Jump to content

Is this genuine seiko chronometer, seen one anywhere


Nucejoe

Recommended Posts

Hi all,  I recently aquired this seiko racing chronometer, have not seen one like it on internet or seiko site, whish raises doubt as to it's genuineness. Anybody seen one? Did seiko make racing chronometeres.

Seiko probably added such complications as chronometers on watches more than any other watchmaker. So wouldn,t have rivaled it's own product by making racing chronometers.

IMG-20181008-WA0009.jpg

IMG-20181008-WA0008.jpg

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, Nucejoe said:

seiko racing chronometer

Yes I realize I'm splitting hairs here but I object to the word chronometer. Classically I think of a chronometer as a ships clock with a Detent escapement. Then a course today they refer to precision timekeeping watches as chronometers.

Then the pictures online for the Seiko Stopwatch 88-5021 All look identical to yours with an exception?  The exception is yours looks absolutely brand-new and the ones online do not. Then you even have the tag which is nice.

Then because I like seeing naked movements I found you video of the inside

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k5C7qmllyFg

 

 

 

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, JohnR725 said:

Yes I realize I'm splitting hairs here but I object to the word chronometer. Classically I think of a chronometer as a ships clock with a Detent escapement. Then a course today they refer to precision timekeeping watches as chronometers.

Then the pictures online for the Seiko Stopwatch 88-5021 All look identical to yours with an exception?  The exception is yours looks absolutely brand-new and the ones online do not. Then you even have the tag which is nice.

Then because I like seeing naked movements I found you video of the inside

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k5C7qmllyFg

 

 

 

Thanks for your descriptive  response, good news and the research you have done. 

Regards joe

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, JohnR725 said:
9 minutes ago, Geo said:

That's a very nice stopwatch that you have acquired Joe.  It should be described as a chronograph not a chronometer.

I see it also adds up the second, right a chronograph. You forgot to comment on genuineness.My web access is limited, So askng the fellow forumers seemed best option. Thanks for your response and then correction you made.

 

 

Thanks for your descriptive  response, good news and the research you have done. 

Regards joe

Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, Geo said:

That's a very nice stopwatch that you have acquired Joe.  It should be described as a chronograph not a chronometer.

Do you fly them sesna? Departure stalls always made me want to quit flying.:mad:

Regards joe

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Update: I posted over on NAWCC and it looks like I melted the fine coil wires where they come into the solder lugs. After dropping the heat way down on my iron and being absurdly careful, I have a humming fork!
    • Hell0 @nevenbekriev. Thank you for your advice. I have removed the old setting using my staking set--I will keep the KIF spring, since it is still good.  I am awaiting the replacement setting, and will update when I do that. In the mean time, I looked at the escape wheel and it looks ok. What do you think?    
    • Aloha All, I recently bought this Seitz tool on eBay, but it is missing some pushers reamers.  I ended up ordering new parts for those that were missing before I received the actual Seitz tool (bad idea).   Upon inspecting the pushers/bits, I noticed 23 of the 56 provided with the set had no numbers. Further inspection revealed a huge difference in the quality of those unnumbered.  Do all Seitz pushers/bits have a number on them?  I'm pretty sure that 33 of the 56 I received are cheap Chinese knockoffs.  The worst part is that I ordered $80 of parts to replace the missing pushers/bits, and now I'm looking to return the tool. I'm not crazy, right? If these are Seitz parts, they should all be numbered, correct? The first two pictures are the Seitz (numbered), and the other pictures are the suspect parts.  Will I even be able to get a refund?  Thanks, Frank     
    • It was £10 + min fee, total £16, could not leave it there. Its a Stanton A.D.2. http://stanton-instruments.co.uk/
    • Chief- The picture below shows the three parts from the dial side that are most useful to "fingerprint" a movement in conjunction with the diameter of the movement.  That's why forum participants are always asking for dial side photos in posts asking for identification.  As far as the setting lever screw, it actually sits loose in the main plate. The threads engage the setting lever below, and the elongated stem above the shoulder sticks through a hole in one of the bridge plates so that it's held captive if unscrewed all the way.  So you may be fine as far as that goes. 
×
×
  • Create New...