Jump to content

Some parts are left with white stains after parts cleaning


Recommended Posts

Some parts are left with white stains after parts cleaning 
I tried to remove it with a washing solution or alcohol, but it can not be removed. How can I get rid of such stains?
And is there a way to prevent staining when cleaning?

Thanks in advanced

20180415_183532.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi oldhippy,

I clean movement and parts by hand with solvent (or n-Hexane).
I clean parts with a watch overhaul brush at first time.
Then move to new solvent bowl and brush the parts with a soft paint brush.
And I use blower to dry the parts.

Thanks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

37 minutes ago, oldhippy said:

Hi oldhippy,

I clean movement and parts by hand with solvent (or n-Hexane).
I clean parts with a watch overhaul brush at first time.
Then move to new solvent bowl and brush the parts with a soft paint brush.
And I use blower to dry the parts.

Thanks.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sounds like the solvent is drying and leaving a residue on the parts, whether that is from the solvent you are using or residue of the old oil and dirt I don't know.

I use a cheap Chinese Ultrasonic cleaner.

Wash with a good non water based watch cleaning solution, then rinse with a solution of 80% Shellite (Naphan or Zippo lighter fluid I think it is called in the USA) and 20% turps, then a final rinse of 100% Shellite.

I find if you dont rinse twice you dont get it completely clean

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If using lighter fuel, make sure you use a good quality brand as the cheaper ones have not been refined/processed to a high level of purity and so tend to leave residues.  An easy test is to place a small drop on a piece of clean metal or glass (a mirror is ideal) and set it alight (but be careful!!!). The higher quality products will leave less residue, if any.

Edited by canthus
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, canthus said:

If using lighter fuel, make sure you use a good quality brand as the cheaper ones have not been refined/processed to a high level of purity and so tend to leave residues.  An easy test is to place a small drop on a piece of clean metal or glass (a mirror is ideal) and set it alight (but be careful!!!). The higher quality products will leave less residue, if any.

Hi canthus,

Thanks for your advice!!

Have a good day

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I prepare 80/20% stoddards/naptha for primary clean. Then into 1st stage rinse of 100% naptha, then 2nd stage rinse of the same but new naptha. I find to get the best results with minimal residue, please finally decant the parts onto watchmakers tissue. This draws the excess fluid away from the parts and no staining is left

I also don’t use warm air, as parts tend to fly :-)

Regards Deggsie


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I always used Ronsonol lighter fluid for cleaning the balance of watches. Its far better than any of those hairspring de-greasers. It also evaporates quickly and never leaves marks; it also helps to use a blower with it. The same goes for any watch part.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, Deggsie said:

I prepare 80/20% stoddards/naptha for primary clean. Then into 1st stage rinse of 100% naptha, then 2nd stage rinse of the same but new naptha. I find to get the best results with minimal residue, please finally decant the parts onto watchmakers tissue. This draws the excess fluid away from the parts and no staining is left

I also don’t use warm air, as parts tend to fly :-)

Regards Deggsie


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Hi Deggsie,

IT's great to know your skill and experience!! and I won't use hairdryer not to fly parts :-)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I also use lighter fluid (in small plastic pots)  in a small ultrasonic , then repeat with Isopropanol to remove any residues

(Note that IPA does dissolve shellac as used on pallet jewels and roller jewel, but I did a 3 min test in the ultrasonic without any problems)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I also use lighter fluid (in small plastic pots)  in a small ultrasonic , then repeat with Isopropanol to remove any residues
(Note that IPA does dissolve shellac as used on pallet jewels and roller jewel, but I did a 3 min test in the ultrasonic without any problems)
Thanks for your reply and it's good to know using ultrasonic tip

나의 SM-N950N 의 Tapatalk에서 보냄

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks for your reply and it's good to know using ultrasonic tip

나의 SM-N950N 의 Tapatalk에서 보냄


For interest, I took an old 1950 pallet fork with broken pivot and tested in IPA. Was still intact after 1 week soak. Methylated spirits is a different story and softened the shellac


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • This is not rare at all, the dial code and case code don't usually match.
    • Good question!! Anyone know of a substitute movement??!! 🤔🙏
    • Interesting issue that I just noticed: this Seiko 5actus Watch from 1977 has a calibre listing on the dial of 7019-8030R but on the case back it says 7019-8010!! Like a mis-printed coin, is this watch therefore worth a lot of money for its rarity?? 🤪😲🤔🤪
    • I wish that was the case. The Aegler movements used in the early days by Wilsdorf & Davis (for brands like Rolex and Rolco) came in several sizes and without designated calibre numbers that survive.  They become a bit easier to identify during the 1920s. Below is an Aegler-Rebberg, 25.74mm in diameter. It’s from a woman’s Rolex wristwatch. Stamped Rebberg and 500 on the dial plate (but it isn’t a Rebberg 500, it’s the wrong size).  I’d be interested if anyone can identify the movement.  It is based off the Aegler Nr.1, circa 1903, but they based many many calibres of different sizes on it. The closest I have to a positive ID is the  ‘Rolex Nr.50’ circa 1917, but no dial side images or movement sizes are available in the references. There are identical looking movements in many sizes.  The 25.74mm of this movement is a particularly strange size for the era, it equates to 11.41 lignes.      Best Regards, Mark
    • It looks like this movement comes with a number of different shock settings. Emmywatch shows that it comes in versions with no shock settings, 'Incabloc', 'shock resist', and 'Supershock'. Perhaps the different settings position the impulse jewel/roller table in a non-ideal position relative to the pallet fork/guard pin. Are you able to check under high magnification if the pallet fork and roller table are able to operate without any interference? Just for fun I took a look and I have one FHF 70 in my collection, a West End Secundus with a non-shock protected FHF70. I had a note with the watch that said, "Movement is stamped 'FHF 70', but the FHF70 looks to have sub-seconds instead of center seconds movement (??)" but that a google search turned up both types for this movement. EDIT: I just took a look in my parts drawer and I have a few of these movements, both in center seconds and sweep seconds, but they all are non-shock protected.  
×
×
  • Create New...