Jump to content

BFG 866


Recommended Posts

Hi all,

I’m a new member and new to this ‘hobby’. This site seems to be where it’s happening.

my very first attempt is with a BFG 866 which I have stripped cleaned and rebuilt. Not applied any oils or greases yet as I plan to do this a few times. However... I have noticed that the hairspring has come detached from the ‘cock’ plate? I cannot see nor find how this is reattached... is this broken?

Any guidance is much appreciated. 

Thanks, Marc 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

First make sure the H/S is in between the regulator. You thread the H/S into the little hole and pin it. Make sure the watch is in beat. If you didn’t remove the H/S from the balance wheel it should be right.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

For press-fitted (friction fit), you must remove the balance cock and flip it over. The stud hole must be supported underneath as you carefully press the stud into position. This can be carefully pressed with closed tweezers or a medium screwdriver (say 1.0mm or so). It must be pressed to a depth which leaves the hairspring sitting flat once the balance cock is re-fitted. The hairspring must also be positioned between the curb pins (aka index pins) on the regulator arm; this is sometimes formed with one fixed pin and one rotatable “boot” which can be carefully twisted to open and shut. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thank you for a brilliantly detailed explanation however my knowledge is far from yours... when you say stud? The hairspring has no end to it. Just the wire, should this stud be attached? 

I have tried to attach images but I am not able to for some reason. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, oldhippy said:

maxresdefault.jpg

Many thanks for the images.

My BFG866 is much more crude. I looks like the spring has broken from the ‘stud’ which would press into the cock plate. Does this seem likely? 

2BC963C3-028D-4B63-B82E-C3082BD97D53.jpeg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If you remove the pin from your stud, you might find a tiny part of the H/S if so it has broken. I would try to re-pin and see what happens. You will need to set it in beat and regulate. The H/S probably will need to be adjusted so the coils do not touch each other.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 10 months later...
  • 11 months later...
On 5/13/2018 at 1:28 PM, oldhippy said:

If you remove the pin from your stud, you might find a tiny part of the H/S if so it has broken. I would try to re-pin and see what happens. You will need to set it in beat and regulate. The H/S probably will need to be adjusted so the coils do not touch each other.  

 

Hello, 

I know this is an older post, but if you happen to see this message, can you let me know how to remove the pin from the stud? I am working on the same BFG 866 hairspring and would like to remove the hairspring so I can try to straighten it out. I'm using this as practice.

Thanks ahead for your help!

g

bfg hairspring.jpeg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Nucejoe said:

I screw down the cock back on main plate for safer handling. To unpin the hairsprings ,use smooth jaw pliers and pull straight out.

 

 

I just examined the hairspring again. That pin is very tiny - can you recommend the proper pliers? And, once pulled out, is it easy to put back in?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Micro pins are easier to loose than putting back. 

Put a dab of grease on screwdriver blade to set the micro pin perpendicular to the flat side of screw driver blade.the grease will keep the pin in place and it won't fall. Aim the stud hole to insert  the sharp end of micro pin in the hole, use a pair of tweezers to drive the pin home. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites



  • Similar Content

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • hmmmm.... maybe there is a way to skin that cat 🙀 let me think on it... unless anyone else has any ideas? I left the opening in the side of the base and ring quite large to maybe allow you to grip the crown, but appreciate this may not always be possible, especially for small movements where the crown will not extend past the outer wall of the holder. I noticed this also, but after using the holder for a while I noticed that the ring/holder began to wear into shape (rough edges/bumps worn off) and the size became closer to the desired movement OD. Maybe with some trial and error we could add 0.5 mm (??) to the movement OD to allow for this initial bedding-in?
    • Hi nickelsilver, thanks for the great explanation and the links! I'll take a good look in the article.  Especially this is great news to hear! Looking through forums and youtube videos I was informed to 'fist find a case and then fit a movement for it'. But seems that's not the case for pocket watches at least?  I guess I should be looking to find some 'male square bench keys' for now. I was thinking of winding the mainspring using a screwdriver directly, but I found a thread that you've replied on, saying that it could damage the spring. 
    • Murks, The rate and amplitude look OK, and the amplitude should improve once the oils you have used get a chance to move bed-in, also I notice that you are using default 52 degrees for the lift angle, if you get the real lift angle (assuming it's not actually 52) this will change your amplitude - maybe higher, maybe lower. I notice that the beat error is a little high, but not crazy high. At the risk of upsetting the purists, if the balance has an adjustment arm I would go ahead and try and get this <0.3 ms, but if it does not have an adjustable arm then I would probably leave well alone. Just my opinion.
    • Hi everyone on my timegrapher it showing this do a make anymore adjustment someone let me know ?    
    • Maybe I'm over simplifying this and I'm a little late to the discussion, but just by my looking at oil when I use it on a treated cap jewel  the oil stays in one nice bubble, but when I don't it spreads out to the edges of the jewel. I'm not sure (but could well be wrong) but the analogy of a waxed car and rain is accurate in this case, the wax is very hydrophobic and repels the water, however, the process epilame works by is a different physical process based upon cohesion/adhesion (oleophilic) not repulsion (oleophobic)  at least as far as I have read/observed. If one were to use a oleophobic substance equivalent to wax (hydrophobic) then one would need to create a donut shape to fence in the oil, however if one used such a strategy with a epilame which is oleophilic then the oil would sit on the ring of the donut and not in the 'donut hole', exactly where you don't want it. Even if the oil is smeared then the oleophilic epilame should pull it back to the center (see diagram below). Reference For interest the chemical in epilame is 2-(PERFLUOROHEXYL) ETHYL METHACRYLATE, CAS NO: 2144-53-8
×
×
  • Create New...