Jump to content

Unusual full Westminster 2 train clock origin unkown ?


wls1971

Recommended Posts

I'm about to start work on the following clock Its a two train full Westminster strike clock I'm unsure of the origins of this clock but would presume that it is French although the seller suggested it was made by Mauthe and of German origin but I have never seen a movement like it before. The striking train is controlled by a differential gear which locks out the chime train once it has finished its sequence on the hour thus allowing it to strike the hours.

The differential gearing used in this clock was patented by Gillett and Johnston in 1923 and used by them in both weight driven clocks and Fusee clocks it was also used by Elliott in spring driven platform and pendulum clocks but I don't think this movement is of English origin.

unknow5.thumb.JPG.e5905fc0d2b6bde12284b9188c9f4ff2.JPG

 

The differential gear that drives the chime and strike

unknow2.thumb.JPG.7bfa08dc76e40711a8231ca28989d76a.JPGunknow.thumb.JPG.72cc6b753fc69747e3db2006638bc7c9.JPG

 

The mechanism does work extremely well apart from being very dirty, it is a well made quality movement.IMG_2745.thumb.JPG.0c29aee55612f7f62694c022a2f648e1.JPGunknow6.thumb.JPG.79d5aae1cefc727edf60dd30c51ba6b7.JPGunknow3.thumb.JPG.ce43fcc8a03b32976f634ec511c0e5da.JPG

 

There is only a serial number on the clock and a small stamped letter J anyone have a idea about the origins of this movement ?

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I cannot be 100% because this is a first for me. I am not happy with the finish of the screws and parts of the movement. That is why I do not think it is French. I do not think it is made by Mauthe. There clocks had a mark (see photo) I’m sure it is German as there is a J I wonder if it was made by Junghans.

Mauthe_Trademark_c._1925.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks for the reply's yes the screws are not highly polished as you would expect on a French clock , but the suspension Brocot adjustment made me think it was perhaps french in origin, I shall clean it up I have on occasion found makers marks on the inner plate surfaces so I shall see if anything comes up whilst cleaning.

The J could be Junghans but that is usually stamped within a star this is not, the clock was retailed by a English Jeweller, the only other observation is that the Hands are of a style that I have only ever seen used on Winterhalder clocks and I have a 3/4 Westminster two train clock with the exact same hands fitted that clock of course does not do the chimes on the hour but just strikes the hours.

I shall post more pictures as I clean the clock.

Many thanks

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 hours ago, oldhippy said:

 

I cannot be 100% because this is a first for me. I am not happy with the finish of the screws and parts of the movement. That is why I do not think it is French. I do not think it is made by Mauthe. There clocks had a mark (see photo) I’m sure it is German as there is a J I wonder if it was made by Junghans.

Mauthe_Trademark_c._1925.png

Here it is..what ever it means..

F.M.S. (im Kreis mit Adler)   Friedrich Mauthe GmbH Großuhren; Schwenningen, Deutschland; registriert am 28.1.1925

Len

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 hours ago, wls1971 said:

I'm about to start work on the following clock Its a two train full Westminster strike clock I'm unsure of the origins of this clock but would presume that it is French although the seller suggested it was made by Mauthe and of German origin but I have never seen a movement like it before. The striking train is controlled by a differential gear which locks out the chime train once it has finished its sequence on the hour thus allowing it to strike the hours.

The differential gearing used in this clock was patented by Gillett and Johnston in 1923 and used by them in both weight driven clocks and Fusee clocks it was also used by Elliott in spring driven platform and pendulum clocks but I don't think this movement is of English origin.

unknow5.thumb.JPG.e5905fc0d2b6bde12284b9188c9f4ff2.JPG

 

The differential gear that drives the chime and strike

unknow2.thumb.JPG.7bfa08dc76e40711a8231ca28989d76a.JPGunknow.thumb.JPG.72cc6b753fc69747e3db2006638bc7c9.JPG

 

The mechanism does work extremely well apart from being very dirty, it is a well made quality movement.IMG_2745.thumb.JPG.0c29aee55612f7f62694c022a2f648e1.JPGunknow6.thumb.JPG.79d5aae1cefc727edf60dd30c51ba6b7.JPGunknow3.thumb.JPG.ce43fcc8a03b32976f634ec511c0e5da.JPG

 

There is only a serial number on the clock and a small stamped letter J anyone have a idea about the origins of this movement ?

