claim to telling a counterfeit is look at the second hand the quality of the secondhand is not as nice as a legitimate one. But maybe somebody replaced a second hand on a real Rolex. Or the other day at work I don't know what it was in before but there was a really pretty movement transparent back and they decided it was fake because of? Now I didn't think it was fake I took one look was beautifully manufactured but they had a reason What bothers me with counterfeit Rolex is or anything counterfeit watch related it is reminding me of a witchhunt. The early days of witch hunting how can we tell a which Manon which? That makes me wonder how many super fakes are really fake at all it's basically somebody deciding it's a fake based upon inappropriate assumptions. Like the secondhand is been changed or the watch was worked on the screws are perfect or other things. Other minor problems with super fakes for instance I have a long story the not going to tell the short version is I found the website once where they claim to be counterfeiting Rolex watches. They even had a picture to prove their counterfeit watch the problem with pictures online how do we know it's really a counterfeit watch and not a real Rolex watch that you're telling us is counterfeit. Oh and they had testimonials from all kinds of people who bought their watches and were very happy with the service of course the problem with the watch is you don't know what's inside it unless you take the back off and just because somebody shows a picture online and says this is their super fake maybe it really isn't a super fake they be there just trying to say that. We end up with a interesting problem of manufacturing a watch. Does Rolex actually make every single part found in their watch? Then the year 2004's basically irrelevant. This is because initially Rolex buys stock in the company and they manufacture Rolex watches. I'm assuming over time Rolex will acquire more stock and only in 2004 do they get the whole company. But the company itself hasn't really changed other than the name on the front of the building. The real question is did they really make every single component found in the Rolex watch from the beginning of time until end of the time? A lot of the components found in a watch would be extremely specialized did they make their own jewels or their own mainsprings for instance? But that is looking at the article they employ a heck of a lot of people now I would guess now that Rolex probably does make everything in-house. Especially when they have nifty CNC equipment like for making screws were he could make a huge batch of one type it instantly switch to another type where before he needed specialized machines for one machine for one screw now manufacturing all kinds of stuff in-house becomes very simple. But still is possible that in the early days they might have outsourced something may be perhaps. But conceivably we do have minor changes in thing is due to how things have been made over time which can lead to confusions over whether this is legit or not when it may be as a change of manufacturing methods oh and regarding the screws found in your Rolex watch? In about mid-80s I went to a school reunion in Switzerland. One of things we could do was visit a factory and I picked Rolex because I wanted to see the mass production making of Rolex watches. Which is very disappointed I did not get the sea at all because didn't see them making Rolex watches in their Geneva headquarters even though the building is really fake? So what did we get to see well after sales service because after all were watchmakers we should see that. Did learn something interesting about Rolex screws if your watch was sent to Rolex the screws that come back are not the ones that went there. As they are using powered screwdrivers they don't want to risk breaking heads off and they will replace the screws of every single watch. The other one of interest was suppose there's a scratch and you can see the brass? No problem they have a solution that basically electoral plates without electricity so the scratch goes away. The research Department was quite boring and didn't look like anyone was ever there. Then it was too long ago to remember all the details other than I was disappointed I want to see manufacturing.   Yes the joys of artificial intelligence that is more like a trained monkey that's there to please you.
    • Hey everybody! I just registered to WRT. I found this forum searching for informations about ELMA watch cleaning machines (will get one ELMA tomorrow ✌️). I'm new in watch repair, collecting watch repair tools to fill up my work space 😎.   Greetings from Vienna Michael
×
×
  • Create New...