Jump to content

ISA 1198 in 2824 case


Recommended Posts

So I'm putting together parts for my second watch build. I've got a 2824 case in the mail. It would make sense for this one to be quartz because it won't see much wrist time.

So if I purchase a ISA 1198 what problems am I looking at? I know the second hand is a different size. Will the crown fit? Is there any issue I'll run into if I decide to go this way?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

isn't the stemheight totally different? Do you have only the case of also the dail?

Manufacturer: ISA
Size (Ligne): 11-1/2 Round
Thickness: 3.25mm
Hands: 90/150/20
Width: 25.60mm
Watch Battery: 395
Jewels: 1
Watch Stem:

ISA1198-STEM10, Tap 10; or ISA1198-STEM08, Tap 8

 

ETA 2824-2

Features
automatic
sweep second
date: quickset
option: hack feature

Data
11.5''', Dm= 25.6mm, Do= 26.0mm
H= 4.6mm (H= 4.7mm with ball bearing)
F= 1.2mm
T= 1.8mm
17/21/25 jewels
f = 28800 A/h
power reserve 40h

Balance staff ETA 2801

Stem W3738

Mainspring / battery
1.25 x 11.0 x 0.125mm

Hands
1.50 x 0.90 x 0.25mm

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The figure you are interested in is "T" which is the stem height. Looks like 1.8mm for the 2824. You'd generally want to get this figure to be a fairly close match for the replacement.

 

Thw 1198 may come in differnt versions of stem height depending on if it has a date complication, etc. Check the datasheets.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The figure you are interested in is "T" which is the stem height. Looks like 1.8mm for the 2824. You'd generally want to get this figure to be a fairly close match for the replacement.
 
Thw 1198 may come in differnt versions of stem height depending on if it has a date complication, etc. Check the datasheets.
Thanks Rodabod! My ability to access what I need just jumped exponentially. Im going to download the complete website on to my laptop later so if the website goes down I'll have a backup to use.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, Rattlerviper said:
29 minutes ago, rodabod said:

So in the end it looks like the 1198-103 works. I'll give it a go and if it doesn't work I'll have a movement for a new project.

I think the 103 may be thicker than the 101.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 hours ago, Rattlerviper said:

1198-103 is 3.7mm high while the 2824 is 4.6 mm high. Does that mean I would need to create a spacer for the back of the movement?

It depends on how the movement is mounted in the particular case.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I have read some suggestions that it can cause wear , particularly on the fork horns of a fully treated pallet fork. I've had half a kilo of steriac acid powder on a shelf for almost a year now, might have a little play today with a heater and a jar.  I think its because it gets into their cleaning solutions Mike. Theirs or anyone else's that services the watch next time, or if they need to strip back and rebuild. Could preclean but thats all time for a pro. I thought the idea was for the epilame to create a barrier, a wall between the lubrication and anything else, so the lube cant spread.
    • As I'm only cleaning watches in small numbers at home, I pre-clean any significant deposits of old grease and oil before using the cleaning solutions. I scrape off deposits with pegwood and Rodico, and if really dirty, wash parts in naphtha with a brush.  So I'm happy using DX, but can understand why it's avoided by the pros.
    • I think attaching a nut to the lid to pull it off is the least destructive, any damage damage on the outside is going to an easier fix than any created when trying to push it out from the inside. Scratching up the inside of the lid , mainspring or arbor bearing will be risk. Just my opinion.
    • yes the things we read in the universe I did see some where it was either difficult to clean off or it contaminated the cleaning fluid there was some issue with cleaning. I was trying to remember something about grease where as opposed to a substance of a specific consistency they were suggesting it had a base oil with something to thicken it. That conceivably could indicate that the two could separate and that would be an issue. But there is something else going on here that I had remembered so I have a link below and the description of the 9501 notice the word that I highlighted? Notice that word appears quite a bit on this particular page like 9415 has that property all so they 8200 mainspring grease and that definitely has to be mixed up when you go to use it because it definitely separates. just in case you didn't remember that nifty word there is a Wikipedia entry. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thixotropy   https://www.moebius-lubricants.ch/en/products/greases I wonder if what you're seeing is the boron nitride left behind after cleaning. In other words it's the high-pressure part of the grease and it's probably embedding itself into the metal which is why it doesn't clean off and shouldn't be a problem?
    • Yes and no. I use Moebius 9501 synthetic grease and it is significantly runnier than the Moebius 9504 synthetic grease (and I assume Molykote DX) that I previously used. I haven't seen 9504 spread and it is in my opinion the best grease money can buy. However, my current method of cleaning doesn't remove it from the parts, so that's why I have decided to use the 9501 instead. I believe I read somewhere that Molykote DX too is difficult to clean off. Thinking about it, I'm pretty sure my 9501 grease which expired in June 2022 is runnier now than it was when it was new, but whether new or old it always needs to be stirred before use. So, that's why I treat the parts of the keyless works, cannon pinion, etc. with epilame. That was very thoughtful of you and something that had completely passed me by. Not sure what the epilame will do when it wears off in a non-oiled hole. Anyone?
×
×
  • Create New...