Jump to content

Super dupertight centre chrono hand on 7750


Recommended Posts

I have had a nightmare yesterday trying to pull of the centre seconds hand on a 7750, which has resulted in the pipe staying and the hand flying. the pipe is still in there.

Ifor the seconds only, can someone recommend a good tool, i use hand levers and usually from the hour it pulls them all off, but this doesnt feel like the safest way and in this case felt like the seconds was so strong that it would damage the hour and minute.

once i get the pipe off (going to try some oil ) i will see if i can repair the hand

thanks in advance.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is not uncommon with the 7750 if it is powering a Breitling. I had the very same issue with the pipe detaching from the hand. I did find a supplier in Australia who supplied a genuine Breitling hand for 60$ (at the time approx. £50) there is a vid I see where you see a Brietling watch being assembled and the hands are hammered on. I found on a forum with many with the same issue recommending removing the hands with nail clippers gripping the pipe before pulling. 

 

This was post in 2016

https://www.watchrepairtalk.com/topic/4355-remove-a-breitling-hands-eta-7750-chrono/

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, clockboy said:

there is a vid I see where you see a Brietling watch being assembled and the hands are hammered on.

It's my understanding that on some modern chronograph's the hands are supposed to be replaced. Which is bad if you're not a service center where you can get the set a hands.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, JohnR725 said:

It's my understanding that on some modern chronograph's the hands are supposed to be replaced.

A central chrono hand exercises a large instantaneous force when reset, due to its length and angular momentum. So they always then to get lose and I'm not surprised that some makers go to the extreme, probably in order not to have to deal with returns on both new and serviced watches.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In the Q&A part of this link from Christian,

http://watchguy.co.uk/how-to-repairing-watch-hands/

someone mentions the use of a modified presto tool (in the context of chrono sub dial hands, but I guess could apply to centre chrono hand). This allows pulling on the tube rather than the hand / rivet. I have never tried it myself but it seems to have some merit, some of these hands can be pressed so tight the rivet is the first to give way.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, oli said:

In the Q&A part of this link from Christian,

http://watchguy.co.uk/how-to-repairing-watch-hands/

someone mentions the use of a modified presto tool (in the context of chrono sub dial hands, but I guess could apply to centre chrono hand). This allows pulling on the tube rather than the hand / rivet. I have never tried it myself but it seems to have some merit, some of these hands can be pressed so tight the rivet is the first to give way.

That "craig" talks as if he's so sure but the objection from Christian makes a lot of sense to me:

I’m not sure that the pressure from the hand remover on the tube is enough to lift it up. These tubes are almost impossible to remove even when the hand is gone …

Link to comment
Share on other sites



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Update: I posted over on NAWCC and it looks like I melted the fine coil wires where they come into the solder lugs. After dropping the heat way down on my iron and being absurdly careful, I have a humming fork!
    • Hell0 @nevenbekriev. Thank you for your advice. I have removed the old setting using my staking set--I will keep the KIF spring, since it is still good.  I am awaiting the replacement setting, and will update when I do that. In the mean time, I looked at the escape wheel and it looks ok. What do you think?    
    • Aloha All, I recently bought this Seitz tool on eBay, but it is missing some pushers reamers.  I ended up ordering new parts for those that were missing before I received the actual Seitz tool (bad idea).   Upon inspecting the pushers/bits, I noticed 23 of the 56 provided with the set had no numbers. Further inspection revealed a huge difference in the quality of those unnumbered.  Do all Seitz pushers/bits have a number on them?  I'm pretty sure that 33 of the 56 I received are cheap Chinese knockoffs.  The worst part is that I ordered $80 of parts to replace the missing pushers/bits, and now I'm looking to return the tool. I'm not crazy, right? If these are Seitz parts, they should all be numbered, correct? The first two pictures are the Seitz (numbered), and the other pictures are the suspect parts.  Will I even be able to get a refund?  Thanks, Frank     
    • It was £10 + min fee, total £16, could not leave it there. Its a Stanton A.D.2. http://stanton-instruments.co.uk/
    • Chief- The picture below shows the three parts from the dial side that are most useful to "fingerprint" a movement in conjunction with the diameter of the movement.  That's why forum participants are always asking for dial side photos in posts asking for identification.  As far as the setting lever screw, it actually sits loose in the main plate. The threads engage the setting lever below, and the elongated stem above the shoulder sticks through a hole in one of the bridge plates so that it's held captive if unscrewed all the way.  So you may be fine as far as that goes. 
×
×
  • Create New...