 

 

Another beautiful unusual movement, where do you get them from??

Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, Lenj said:

Another beautiful unusual movement, where do you get them from??

It was a Ebay purchase I was drawn to the ingenious solution to getting a full Westminster strike from a two train clock, when its running it works extremely well but like all these two train Westminster clocks it has a huge spring on the strike train.

I have had further correspondence with the seller he states that he thinks it Mauthe because he has had  a similar movement that was stamped Mauthe 

" I`ve had a Mauthe clock before which was stamped, but the movements were very similar. I took it to the British Horological open day and the general opinion was that it was more like a Mauthe than anything else!
Mauthe senior, had a son who registered a business in France post WW1 and I wonder if that might be the answer?"

The differential strike controller was invented by Gillet and Johnston in 1923 and is very similar in design using a differential gear that locks out the chimes when they have completed the sequence on the hour and letting the hour strike run,

https://patentimages.storage.googleapis.com/cb/23/0f/34b4fc44f86b51/US1468267.pdf

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, wls1971 said:

It was a Ebay purchase I was drawn to the ingenious solution to getting a full Westminster strike from a two train clock, when its running it works extremely well but like all these two train Westminster clocks it has a huge spring on the strike train.

I have had further correspondence with the seller he states that he thinks it Mauthe because he has had  a similar movement that was stamped Mauthe 

" I`ve had a Mauthe clock before which was stamped, but the movements were very similar. I took it to the British Horological open day and the general opinion was that it was more like a Mauthe than anything else!
Mauthe senior, had a son who registered a business in France post WW1 and I wonder if that might be the answer?"

The differential strike controller was invented by Gillet and Johnston in 1923 and is very similar in design using a differential gear that locks out the chimes when they have completed the sequence on the hour and letting the hour strike run,

https://patentimages.storage.googleapis.com/cb/23/0f/34b4fc44f86b51/US1468267.pdf

 

If you look further up the page, I found your clock, and Yes it's Frederick Mauthe. Good find. Date are about right 1925.

 

Len

 

Edited by Lenj
Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, Lenj said:

If you look further up the page, I found your clock, and Yes it's Frederick Mauthe. Good find. Date are about right 1925.

 

Mauthe must have had some kind of agreement to manufacture them because they would have been a clear infringement of Gillett and Johnstons Patent, the system of regulating the strike is almost identical.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I hope you can record the taking apart of this movement and showing the parts. It would be wonderful if you could record the action of the works.

You never stop learning in horology. I’m seeing and learning something all new to me.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, oldhippy said:

 

I hope you can record the taking apart of this movement and showing the parts. It would be wonderful if you could record the action of the works.

You never stop learning in horology. I’m seeing and learning something all new to me.  

