Introduce Yourself Here
New to the community? We like to know who we are chatting with :)
So why not introduce yourself here first!
4752 topics in this forum
-
- 0 replies
- 1.3k views
-
- 4 replies
- 2k views
-
- 5 replies
- 960 views
-
- 3 replies
- 1.3k views
-
- 0 replies
- 1.1k views
-
- 6 replies
- 1.2k views
-
- 4 replies
- 940 views
-
- 4 replies
- 1.3k views
-
- 2 replies
- 1k views
-
- 5 replies
- 1.3k views
-
- 0 replies
- 1.6k views
-
- 2 replies
- 1.3k views
-
- 5 replies
- 1.5k views
-
- 2 replies
- 868 views
-
- 4 replies
- 1.4k views
-
- 0 replies
- 1.2k views
-
- 1 reply
- 988 views
-
- 5 replies
- 1.6k views
-
- 1 reply
- 2.9k views
-
- 4 replies
- 1.7k views
-
- 1 reply
- 1.1k views
-
- 3 replies
- 985 views
-
- 3 replies
- 1.2k views
-
- 1 reply
- 717 views
-
- 0 replies
- 1.8k views
-
Topics
-
-
Posts
-
By nevenbekriev · Posted
Since we need first to see if this combination of parts (the balance + hairspring +staff + roller) will work correctly in this movement, gluing is the way to go. Then, if it is confirmed workable, may be tightening of the roller hole will be considered. Of course, making custom staff will solve all possible problems in the best way. But, is this watch worth it? -
No, I completely understand where you are coming form. I didn't mean to ruffle any feathers, if the post is against the terms of the board feel free to delete it. -
If they want to use the original screw down crown then yes it's necessary, otherwise there's no play from the winding position to screw it down -
By RichardHarris123 · Posted
So not strictly necessary? -
By SwissSeiko · Posted
I push on the rim, and place a sheet of plastic between the setting and the pusher to leave no marks
-
