Jump to content

Here is a horror for you.


oldhippy

Recommended Posts

I really like the description of “For Restoration”? restoration isn't's quite perhaps the right word for this. Maybe it is the right word but bits and pieces that may or may not actually go together don't always make for restoration. Then the dial being brass? I'm not a clock person but isn't that supposed to be a silver dial or specifically silver over brass that is now missing the silver perhaps? Either that or there's a heck of a lot of dust giving a silver look but almost looks like a somebody attempted to polish the dial unsuccessfully.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It what is known as a marriage? The case has been married to the movement or the other way round. They both never started out like this. The case is for an arched dial clock and movement. The movement is a square brass dial and a 30 hour movement. The seat board is new and does not match. I do not like the pendulum rod, by the looks of it I cannot see that going through the gap in the crutch. £250 is a waste of money.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Also the pendulum rod is wrong, but I see the original seems to be taped to the bit of wood.

I could see it was a 30 hour movement and I guessed the case was wrong as the big empty oval bit of glass above the dial was a bit of a give away of a marriage of the case and movement.

I would love the movement to restore, but not at £250

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I can see it needs new black wax applied to the dial and resilvering, new chain, new lead 'donut, new hour hand, pulley refurbished.

Obviously a good cleaning, probably a number of bushes and the pendulum rod looked at.

If you were paying to have someone do that I could see that costing more than £250, but my time on projects for me I don't count.

I already have everything to resilver a dial (just need a dial to practice on) cast brass rod for using for bushes in English long case clocks. A new lead 'donut' for the chain and a spare period pendulum bob, and lots of taper pins. So unless I am missing something I would only need to sort out the pendulum rod and a new set of hands although I doubt I could find ones as nice as the original set.

I own 3, 30 hour English movements 2 with painted dials, one of which is good enough to still be used even though it is showing its age, just need to find the time to start on them.

I like the simplicity of the 30 hour longcase movements and the fact that they would of all been made by hand without even an electric light bulb in the workshop.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have done some more research on this clock.  

 

James Askrigg  1746 – 1781 is recorded in Watchmakers & Clockmakers of the World vol 2

This dial dates from 1750 upwards, the give away is the tail on the number 5, it is long and curved and I expect the dial size to be 12’’. The hands are original. The case dates around 1800 due to the width of the trunk and the size of the door.  

 

A clock in this condition I would expect the pivots, pinions, pallets and possibly wheel teeth to be worn. The pulley wheel would have taken most of the wear so I expect new spikes will be needed.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Hi everyone on my timegrapher it showing this do a make anymore adjustment someone let me know ?    
    • Maybe I'm over simplifying this and I'm a little late to the discussion, but just by my looking at oil when I use it on a treated cap jewel  the oil stays in one nice bubble, but when I don't it spreads out to the edges of the jewel. I'm not sure (but could well be wrong) but the analogy of a waxed car and rain is accurate in this case, the wax is very hydrophobic and repels the water, however, the process epilame works by is a different physical process based upon cohesion/adhesion (oleophilic) not repulsion (oleophobic)  at least as far as I have read/observed. If one were to use a oleophobic substance equivalent to wax (hydrophobic) then one would need to create a donut shape to fence in the oil, however if one used such a strategy with a epilame which is oleophilic then the oil would sit on the ring of the donut and not in the 'donut hole', exactly where you don't want it. Even if the oil is smeared then the oleophilic epilame should pull it back to the center (see diagram below). Reference For interest the chemical in epilame is 2-(PERFLUOROHEXYL) ETHYL METHACRYLATE, CAS NO: 2144-53-8
    • Looks lint the teeth on the hour wheel aren't meshing with the teeth on the calendar intermediate wheel, maybe the hour wheel is sitting on top of this instead of meshing?        
    • If the oil drop was freely standing on an epilame treated cap jewel it could easily slide off if you knocked the watch hard but the balance pivot keeps it in place. 
    • Latest 404 is this Baron which has a copy of a Seiko 66B movement in it, handy when I needed to find a replacement setting lever. Apart from the setting lever, crown, stem and new crystal (original was cracked) the watch is original. Finished result:
×
×
  • Create New...