Well I should yes its such an unusual and ingenious way of getting a full chime sequence from two springs, i wonder why it never caught on it works so well, I shall have to video the works in action, but work beckons tomorrow so will have to do it next week.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • As far as I know, the only time an epilame treatment has potential drawbacks is when something is rubbing on the treated part w/o lubrication in between creating abrasive dust. That is, I don't believe in the method of "running the watch to make a groove through it first in the pallet stones where the lubrication is then placed". So, I think the rule would be; do not epilame treat parts where rubbing is going on without lubrication. Other than that I don't think we have anything to worry about. That said, I'm not an expert, and I'm always happy to learn more. Has any other repairer than Alex suggested or explained the "making-a-groove" method? My impression is that it's just something he constructed in his mind. I have not perceived it as a generally practiced method. Again, I could be wrong!
    • Post some pictures , some good close ones of the parts you've described. 
    • Ive never used epilame H only information i have read and mentally stored about it mostly from Nicklesilver here and elsewhere ( the fork horns thing ), maybe the residue powder that is removed has some grinding effect ? So probably a good idea to limit its application areas to only the absolute necessary. Yes as far as i know epilame rubs off relatively easy, the technique of running the watch to make a groove through it first in the pallet stones where the lubrication is then placed. This i understand creates the barrier for the lube to sit up to. If i can find a good balance of pros and cons of its use then thats one process i can avoid by using a thixotropic lube on the stones. The epilame i would say allows for a more fluid lubrication to be used that would increase amplitude on low beat movements. The stearic acid powder is extremely cheap, the problem is the fuming process to coat parts, is not selective , the whole part has to treated in this method. If epilame residue can cause wear then thats not good, if I remember the conclusion was not proved entirely just a general assumption between watchmakers. The thread is out there somewhere, the same discussion is also old on a facebook group. Ive never used epilame H only information i have read and mentally stored about it mostly from Nicklesilver here and elsewhere ( the fork horns thing ), maybe the residue powder that is removed has some grinding effect ? So probably a good idea to limit its application areas to only the absolute necessary. Yes as far as i know epilame rubs off relatively easy, the technique of running the watch to make a groove through it first in the pallet stones where the lubrication is then placed. This i understand creates the barrier for the lube to sit up to. If i can find a good balance of pros and cons of its use then thats one process i can avoid by using a thixotropic lube on the stones. The epilame i would say allows for a more fluid lubrication to be used that would increase amplitude on low beat movements. The stearic acid powder is extremely cheap, the problem is the fuming process to coat parts, is not selective , the whole part has to treated in this method. If epilame residue can cause wear then thats not good, if I remember the conclusion was not proved entirely just a general assumption between watchmakers. The thread is out there somewhere, the same discussion is also old on a facebook group. If its a potential problem for amateurs to use then i would prefer not to take the risk .
    • Following on from my question about identifying screws in the AS2063 movement that basically fell out of the case in bits, I’m pleased to report that I’ve got it all back together, and the movement is running pretty well.    But… There’s something wrong with the keyless works and hand setting. It’s fine in winding and quickset date position - these work - but in hand setting position winding the crown turns the whole gear train.  I don’t really understand how it’s meant to work. It doesn’t have a traditional friction fit cannon pinion.  The second wheel is unusual with a pair of smaller pinions on it, which seem to interact with the barrel and the motion works.    Could this be the problem? I must admit I just cleaned it and popped it in place when reassembling the gear train. I’ve lubricated the pivots but didn’t do anything to the extra bits on the second wheel.    Does this make sense and is anyone able to figure out what I’m doing wrong? Thanks in advance, as always.    ETA - the parts list calls it the Great Wheel, not second wheel. 
    • You're thinking metal to jewel in general I guess. Maybe it would be a good idea to peg the pallet staff jewel hole on the main plate after the epilame treatment. I think that could work as it is my impression that the epilame doesn't sit very hard, but I could be wrong about that so feel free to educate me. I didn't remember that 9501 was thixotropic (thanks for the link). That would mean it's even runnier during impact (lower viscosity) so perhaps it's time I get some fresh grease as mine seems a bit too runny. What I have seen is a whitish surface after washing but it goes away if I scrub the surface with a brush in a degreaser (Horosolv). I don't think it embeds itself in the metal but sticks very hard to the metal. I don't worry too much about the cleaning solution. I just want perfectly clean parts and my solution can be replaced for little money (ELMA RED 1:9). Anyway, I quite often need "to strip back and rebuild" and scrubbing parts by hand isn't exactly the most stimulating part of a service. Just got confirmation that Moebius 9501 has a lower viscosity (68 cSt at 20° C) than 9504 (305 cSt at 20°). The viscosity of Molykote DX is 285-315 cSt at -25° to +125° C. I was surprised to see that the viscosity of Moebius 9010 (thin oil!) is higher (150 cSt at 20°) than my 9501 grease!
×
×
  • Create New...